[ubermik]

I skimmed through that article and its one that opens up a conveniently avoided politically correct can of worms really

The blogger herself admits to having had countless fantasies that easily encompass or surpass the event described, these sorts of fantasy musings are hardly rare and nor are ones about gang bangs, rape and other sorts of sexually extreme occurences

So, in a world where women would like to see the eradication of such unwanted activities wouldnt a very good place to start be to not only stop writing and blogging about such things but to also cease to fantasise about them or share those fantasies with ANYONE even a partner?

As similar thing comes into play with the overly simplified PC bullshit about ALL rape being about power and control, if that WERE the case then why havent women collectively stopped fantasising about sex where they have NO control as well as actually participating in things such as S&M, bondage and while were at it even things like hair pulling, wrist holding and pretty much most sexual postitions seeing as most of them DO have a power/control or sub/dom psychological element to them

Seems a bit hypocritical to take part on any level in those sort of activities and then to bemoan people who get a kick out of them really so a more consistent and united front would seem far more logical

[ubermik]

@dead_on_arrvial wrote:

Can we get back to talking about my willy nip now?

Actually, shouldn’t that be…

@dead_on_arrvial wrote:

Can we get back to talking about my will nip now?

Seeing as it wont be a whole and complete one LOL :wink:

[ubermik]

“NOTHING in your accusations struck a remote chord” Well duh, that was actually the point of posting them lol, obvious I thought, but to you it seems not so

The acuracy is as close in either direction

What I did notice tho was at least you posted in a far saner (seeming) manner and tone this time, albeit most probably forced, but, you also quite conveniently avoided answering any of the challenges to show any post or part of one that actually backed your claims, not even pointing out where “angry” or “woman hating” was apparent to a sane person in my posts on this thread or any other, which considering this sites threads move along as fast as a queue for a cemetary wouldnt be hard should they exist

Also you avoided commenting on the distinction between disliking dislikeable types of women and hating ALL women, and the post modern feminist ideal you did mention is the same one that takes the stance that any negative whether justified or not appertaining to a woman should be treated as the derrogation of all womankind and should be opposed by the sisterhood

You dont HAVE to be a feminist to have a skewed feminist outlook, you just need to be overly exposed to the legal system and the media

its also interesting you would critise what is in effect a direct response to what was the initial direct comment really, do you feel some misguided sense of entitlement? That you are allowed to criticise due to being woman but a response isnt allowed? Because thats how you come across, as you do seem to miss the hypocrisy in criticising a criticism whilst criticising

Infact you seem to have a massive problem with hypocrisy, as you seem to feel the need to point out the inacuracy of what was infact a comment for the sole purpose of highlighting how inacurate eroneous assumptions based one a few words can be but conveniently chose to miss that point entirely and continue to arrogantly assuime your own assumptions were correct but only mine were flawed lol, I wouldnt quit the dayjob for a career in psyche assessment btw but I also wont expend any energy explaining why and how far off your assumptions were because A) its irrelevant and B) your close minded arrogant biggotted tiny mind wont be able to comprehend the possibility you could be wrong anyway so it would be wasted energy attempting it

As for psuedo pop psychology “types” ditto, I’ve seen your type equally, the people who post not out of actual valid criticism of the posts or the points being made, but out of some emotional and illogical dislike of a person they dont know but because of arrogant self absorbtion THINK they can write the biography of

You avoid any direct discussion of whats been said, you can never pull up anything that to a sane sober person backs up the wildly floundering and extreme claims and instead focus wholly on attacking the poster because you dont like what they have to say whilst often wittering on about a right to express a view (usually whilst slating someone elses equal right to the same)

Which pretty much sums up all you’ve posted so far really as nowhere have you particularly responded to or discussed anything said, but instead have basically sat mudslinging rather delusional fantasy based assumptions that are quite laughable in their acuracy but show your mindset quite transparently

So, again even tho it was a very clear request first time too

Show me where i have said ANYTHING that even hints at never mind hating, but even just disliking ALL women, show me anything I have ever posted that could be deemed “angry”, infact dont even try to find anything as vehemently extremely neurotic as your first post (we can ignore THAT hypocrisy for now) but just any post that could to a sane sober person be clearly just a tad “angry” rather than just a strongly worded response (as the two ARENT anything near being the same thing BTW)

As for the comment about “mothers”, soz cant see the relevance there at all, most women I know are mothers, some of which make kids look mature and well balanced (I would refer you back to your first post to highlight the opposite of that btw) and also some single women who ARE mature and well balanced

Being a mother DOESNT with it carry some magical inability to be a delusional hormonally tainted idiot, its only hormonally tainted mothers who like to think that, until a point in time where women have to have a mental stability test before being allowed to breed being a mother will never ever be an indication in any way shape or form of being any saner, more sensible or any other charictaristic whatsoever

