Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I was just thinking about how the FBI was wondering about solving the Waco crisis using mind reading technologies, and so for some reason I still remembered it so I was looking into some ideas. There’s this wonderous article that talks about it https://www.wired.com/2007/09/mind-reading/ and then there’s this video about the machine that transmits thoughts to the mind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=651EOeD4Lhw. Remotely controlling rats is also possible via stimulation. https://news.brown.edu/articles/2015/09/familiar
It would be nice to work from the good side on these technologies to catch and jail criminals.
Sorry, SHR, the facts are what they are. The nutjob was a Nazi who who was jailed for murder. Jo Cox’s death has frightened a lot of people in the public realm. That is a fact. The online trolls who threaten to rape and murder are the equivalent of stalkers. er Gin is not an MP. Sorry to correct you. A bravfe woman, though. Oh yes. And a very important one. She’ll figure in constitutional history when we are all long dead.
Thomas Mair seems to have much in common with Ted Kaczynski, who seem to be a target of a want to feel anger and to be proven right by extreme survivalists Thinking types who are legally confused and never really know people. They think they know best for other people and try to break them “to make them” because it’s fun. Yet farming is definitely more fun. He probably did have an existing mental illness made worse by keeping blind windows and not telling him something. It’s also likely that he was an unfortunate target of curiosity, instigative animosity and experiments through a Nazi-like conspiracy. It probably doesn’t help that he didn’t find support that would actively discourage this instead of sympathizing, and that he didn’t know another country was involved where people are so bored they care about few foreigners loving or hating them and they probably couldn’t stand focusing on themselves, so they try to focus on those opposite of them. They probably are morally weak so instead of doing the right thing, they try to find social shortcuts that doesn’t help them and creates a different set of moral holes they always regret and makes them
I wish I was working in psy ops
Democracy is the ultimate form of satisfaction. If people are satisfied with their childhoods and past, they feel no reason to have more power on anyone but themselves. They see words as amazing in communicating anything, regardless of what it is that they want to tell people. People feel optimistic that people care about what they think, and that their rights won’t be mishandled. It frees up time to create enjoyment that other people can buy and to earn money that they can enjoy with loved ones. It creates trust and that in turn makes people trustworthy. Personally I think in every world I would prefer democracy and trustful freedoms that my liberal judgments align with, truth be told.
Ww2 could have been avoided if so people didn’t sympathize with Nazis. It’s a whole different matter that it was the Nazis who sympathized with Hitler’s viewpoint that people are stupid and enabled him, and Hitler enabled the Nazis to do bad things, and the Nazis enabled Hitler to take over the world. It was a depression and demoralization filled entity that people didn’t successfully discourage. It’s okay to say they hate some people- that means that it’s a wall to navigate around, but it’s not okay to do something about a mere sentiment.
When there are holes in morals, there’s a demoralization crisis where no one really feels like earning money or helping themselves or others. When someone keeps hitting puzzle pieces at me, I give the puzzle after it’s put together to people. If they feel paranoid and didn’t want someone to figure something out, then don’t hit puzzle pieces at me or punish the person rudely leaking their information to people like me who aren’t working for them. But all of that guilt results in those people being demoralized- the fact that they knew cures or symptoms but didn’t tell people in words, or that they secretly hate people they feel confident enough to affect. Where there are less social skills people might not know that if people makes someone angry, they shouldn’t pay attention to someone that makes them feel mad. How could there be peace if people are gravitated towards whoever makes them mad? Many people feel angry at certain people who they avoid or take a look at their own feelings. I’m pretty sure everyone has that one person they feel mad about, and they learn to not feel confident enough to deal with them. I can’t be a diplomat to a country whose politicians make me angry- people avoid jobs that involve them dealing with people who make them mad. It’s more important to be socially smart- to know themselves and others- than it is to be actually smart in the government. If the world doesn’t know what good they do for them, then why should outsiders trust them? People would rather be loved than be right.
I think that the SNL sketch could have taken the leash to steer towards sentiments that they actually and truly want instead of going along with the humor that some are actually malicious about and some are just going along with it giving up hope just like the doers/causers. I feel like sympathizing and giving the alcohol isn’t good for anyone, and maybe ww2 didn’t have to happen if people knew how to nicely disagree at each and every point instead of letting people feel what they thought they felt. I think at some point Trump also said something like that about Hillary Clinton but I feel like he was more obvious about the sentiment that he didn’t want that to happen. But in the SNL post if we analyze it I feel like there’s a false belief that Trump is somehow going to cause everyone to die, which is crazy and I think comparatively the opposite. I kind of wish there would be more focus on discouraging cold logic, pessimism and hate with good emotions, because no one in America wants moonstrings and what people want does make a difference.
It’s not you Drac, or other innocent people, that deserves to go to a war, it’s those who cause wars they want by blaming others and doing whats wrong. There are many who want freedom from their own countries and want to leak secret to others through good and innocent people who are not bound by something legal, and they are looking for good and optimistic people to fight for them. But we didn’t make or want those moonstrings in the first place, so it’s not us optimistic people who should be the messengers or the fighters. Pessimistic doers are the ones turning people into pessimistic criminals, so they should do their own fights for setting themselves free from themselves and their own strings.
Drac, do you condone bullying? Hope you reply to this and not ignore it, like you did with my last post to you about Khomeini on a different thread. I have a long memory.
You shouldn’t sympathize or encourage bad judgment. Sometimes what you used to think is right. The truth is that they don’t like focusing on each other and would rather find reasons to feel entitled when it doesn’t make sense.
Boredom
True guilt is in affecting people in ways they don’t choose. And people never really want someone who isn’t guilty to be affected in a way they don’t want. It’s only the actually guilty people who are suicidal by the hands of people. Optimism also helps with good decisions.
