[ubermik]

Thats a good point, unless its in connection with a crime they are KNOWN to have committed kids should remain anonymous in the media I reckon

[ubermik]

PMSL :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[ubermik]

Infact smiley, you mention communism and yet exhibit communist traits yourself

The assumption that everyone wants, does, thinks and pursues a unilateral and unchangeable set of things across the board with no exception and no variance

You assume that because YOU dont log on to escape from the pressures of life and do anything BUT think than nobody else would do that, thats a very communist way of thinking you know, transferrance perhaps? Overcompensation?

Anyway, point being that isnt the aim of a vast chunk of the lower class which make up the majority when they go online, they do it to watch films and tv, to look at porn, to see comical stuff, to flirt and talk chit chat with people

Politics and world issues for most are part of their life, its the last thing they want to then be bombarded with on the net as that makes the activity counterproductive

[ubermik]

You are of course assuming the vast amount of ever increasing internet users log on in a quest for knowledge, STILL maintain an active social life and marry the two to make them an active part of a democracy

Fact is the internet for many and an ever increasing many ISNT a quest for knowledge, its an escape, from pressure, life, relationships, politics, work stresses and is a quest for anything and everything EXCEPT knowledge whilst eating into or simply replacing their social life

[ubermik]

So whats wanting to hang innocent men because some idiotic bint had second thoughts AFTER the fact class as in your tiny minded idiotic world then

Short enough for your feeble brain to take in?

[ubermik]

“I agree yet some would argue that its perfectly reasonable for an adult to weigh 20 stone”

But arent they usually ones who are about 17 stone and rising quickly or the same liberal tree huggers who want to legislate so that fat people are bottom of the queue fpr treatment?

All this “its an illness” stuff is nonsense, its physically amd medically impossible to metabolise food you DONT eat, try getting one of these people who claims that to go without food for a fortnight and see how much weight they gain then, bet ya it will be a negative ammount

So, we can deduce from that the fact weight doesnt magically materialise from thin air, or even pudgey, cuddly or fat air infact, it comes from ingested material. So part of cutting weight gain requires the alteration of or reduction of whats ingested, it really IS as simple as that

[ubermik]

I know, I had to reinforce my desk just to type it haha

[ubermik]

Well I dont think you are actually “trying” to understand it at all actually

By the erection arguement a woman who is lubricated could also be classed as aroused the couldnt she by that train of illogic, and as that happens naturally then theres no such thing as rape all of a sudden, you might as well say that if a womans vagina is penetrable she is aroused and therefore consenting

What makes you think arousal alone is consent for sex?

Consent is a cognitive decision, not a physical manifestation, and thinking otherwise is just paying homage to the reather idiotic and nonsensical notion that men think with their dicks, one that rather stupid women seem to believe for some odd reason

In the example I gave a woman is classed as not giving consent JUST because she has had a drink. remember that bit because its important

So even if SHE instigates sex and is the predatorial one all the way through the act SHE is still the one who is classed as incapable of consent even is she is horny as hell, aroused to the point of looking longingly at door handles and gushing sex wee like a burst hose pipe

But the law is set to claim that even in those circumstances that woman would have been raped if she has intercourse

So keeping that in mind, a man who is equally aroused who has also had just as much to drink should equally be incapable of giving consent and therefore equalllu capable of being raped if a woman has sex with him

Thats equality

The body to varying degrees also responds to direct stimulus, as an example men have been known to get erections during torture, women have had orgasms during labour and even rape

Are you trying to claim that those are all sexual in nature then? That the man having his intestines removed is getting aroused by it and the orgasming rape victim is lapping it up?

Many men will at some point have slept with someone and had an erection but because of the relationship or because of a fall out DONT want to fuck them, so theres no cognitive consent there

Suppose a man turns down his partner and she starts fucking him whilst asleep? Should that be rape?

Suppose a man has an erection through direct stimulation whilst not wanting to take part in intercourse and is then ridden, shouldnt that be rape?

How about being penetrated with foriegn bodies such as vibrators? Rape surely?

The proposed changes in the law arent about sending mroe rapists to jail, they are only about getting more prosecutions full stop and about sending more MEN to jail

Justice, fairness and equality arent any part of these new laws, just fembot pandering man bashing

[ubermik]

Most probably either the easiest country to sneak subversives and suicide bombers into actually seeing as many US enemies are organisations rather than countries

Which would be US not the U.S. seeing as our border control is so lapse

And even if an actual country had a problem with them the US has made as sure as it can that hardly any potential enemies have ICBM capabilities so they can land a warhead on U.S. soil

But achieving the capability to reach europe and mainland UK is far easier to accomplish as are UK affiliated targets such as southern cyprus

Or far more potentially impactive targetting EU members and their affilliates to drag the UN into a conflict in opposition to the US which would then also drag us in

Either voluntarily or strategically we are a valid US target because of our complicity in their aggression around the world

[ubermik]

Because as crap as they are there isnt a consistant, trustable, viable alternative

[Author]

Posts