It ONLY means they are a mother, nothing more, nothing less and to imply otherwise is actually a very narrow minded, biggotted, nonsensical groundless and inacurate slur and insult to all women who ARENT mothers

So, I guess that means you are a woman hater then really yeah? Seeing as you have such a low opinion of any women who ISNT a mother and feel you can castigate them en masse based purely on the basis of whether they have bred or not

tut tut

A mysoginist with tits with a post modern feminist slant, whatever next lol :lol: :lol: :lol:

[ubermik]

Actually, I still have a few minutes, so working on the assumption it WAS directed at me lets warble some more lol

“Woman hating” ? Obviously I am guessing you are using that term collectively and implying ALL women

Well, nope

Do I dislike SOME women?

Yep, most definitely and totally unashamedly

Or are you claiming that just because someone IS a woman they are above being disliked? Please clarify……….

But that doesnt make someone a “woman hater”, infact many of the types of women I do dislike most people also dislike whether they are male OR female, because they are simply “dislikeable types of women” plain and simple, and I would EQUALLY dislike men with the same (where possible) traits and make no excuse or defence of that as I am whether you like it or not entirely allowed to do so even tho you appear to think anyone who dislikes ANY woman hates all women

You might need a hell of a lot of counselling to sort out the difference between those two things from the looks of it i reckon lol

Also the “anger” you spoke about, I think you will find thats actually your own, the anger you felt over whatever it was you didnt like in my post, but just because you had an aggressive overreaction to my post DOESNT mean there was anger IN my post, thats your psychosis, not mine

Anyway, your rather eroneous rape comment, firstly you obviously dont know much about people do you? You CANT apply ANY particular thought to any particular TYPE of person, because invariably some will think it and some wont

Thats “people”, but ignoring your obvious lack if understanding of people, and more so it appears men lets look at the comment itselt

I think you are at a guess buying into the drivelous brain rot that assumes all rape is ONLY about power, that were ANY women at home in a pair of PJ’s she would be JUST as likely to be raped by ANY rapist

Doesnt really hold water that

But, you are also making the rather idiotic claim that a woman is ALWAYS blameless when she gets raped AND that any blame she does have removes blame from her attacker

So, in adult none aggressive terms here IS my view

A rapist IS always 100% responsible for their own actions and a woman cant “make” him rape her

But, the woman IS in quite a few instances equally responsible for HER actions as the rapist also DOESNT “make” her walk through a park at 3am half pissed and on her own, nor would he “make her” be extremely flirtacious with him earlier in a night club as is sometimes the initial trigger that singles her out, nor would he “make” her spend all her money on drink so she cant get a cab home nor “make” her not make reasonable steps to make sure she is safe or always in company going home

He ISNT to blame for any of that, she is

Her personal safety IS her responsibility and nobody elses

In a “perfect world” I totally agree that people should be able to wear and do whatever they want, but we dont live in a perfect world we live in THIS one, and as such somebody EVEN WOMEN should take responsibility for their OWN safety, and if they dont and put themselves into a risky situation that ends badly they ARE to blame for doing that

They arent however EVER responsible for the actions of an attacker as much as he isnt responsible for their actions

Personal responsibility its called, quite a nice concept really, and applies to women as much as men

[ubermik]

Obviously if that WASNT directed at me you can treat it as a typo haha :lol: :lol: :lol:

Although I would still totally stand by the aspects appertaining to your tone, delivery, apparent lack of control, rationality and logic as well as the absolute hypocrisy of the entire post itself as they are pretty much self evident really

But other than that have a nice day hun :wink:

[ubermik]

If thats addressed to me have you run out of prozac or something?

Bit oversensitive are ya? Just been dumped? Fat and not liking not being liked? Or just deep rooted psychological issues?

What is your problem exactly?

How about you actually try and back up some of your nonsensical drivel with examples eh?

Like pointing out where the post that got you into SUCH a menopausal oestrogen charged illogical warbling state was actually ANY of the things you claimed, mainly woman hating and
angry

Infact dissecting your emotionally idiotic rant piece by piece lets take a meandour through the mind of the derranged eh?

“oh dear…ya dont actually LIKE women do you ?”

Care to explain where stating quite indisputeable physical facts it “not liking women”?? Would saying their boobs often sag with old age ALSO be “not liking” them too in your rather pathetic excuse for a disjointed existence?

“you speak of them with such hatred..i have watched your other threads.and for ever you get in a dig about women”

Now this one is interesting, I defy you to point out one single instance of “hatred” of “WOMEN” as a collective on any of my posts on this thread or posts on ANY thread on here, infact I would wager you any amount you couldnt

“your too violent to be a homosexual..all i can think/surmise is ya had a rotten relationship with your own mother.
and ya have a rather small penis ..”

