Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Slayer, why do we need ethnic diversity? Its a racist concept, touted by racists to cater for racists and is inherrently racist in its conception
In a NON racist enviroment the colour of someones skin ISNT supposed to be important, nor is their cultural background. Therefore the mix of cultures and race is unnecessary, and non racist prisoners dont need any specific races looking after them
You cant in one breath say that its racist to see people in terms of their background and then constantly use that as a benchmark, its contradictory
So the prison wouldnt need to be moved whether in corby and filled with whites, wolverhampton and filled with blacks or smethwick and filled with asians, although the oh so “equal” lefties probably wouldnt see a problem with the lack of diversity in the last two, coz it aint whites in the majority is it?
Where it is isnt important, what is important is that its employing people, and moving it to in effect replace whites with non whites IS racism in the exact same way moving it from a predominantly non white area to create more jobs for whites would be racist
Thats equality, not prejudice, to see that you’ll need a mirror
Why do you need a poll? Lost the TV remote and want to try changing channels with a long stick?
Just get up and press the buttons lazy :D
Well the other subtlety that slayer is conveniently choosing to overlook is that mindsets and policy implementations that favour none whites ARENT limited to just indigenous none whites are they?
Once in place and unquestioned they give the influx of economic migrants an advantage in gaining employment that the existing and predominantly white population dont have
IE its racist
Its also a complete but conveniently overlooked contradiction. On the one hand the tree hugging minority butt kissing left want us to appreciate and get orgasmic over every obscure culture in existence at the expense of our own
But whilst doing that they then conveniently ignore the fact that those same differences mean that each culture wont want to do each type of proffession in an equal and proportional amount to any other, infact its already known that some cultures dislike promotion and responsibility because they see a job merely as a means to an end and value their family and time with them far over proffessional achievemt or the ego boost of title
So on the one hand they whinge about the differences, but when it comes to employment they totally ignore them and expect every race and culture to be identical
This is no different to sexism in the work place, this was fought for, but have you noticed equal amounts of female sewerage workers? Builders? Road sweepers? Etc etc etc
Either people are different or they are the same, you cant have it both ways without looking stupid and self contradicting
Thats a very selective and brainwashed arguement, many rapists and murderers are EQUALLY that way because of piss poor parenting too, or are you claiming they are totally sane, well balanced individuals with a happy childhood behind them who consciously and cognitively CHOOSE to be what they become but THIS woman is totally and completely different and a victim of HER enviroment and past???
Well?
Whatever her past SHE is responsible for her choices today, many will have gone through far worse and NOT buckled, and many buckle at the slightest hiccup or just through dissolution with their life. Her predicament firstly isnt a guarantee of some horrendously hard life, and even if its a symptom of it SHE is still the only person ultimately responsible for her choices and actions or lack thereof
How come the word judgemental is wheeled out for a disliked statement of fact and observation, but words like empathy and compassion is used the exact same action when its agreed with and arrives at a soft and fluffy conclusion?
In either case its a comment of what is seen and is therefore the same, a society that buys too much into touchy feely victim culture is a weak one that panders to self chosen victim status and encourages it as a result, like always giving in to a noisy child
Screw the women, the child is far more important as far as I’m concerned, she chooses to be how she is, the child had it inflicted upon it as effectively as if she were abusing it in any other way. That point shouldnt be allowed to be clouded by tree hugging victim stroking
She isnt a fit parent and saying anything less will only serve to let that situation continue for longer
OMG, what a nanny state comment!!!!
“nobody to encourage her” FFS????
Having a child to parent SHOULD be encouragement enough, if that was too much of an inconvenience to their apathy then they shouldnt have had kids, they arent fashion accessories or some right to be exercised without also taking on the responsibilities that accompany them
Why not use the same arguement for murder and rape? Those poor murderers and rapists, its not THEIR fault is it? There just wasnt anyone there to encourage them to do otherwise the poor ickle mites awwwwwww
Doesnt quite float does it? And is the aftermath of this childs childhood likely to that much less impactive than if he had been abused in a real sense? Quite possibly not, and why? Because his parents CHOSE to not bother taking on the responsibility that comes with having kids
Sorry, but if someone wants their kids educated here those kids should represent themselves as “british” and act accordingly. If they cant do that then there are more than enough countries elsewhere in the world that CAN accomodate their requirements
Its not like our culture magically appeared AFTER they arrived in an attempt to make them uncomfortable, residency here did and still should have clear unwritten terms of conditions, and if someone doesnt like OUR culture they dont HAVE to stay here and endure it do they?
For as long as we have had muslims here we’ve had countless other members of pretty much every faith on earth, all of whom have managed to fit in AND still practice their religion, muslims included
This kind of nonsense lends credence to those who were classed as paranoud racists in the 80s claiming we were being subtly and slowly “invaded” and our culture would be undermined, diluted and eventually overrun by islam
Back then I thought it was laughable warblings of the paranoid, now not much more than 20 years later they are beginning to look like visionaries who could see what nobody else could see but who were incapable of putting it forward in a sane way
IF I had meant WHITES who were born here I would have said just that, but I didnt did I? So why is that what you read? Too much PC brainwashing from birth? To oversensitive to the plight of poor ickle squeaky wheels? Why exactly?
Is reading and interpretting what is ACTUALLY written rather than what you would have liked to reply to really so difficult?
We already have more than enough indigenous people unemployed here that were born here, by slanting employment to people based on right rather than place of birth we create more jobs that will be filled by immigrants leaving the existing residents having to be supported on benefits
When people who are already here are employed THEN we need to start tainting employment to accomodate economic vagrants, and as they are unlikely to start moving businesses from predominantly asian areas as found around the country in places like leeds to a “whiter” area to maintain the exact same “balance” this action isnt really “equal” in any meaning of the word
The concept that every job, proffession, business, and levels within them should have some stupid dispersion pattern of ethnicity is not only racist, but it also ignores that different cultures like and dislike different types of jobs and aspects of jobs because the cultures are different and have different priorities and value systems, otherwise they would all be the same culture to begin with
That aside tho, we SHOULD have been equally trying to get the “standard” of peoples education in corby up that required as we would do were this same problem discovered in a predominently non white area
Hardly surprising in a left wing apologist enviroment
If more non whites want to work there they should move there, if they cant be bothered to thats their problem
This kind of overt racism, because thats EXACTLY what it is should be classed and treated as such and the people responsible no matter how high a position they have should be sacked
We should be employing the people who are already live here and who were born here BEFORE creating unfair opportunitities for imported and often substandard foriegn imports
Personally I think its sky taking the piss, they are strong arming for money on the assumption that the new telewest, NTL, Virgin triad will be cash rich and would bow to leverage and cough up more dosh
For sky its a win win scenario, either they get more money for doing nothing extra or they get more customers directly rather than via cable, at the moment there doesnt seem to be a downside for them
As much as it might eventually bother me not having sky channels on my cable box most of them I can download off the net anyway before they are aired in the UK and I do partially admire virgin media for having the balls to tell sky where to get off
Personlly tho, I think its the governments responsibility to avoid monopolies and to promote competition in controlled areas such as utilities and broadcasting. So safeguards should have been put in place with the broadcasting licenses when they were issued to make this sort of thing impossible in my opinion
But as with every other government attempt at market balance they screwed this one up too it seems
I’m sure I read in a study a while back that reading studies about cancer causing substances gives you cancer
:D
