Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I feel like people shouldn’t have to be afraid of violence, but I also feel like people shouldn’t have to feel afraid of Nazi-like extreme haters in action either. It’s actually pretty crazy to think that people in a place like America where people are pampered and and people focus on work rather than on hating in action, there are crazy people like that who want to make people go back to the days of paranoia rather than focusing on being successful or happy. I mean I feel like power shouldn’t be a shortcut no matter how sensitive someone is. Like I feel those in power should trust people enough to not listen to their opinions and instead focus on knowledged consensus. But personally, I believe that the justice system could be a little bit more liberal because people seem to change more when there isn’t that much fear because I think it takes away the reason to be paranoid about anything really and it takes away reasons for people to be cunning I feel. Like I think the blanket rule sort of makes mean people think that their meanness isn’t understood, which gives them plenty of space to exploit the assault law (three times someone hits someone and they’re in jail forever), maybe? For example, technically no one can prove conspiracy between many people to torture someone by taking away their trust in the same way over and over and so absolutely nothing is going to happen to them.
And personally I feel like fear creates more fear, and not trusting people actually sets them free morally because people don’t trust them anyway- so why be moral? So I feel it works better when people are bound by the moral responsibility of trust. It’s interesting how some people aren’t used to power and freedoms at all..
Saying that someone hates someone doesn’t mean anything except for that they may change. If love is one sided, then that is an invitation to reevaluate myself and to maybe discover something new that I love that I want to adapt to myself. There is no force or *having to* in that. Words should be everywhere so that it’s not a big deal to anyone. Morals is a tough competition. People may not look like the best, but open efforts is all someone needs to have the emancipation to pursue happiness and fruits no matter who it is.
Hmm interesting. Yeah that’s kind of weird of her actually. I feel like the republican party can definitely use that kind of cheerful, fun energy of also pointing out bizarre statements by the organizer. None of the conservative media on social media has said anything about it. I feel like it’s a good idea to publicize it for many reasons.
In regards to the other political message about the view that Muslims shouldn’t be allowed to immigrate here for a while, I feel like one way is that it makes a global statement that Islamic countries don’t allow other religions and for the first time that is hinted at being slightly reciprocated in a different way. Honestly though, I dont think they’d think that it’s reciprocation- maybe they’ll feel like that’s how USA always felt about that particular sect of people. But yeah ego is a difficult thing to deal with when it prevents people from changing rules or attitudes in light of new information. I feel like Trump’s comment about about sexuality kind of makes it seem like he doesn’t like people who’s morals are slightly different- comparatively prioritizing cleverness over being nice/moral, and dancing around sexuality since childhood rather than actually doing or saying something. Which is ironic because through action, he is actually married to someone who might have different morals than himself and their children seem to have different values than him as well. I remember back when he was talking about the birth certificate issue and how he is Republican, his children were embarrassed by it and asked him to not talk about that. And I think that’s why he talks kind of openly about women because his actions show that he loves women. I feel like that’s what he tries to get across- that he and people in general should be trusted more, and people should be optimistic about other people’s sentiments.
I don’t think it’s Linda Sarsour who is inspiring the march, I have a feeling that the march was going to happen regardless. I feel like the pussy-grabbing statement is making people scared of human emotions, when in fact civil people don’t really act on feelings. I’d rather someone who says they hate someone or say they don’t care than someone like Hitler or the Nazi party who always believed, even to themselves, that they loved everyone and had their best interests in mind when obviously they hated people. It’s definitely interesting that people voted for someone who was honest and morally trusted themselves and others even though it was comparatively controversial and ‘out-of-the-box,’ but that’s exactly the kind of creative freedom and optimism that makes him clever in relationships. I still kind of feel like it doesn’t legitimize mirroring controversial and out-of-the-box words with actions and using an overwhelming crowd of millions to spread wrong statements and diverting attention from a ceremony that the republicans have typically been tame about. I feel like Obama was a really good speech-giver who kept words on social media immaculate, who to be honest had a liberal media support as well, and Bush used humor and goofyness as a way to show he could be trusted and I think Trump uses honesty about what everyone secretly thinks and feels with words and doesn’t always have supporters who are trying to make him look bad by doing things like recording private conversations because he’s rich and famous, etc.
I mean it’s kind of cool to revisit that era in American history and talk about it and in a fun way learn something about gender differences in the social context, I just wish it wasn’t in a way that seems to punish Trump, though. I feel like love isn’t about punishing, it’s about morals and not listening to our inner animal/cannibal in our primitive selves. I feel like there are great sophisticated morals like valuing life, liberty, openness in knowledge, communicating feelings, trusting people with freedoms, expecting people to be smart enough to take care of themselves, being optimistic without jealousy, not being curious about people too much and really only paying attention to the goodness in people.
I agree with Sophia, I just don’t think many of these things like name-calling are worth getting angry about- I would know, I’m a peace pet :/ I wouldn’t call it being clever as just expressive of morals that I feel and I think many people feel optimistically. Sometimes people are like “why say it when it’s obvious?” but sometimes people don’t know what we think is obvious- just like people’s good intentions, sometimes. Draculina is in Cali, omg, I’m planning on going there for a while. I was under the impression most people on here are really far. I mean like for example if all you’re used to is good intentions who don’t do you anything wrong whether or not it *seems* like you want it, and then all someone bad sees is that you do want it as a natural instinct, then you have to *really* show that you don’t someone doing that to you. Most of us accept the usual sad feelings as maturity and helps us grow as people, but to some people it’s disarming and they think they need to be bound by the jail of security and are jealous that other people get to experience that kind of sad feelings and love and they never can let each other let their guards down out of curiosity. Some people feel like everyone likes companionship, whether or not we want it from strangers when we’re actually in our own chosen isolation for a while, and they justify something bad that way.
Some people get easily too optimistic to the point of not working in small ways incase someone helps, and they also don’t stop unless people prove that they don’t want something by actually doing something about it. Rapists, for example, assume the girl wants it too because she’s not being unpleasant until she physically proves that she doesn’t want him. I think the Democratic Party is legit, organically, it has always had people in that party. It’s just that maybe people don’t want more pessimists ruling just because typically bad things happen when everyone is a pessimist and doesn’t believe there is a good natural organic future. People don’t give dogs more pillows to destroy because anger with weird reasons are not validated. An action is valid only if a decision, thought process and comprehensive facts from all sides are presented and everyone votes on it. Means matter more than the end, and usually everyone agrees with that when they know more. People value freedoms more than pessimism, so no one should suffer other than what people choose and what happens naturally. Helpful information and good intentions should always prevail rather than silence and hate disguised as tough love. You can always say you hate something or someone, but you can’t do something about it. Rejection is beautiful and commercials make people less stubborn. Trolls will be better off being busy making money and gardens for their people than being criminals.
Spiders don’t like to be liked by people. People are supposed to dislike them. They look as if they are black-hearted. Spiders can be taught to not creep about.
heyy! how’s everyone doing?
Crate – Crave – Brave – Bravo – Brado – Brady
Are you going to deport me then? Lol.
Why not, you want to deport Muslims who don’t meet your exacting standards and have have said so openly on this thread. Secondly, an immigrant who home schools their children because they don’t “trust” the British education system, clearly rejects our British values and is clearly not an integrated member of our society.
She’s on bully power trip. Such a shame, too, because she’s probably a grown up. Draculina is infinitely better than you so you should show the respect that she deserves.
And personally I feel like fear creates more fear, and not trusting people actually sets them free morally because people don’t trust them anyway- so why be moral? So I feel it works better when people are bound by the moral responsibility of trust. 