Hmmm, so, ignoring the fact that my posts are niether angry nor am I “violent” but sticking with your assumptions based on those traits in a person, your post is quite clearly “angry” isnt it? So from that we should therefore be able to assume youre quite violent too then, obviously had a crap relationship with yer dad, maybe he just wasnt even around and obviously you must have a chuff like a wizards sleeve then?

Working from your own “logic” (and I DO use the word VERY loosely btw)

So chances are you have had a trail of miserably horrible relationships, cant quite see that youre to blame for that and therefore choose to blame men, and seemingly hate men, and more so specifically any men who “DARE” to say anything not totally ass kissy of women whether factual or not

Most probably I would guess because of your denial and therefore inner conflict over ex’s criticisms of your own mental state and behaviour that cognitively youre in denial of, but subconciously know to be the truth therefore making any none positive comment about women hit a raw nerve with you,,,,,

How am I doing so far? Rhetorical question of course because you wont (I would guess) be capable or able to even grasp loosely at the hypocritical and quite insane tone and illogical infactual wording of your post, but pushing on none the less……

“lose the anger ! as yer sounding like the proverbial angry bloke”

From you that is quite laughable sweetie, do you even read what and how you write or do you have multiple personality disorder?

“that assumes women deserve to be Raped etc..”ooh she wore a short skirt..she ASKED for it””

Oh dear, you really are quite transparently but deviously trying to drum up support there arent you? The “lets pick an extreme but wildly unrelated statement thats generally quite emotive and hope no readers are intelligent enough to question its inclusion or relevance” approach lol

Bless :lol:

I
” dont like YOU at all..and i have broken a silence to warn other women to AVOID you..

go away and re join yer women hating forum…. “

Aww, how considerate you are, but arent you also collectively assuming that all those “women” you are trying selflessly to “save” are sooooo thick they arent capable of forming their own opinions and “need” someone as twisted and with as loose a grasp on reality as you seem to have to lead them into the light?

I think you will find the poor little dears you feel so driven to protect are actually quite a bit saner than “yow” dearie

sisters do we NEED this ??

Hmmmmm, the warbling mantra of the man hating misandrist that innit? Is andrea dorkin your heroine perchance?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

[ubermik]

I think the more acurate analogy would be “if I played hide the solami ONLY with me with severe cases of parkinsons disease would sex with a non shakey bloke hit the spot afterwards” lol

The thing is that nothing known to man (or woman) can stretch repeatedly without alteration, and even with the same man over time your “fudge” will change from being a fingerable fudge to a fistable one

Heres a poem to highlight that change

When I was a little girl I had a little thing
I used to squeal with fun when I popped my finger in
As I got much older my thing has lost its charm
and now it takes five fingers and half my f-ing arm

:lol:

Or the male observation

“Flip her over so you can remember what she felt like at 18” :wink:

So the PV’s or Kegels are needed even with the same sized prodding rod JUST to stay almost sort of static, although additional musculature and having to actually contract isnt any way a comparison to actual tightness really hence the current trend of reconstructive surgery of the slime chute thats going on in the states currently

[ubermik]

Maybe you never had any to strart with, or perhaps you you’ve been unlucky enough to only bump uglies with the slacker “bucket sized” gals lol

The fact is tho that millions, literally of men have complained of a lack of sensitivity, infact biology and basic human physiology dictates it WILL happen due to exposure to the air and increased friction even from simple acts like walking as human skin and the brain naturally adapts to changes in enviroment

Its also the case that the degradation could be happening at such a slow rate its like noticing your own kids growing, so gradual its unmissable similar to how women desensitise and lose their enjoyment of sex with excessive use of vibrators due to the unnavoidable stretching as well as the extreme stimulation of internal nerves over time

But more likely its an unwillingness to want to recognise it combined with a social expectance to claim it hasnt

[ubermik]

Then perhaps its because they are one minute wonders and its an attempt to stop leaving a trail of frustrated comatose women where ever they go (Well, cum actually wouldnt it be? lol)

Maybe theyre aiming towards lasting a whole (hole??) two minutes as a result of their surgery?

Or pehaps they just want their male friends to luv their cocks more?

[ubermik]

I wonder if this is because the police have given up on the war for the streets?

If they dont listen to a copper who is actually standing there next to them they are hardly going to pay any attention to a voice from a piece of machinery are they?

Thinking about the mic you speak into when you order fast food at the drive in its just another step towards a totally “McSociety” really, how long before we can have our courtcases done over the internett too?

What we need is police on the streets who ARENT harassing motorists, who DO have powers that apply to kids and their behaviour and when ignored some bootcamp style young offenders institutes

This to me is yet another attempt to “appear” to be doing something when nothing is the preferred option

And I wonder how many MP’s or their golfing buddies will be benefitting financially through this proposal either directly or via their investments?

[Author]

Posts