Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@coathanger wrote:
I think when Maria owned up in the Lobby it was a bit of a clue.
As long as it really was her, and she meant it. If it is her, then the stories open up a new side to her.
I’m not that concerned about authorship in here anyway. Content is everything.
Happy New Year to everyone in JC Chatroom and Boards without exception.
Kisses to the Kissies, Hugs to the Huggies, Handshakes, Hi-5s and friendship
I hope this is a year we can truly celebrate.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
@chameleon wrote:
Camel Blue is Maria_s
I’ve heard that repeatedly, but I’m not convinced, just something about that doesn’t ‘click’ for me.
His/her writing is getting better though. =D> =D>
No sarcasm intended. Every statement was sincerely meant, carefully typed and can be taken at face value.
Joker.
I honestly agreed with an opinion about your writing. I consider the other two writers to have produced more original work and to have given me more pleasure.
That does not belittle the quality of your writing in any way, as I consider both Coathanger and, especially more recently, Camel Blue to have produced superior material by wider standards. Until you began writing in your own name I even suspected that you might be Camel Blue. But it would be very difficult to begin writing anything in a similar vein without showing a debt to the originators.
However, I don’t think this subject of this thread invites personal comments and I would like to make an appeal to you about the comments you have directed at me.
I understand you have some antipathy towards VIP and myself for reasons best known to yourself. I prefer not to comment on the truth or otherwise of your statements about me, as denial, agreement or correction could add fuel to a fire which should not exist. I am not happy about them, but they do no real harm to me. I am prepared to concede any moral or material high ground that you claim.
You have made some positive contributions to the boards lately. A lot of people fail to give you credit for your intelligence, loyalty and creativity. I don’t think I am a worthy enough target to distract from your better qualities. So I will continue not to comment about myself unless absolutely necessary.
However, I don’t know what injury has been done you by the woman whose identity you have given clues about or another woman you have named. I would ask you to stop mentioning or alluding to them. In an unequal world they they bound to be seen in an even less favourable light than the one you aim at me, especially by association with the way you portray me.
If they have hurt you in any way, then it appears to have been done privately, and I think you should sort it out privately, although it is your choice of course. I am only making this appeal publicly so that there can be no confusion about what I’ve actually said.
I also believe you are a good friend and confidant to several people in JC and I think it would be unfortunate if it was thought likely that you would betray confidences unintentionally.
I wish you the same measure of happiness and peace that I wish everyone, especially at this time of year.
@..Joker.. wrote:
@Wordsworth50 wrote:
@sceptical guy wrote:
it’s a question of taste. The stories can wear a bit thin, but at times Coathanger and Camel Blue really had me laughing. Coathanger is a great satirist – the lampoons are accurate and savagely funny. Camel Blue is a good writer, and can be very funny, but the humour is rarely savage – it strikes me that Camel has a genuine affection towards the people of JC (well, most of them).
Joker’s stories aren’t funny..they begin with Joker, end with Joker, are about Joker, copy images of Joker from other story-tellers; they have no story development. They seem a bit too intent on showing that he can take a joke. It’s beyond me how anyone outside the Official Joker Fan Club can like them.
Panda’s stories are written in a very similar style to Joker’s style(?). They are an exercise in character assassination of Joker’s enemy, Maria, and leave a bad taste in the mouth. The picture of Maria presented in the better story-tellers is funnier. These stories leave me with a bad picture of the writer.
Spot on!
Words I must have upset you by mentioning Vippy gave her one before you did . Keep perving mate someone somewhere will take a married man on who continually starts his chat up with I’m not here for sex.
Well I hope the chatters with whom I did not begin the conversation using that line are at least a little insulted if they thought that I wasn’t chatting them up.
A Sincere Happy New to you Joker
@sceptical guy wrote:
it’s a question of taste. The stories can wear a bit thin, but at times Coathanger and Camel Blue really had me laughing. Coathanger is a great satirist – the lampoons are accurate and savagely funny. Camel Blue is a good writer, and can be very funny, but the humour is rarely savage – it strikes me that Camel has a genuine affection towards the people of JC (well, most of them).
Joker’s stories aren’t funny..they begin with Joker, end with Joker, are about Joker, copy images of Joker from other story-tellers; they have no story development. They seem a bit too intent on showing that he can take a joke. It’s beyond me how anyone outside the Official Joker Fan Club can like them.
Panda’s stories are written in a very similar style to Joker’s style(?). They are an exercise in character assassination of Joker’s enemy, Maria, and leave a bad taste in the mouth. The picture of Maria presented in the better story-tellers is funnier. These stories leave me with a bad picture of the writer.
Spot on!
Faaaaaaaaaaaaaaamily!
@panda12 wrote:
@Wordsworth50 wrote:
Coathanger is still the original and the best
Maybe, but only if she or he had the guts to post in their own name instead of being a name changing abuser.
Joker’s mama named him Joker?
Coathanger is still the original and the best
