[Wordsworth60]

@irish_lucy wrote:

@coathanger wrote:

So in answer to your question Candid, that would be a ‘No’ :shock:

Giggles tut

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again – Put Your Tuts Away!

[Wordsworth60]

@irish_lucy wrote:

ohhh i like the sound of that – wheres the form to apply for it 8)

Damn! even I think he’s cute, and I’m as straight as a straight line pulled tight!

[Wordsworth60]

@mrs_teapot wrote:

I enjoy your posts Wordsworth… and you dont waffle! I know others here will agree with that. :?

Thanks Mrs T

I actually cut quite a lot out of my original drafts, I tend to overthink things in life, so I end up carefully choosing words to say just what I mean, as far as possible, and to cover any possible misunderstandings. I’m not the only person to post lengthy entries and I don’t strive for entertainment at all costs, but I do work on the assumption that if I can understand it, most people can, granted that even I don’t understand all my eccentricities.

Camelwossname will only read this if 2 lines was a wide approximation, but ultimately my words matter as little as anyone else’s on here anyway.

[Wordsworth60]

@camel_blue wrote:

No idea how you figure out how many times your posts have been viewed but I have to say Mr WafflingWords I never get past the first two lines of yours bluddy essays :twisted:

So what :?:

[Wordsworth60]

@thin ice wrote:

@Wordsworth50 wrote:

@thin ice wrote:

@Wordsworth50 wrote:

@thin ice wrote:

truth is we all love a bit of gossip and contoversy

And yet The Never Ending Story continues. . . . .

Maybe the 4 word limit is too small to be consistently sabotaged for personalised comments whether attacks or defences

We’ll probably never know if a ‘nice’ thread is possible, because there seem to be contributors who will either make personalised comments or infer an attack from what might be an innocuous comment. But I’m willing to try if you are.

ahhh mr wordsworth
the irony of your post will be lost on so many of our fellow posters :P

It wasn’t meant ironically, so perhaps you could enlarge on your reply Thin

why say a hundred words when a few will surfice
im aware that it wasnt meant ironicaly
and im also aware that i dont need to explain it to you of all people :roll:

I try to soften some of my statements by using more words, granted perhaps too often. And while you don’t ‘need’ to explain anything to anyone online, I really don’t know what you were getting at.

[Wordsworth60]

@thin ice wrote:

@Wordsworth50 wrote:

@thin ice wrote:

truth is we all love a bit of gossip and contoversy

And yet The Never Ending Story continues. . . . .

Maybe the 4 word limit is too small to be consistently sabotaged for personalised comments whether attacks or defences

We’ll probably never know if a ‘nice’ thread is possible, because there seem to be contributors who will either make personalised comments or infer an attack from what might be an innocuous comment. But I’m willing to try if you are.

ahhh mr wordsworth
the irony of your post will be lost on so many of our fellow posters :P

It wasn’t meant ironically, so perhaps you could enlarge on your reply Thin

[Wordsworth60]

@thin ice wrote:

truth is we all love a bit of gossip and contoversy

And yet The Never Ending Story continues. . . . .

Maybe the 4 word limit is too small to be consistently sabotaged for personalised comments whether attacks or defences

We’ll probably never know if a ‘nice’ thread is possible, because there seem to be contributors who will either make personalised comments or infer an attack from what might be an innocuous comment. But I’m willing to try if you are.

[Wordsworth60]

@taffyfish wrote:

@irish_lucy wrote:

Heya Coat. its been said your BOB – which bob, fat bob??
Also were you in f2 the other night, prob last week (shìt memory) under the name StillHere??

And WordsWorth youve agreed to go for a drink with Taffy (cant remember what thread) yet you thought she was a he??? lol

A pints a pint aint it!
But yeah Words..when we going for that drink LOL.
:lol: :lol:

I agree – and good drinking company doesn’t have to be gender specific!

Taffy, If you’re serious about that drink . . . . . .

[Wordsworth60]

@taffyfish wrote:

@Wordsworth50 wrote:

@coathanger wrote:

=D> taffy, thats the idea girly :D

Taffy’s a girly!!!!!!!!

I was last time i looked :wink:

How often do you check? :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?:

[Wordsworth60]

@coathanger wrote:

But who’s cheek eh :D

Who’s Cheek?

Not another namechanger?

(y’see what I did there?)

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[Author]

Posts