[ubermik]

Actually I was thinking a big brother parody would be more topical seeing as the brain rot excuse for entertainment is about to start again

“Welcome to the little sister resort, its week two so be prepared to vote for who you would like to see added to or removed from the suspect list….”kind of thing

or how about getting Alan Sugar to set the suspects tasks and then decide who gets the job of prison inmate?

Or they could do a special edition of “tears in their eyes” and get the family to dress up as various pop stars and sing their songs

Tasteless? Perhaps, but not any more tasteless than the sensationalism thats being passed off as journalism right now

[ubermik]

I told you keeping them shackled behind your neck for so long would cut off the circulation

but did you listen?………

:roll:

[ubermik]

Sometimes they will be “replying to”, sometimes stating a different perspective on the same aspect of it, other times talking about a totally different aspect of the same topic or a totally different topic thats linked to the one being discussed to the previous post

Infact even if someone is making a similar or opposing point on the same aspect of the same topic why do you feel they should or would need to acknowledge your post before they post their view?

Dont get me wrong, I’m not saying it should never happen, merely that its a totally irrelevant optional frivolity and is hardly worth even noticing let alone commenting on the absence of really

Personally I post what I think at the time, sometimes its linked to the previous post, sometimes in opposition or agreement with it or a mixture of both but I niether care about or look for agreement or disagreement as niether alters what I thought when I posted the post anyway as that moment has already passed

the only time it “needs” to be stated IMO is when the following post is a direct response to the preceeding one, but even then its usually obvious whether the poster agrees or disagrees anyway

[ubermik]

Whether I agree or disagree with you is irrelevant unless this board has been reclassified the “sunny board” and I wasnt notified

So aggreement, disagreement or just stating something totally unrelated to whatever you wrote is all good as I understand the nature of message boards to be

Just because a post is following yours doesnt necessarily mean its connected to, in response to, reply or even acknowledging the existence of your post as often the next post was being written while you posted it anyway so it wont have been seen until they post theirs

Whether or not you understand the post is also equally irrelevant, again because of it not being the “sunny board”

[ubermik]

One of the ironic whimsies of a psuedo wanna be socialist society tho is that they scream about peoples individual rights at the expense of the rights of the people that persons rights affect as well as not also making sure they take the responsibilities both personal and social that go with those rights

We have to jump through many hoops on a daily basis merely to drive a car, yet anyone however ill suited or qualified can breed even tho that act of breeding and procreating can have the most pervasive effect possible on their offsprings life, where are the yet to be born childrens “rights” being considered?

[ubermik]

I like short ones too, even some four letter ones

I’ve an equal opportunity typer :D :wink:

Anyway, our touchy feely victim pandering society will most probably mean that even if social services wanted to intervene when they return to the UK, even if they think they OUGHT to intervene when they return to the UK for the safety of the other kids they most probably wont do because of the media circus THAT would then create criticising the fact they did intervene when the poor distraught parents have just been through so much yada yada blah blah

[ubermik]

@fastcars wrote:

So do we call you MIKE the pompous cross dresser… :?:

or Michaela the raving lesbian who has a penchant for other womens arses… :?:

I prefer the more obvious choice but then my IQ is only very low eh… :wink:

Why are you asking me? Cant you make an unnaided decision?

And why do you think I care eitherway what you think or call me? Do you think you, your views or writings have any relevance to me whatsoever?

Its words on a website written by a complete stranger, some perspective eh?

And youre still not quite grasping the point at all are ya? Its “ONLINE”, what makes you think that even mike isnt part of the fabrication?

But just to dumb it down so you will understand it

If you check back I havent said anything whatsoever is false or true either way (check if you dont believe me lol), what I have said is you dont “know” whether it is or not, you dont know my gender, sexual orientation or whether I like marmite or not

What you THINK you know is via what I choose quite deliberately to write in a style of writing that equally deliberate for a specific reason. Some is acurate, some is false and some is omitted consistently across the board (excuse the pun)

So the point is you dont “know” anything, you summise, extrapolate and theorise based on what I choose to show and not on anything I dont, so as I said to begin with which you also seemed to go off on a tangent with, you dont “KNOW” anything, your own arrogance just makes you think you do

Which is shown pretty clearly by thinking you’ll get a reaction by questioning my sexual orientation for one lol, I’m just not that insecure soz lol

Which isnt the same

:lol:

[ubermik]

Isnt this pretty much the same point that was made right back at the beginning?

If the parents cant show anything resembling real and actual concern why the feck should anyone else be expected to?

The hype, fame and their 15 minutes of fame is tantamount to rewarding them for neglect when they seem to be lapping it up so fervently

[ubermik]

Its the internet DUH

Its full of people living out psuedo personas whether theyre aware of it or not as well as people portraying themselves as a different gender, sexuality, age or dress size for various reasons

But linking back to what I ACTUALLY said, you dont KNOW (read that word twice coz its important) that I’m male

But if I were falsely proporting to be then using a male name would be a pretty necessary step rather than proof otherwise dont ya think

As was discussed earlier in this thread, knowing is a fact based state, you dont “KNOW” anything at all about me, you only have what I choose to write and how I choose to write it to go on, all of which could be, and some of which most definitely is designed to misdirect

So if your IQ WAS higher I suspect you would know the meaning AND useage of the word “know”, which you obviously dont

[ubermik]

Well firstly you dont even know for sure I’m male to begin with brainiac

Secondly, the remark (were I male) would have been referencing cross dressing which isnt anything to do with being “gay”

Did you even register on the IQ scale or do you forego intellect when facts get in the way of an an eastenders standard of “snappy” comeback?

[Author]

Posts