Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
He’s the very tip of a very large iceberg, the UK has a practice of treating ex-service people shoddily that has continued into the modern era of professional soldiering. It undermines many claims of patriotism and takes the shine off many a memorial.
@thin ice wrote:
ive been duped too
some one told me it was just sex
then they wanted love
when will i ever learn :shock:That’s more common, amongst men as well as women, than you might think:
someone enters into an easy going friendship, then further down the line it becomes more important to them;
or they agree to being ‘buddies’ as it seems like the best way to keep company with someone who they value highly, but who’s not offering more.
Chat encounters can be more intense than face to face encounters, because the emotions and the imagination are engaged before the physical. They can become more ‘real’ as a result.
@mrs_teapot wrote:
No names were discussed thin… and thank you Dennis… but truly no need Im fine.
Its quite therapeutic admitting to yourself you were gullible and a bit thick…. and there was me thinking I was perfect :? :D :shock:
Mrs T, if the person who sets out to deceive is either determined or deluded enough, then the cleverest people can be deceived. Doctors, academics, governments and millions of individuals have all been deceived by con merchants and the disturbed.
The word ‘victim’ has been demonised. You appear to have been the victim of a deceiver with the access to a computing arrangement which circumvents the usual safeguards. that doesn’t make you unduly gullible or thick, just deceived.
There is good reason to be careful of people in chat, even the well-meaning. You have no control about how they will treat your information or with whom they are connected.
A lesson has been learned, but don’t let it stop you from being the kind of person you want to be or from enjoying the things you want to enjoy, albeit wiser than you were before.
“It’s the heart afraid of breaking that never learns to dance
It’s the dream afraid of waking that never takes the chance
It’s the one who won’t be taken who cannot seem to give
And the soul afraid of dying that never learns to live” (The Rose – Amanda McBroom)The reason why Stephen Lawrence’s brutal* murder is still remembered is because the Met police messed up so badly, not because it was a racist murder. Bringing up other racist murders for comparison, is in some ways irrelevant to the notoriety of the case, even where there are parallels. But it’s also worth remembering that in 1993, a lot of people thought racism was dying out with an older generation. The youth of Stephen’s murderers and the open racism which his parents witnessed and experienced from some police officers contradicted that.
In 1993, the Metropolitan police had the most extensive experience of policing ethnic minorities, and had worked harder than most other forces to do something about racism. In 1993 most of us thought we had modern attitudes, so if the Met could mess up something as important as a murder investigation in a way which was crassly linked to the colour of the victim, then even the Daily Mail could see there was a problem.
@(f)politics? wrote:
@Wordsworth50 wrote:
@best man wrote:
. . . . shes a 2 faced 2 bit slagg . . . . . . . the ugly gawp.
OMG!
An interesting personality, generous of body and spirit and possessing a challenging aesthetic – JC life with poli could never be boring!
:oops:
not sure abt being generous with my body mind you :shock: what are u implying ? :lol:I live in hope poli, I live in hope . . . . .
@best man wrote:
. . . . shes a 2 faced 2 bit slagg . . . . . . . the ugly gawp.
OMG!
An interesting personality, generous of body and spirit and possessing a challenging aesthetic – JC life with poli could never be boring!
@best man wrote:
and again up pops poli . . . . . who is up thins fundamental orifice.
Hmmmm, I’m a stranger to the JC prostate experience, but hearing of poli’s experience, maybe she could be the one to teach me. . . . .
Poli, I accept your proposal of JC marriage, once you’re free, we can start our engagement. :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
@(f)politics? wrote:
@Wordsworth50 wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
You’ve put him on a pedestal and I really don’t understand why. Perhaps it is true bromance… :P
You don’t complain? Then you’re not one of the ‘some’ to whom I referred. There are others, far more vehement towards thin than you who have decided not to comment here. I find that refreshing.
Your fascination with the relationship between thin and me and its implications regarding either our masculinity or sexuality is noted.
I don’t count thin as anything more than an acquaintance having only a superficial involvement with him. However I have some very close friends who share my gender and about whom I care deeply. They are very rewarding, so the term ‘bromance’ holds no fear for me and I sincerely hope that you are able to enjoy similar friendships without fear or discomfort.
Now thats a man with not only sense, but who is totally confortable in his own skin and with his own masculinity, words if i wasnt already JC wed i’d marry you :D
*faints . . . .
@panda12 wrote:
You’ve put him on a pedestal and I really don’t understand why. Perhaps it is true bromance… :P
You don’t complain? Then you’re not one of the ‘some’ to whom I referred. There are others, far more vehement towards thin than you who have decided not to comment here. I find that refreshing.
Your fascination with the relationship between thin and me and its implications regarding either our masculinity or sexuality is noted.
I don’t count thin as anything more than an acquaintance having only a superficial involvement with him. However I have some very close friends who share my gender and about whom I care deeply. They are very rewarding, so the term ‘bromance’ holds no fear for me and I sincerely hope that you are able to enjoy similar friendships without fear or discomfort.
@panda12 wrote:
@sceptical guy wrote:
Some people seem to have let their exasperation and fury at being teased so successfully by thin get in the way of the most important facts about this case – the racist atmosphere of murder (Lawrence wasn’t the first or the last to be murdered by white power gangs), and the police incompetence which led to four police investigations, two trials, a judicial inquiry, an inquest and nearly 19 years as the Lawrence family sought justice. Most of the gang seem to have escaped as a result (I hope Mrs Teapot, one of those who has not let the anti-thin crowd obscure her judgement) is right about Dobson squealing.
Thin made the right point about the cops – who can trust them on their record in this case? He is Tease Numero 1 on the boards, and people are infuriated by their inability to stamp on him, but the important thing isn’t thin but the racist climate where murder is acceptable among some young white kids.
Ah! Thin’s Numero Uno fan I see! LOL
From your posts I see you have a very one sided, and biased view on racist murders. You seem to forget that black, asian and white kids kill each other just because of the colour of their skin.
BTW – most ppl on here have the measure of thin.
The thread is about the convictions for Stephen Lawrence’s murder. He wasn’t white or asian, and his murderers weren’t asian or black; so it’s appropriate to limit passing references to white on black murders. Otherwise we end up with the mistakenly torturous attempts at political correctness which identify everything globally and as a result address nothing.
