[ubermik]

Like I care either way lol

[ubermik]

That bit got me, they are both in quite intellectually bound professions so one would assume they were a bit “cleva” like

Yet they seem to think “most” people wouldnt see them as negligent, that only a very tiny handful would see them as negligent with the rest seeing them as good parents who were “naive” :shock:

Naive to me is leaving a child in a locked car in eyesight whilst nipping into the garage to get some sweets, leaving them totally OUT of sight in an unlocked room in a foriegn country far surpases naive and clearly lands in selfish or at the very least painfully retarded to the point of being unfit to be responsible for kids territory

They are however very responsible parents, on that I totally agree, they are totally responsible for their self obsessed decisions, they are totally responsible for their decisions, they are totally responsible for putting their kids at risk and they are totally responsible for maddy going missing

And unless we are to assume that child abducters randomly wander around trying hotel room doors on the offchance that they will not only be locked, but that someone will have left a child or two innattended within I still cant even begin to rule out their complicitity in all of this

I’m actually surprised THEY are suprised people will be thinking like that really, if theyre so clever and well educated then surely they are capable of seeing how it must seem to onlookers or at least be aware some people would systematically have that suspicion based on how common its an actual fact

Had they said

“Well as much as I can see and understand why some people might think that I can assure you its not the case”

I would have thought that was a reasonable response

I dont however for one second think they would be unaware or even shocked to hear some people think that, so to behave as tho it was an odd or unusual thing for someone to think when I really dont think it is at all doesnt exactly swing me over to believing them, quite the opposite actually

[ubermik]

“think” obviously has more meanings than I was aware of then it seems :shock:

[ubermik]

What you “require” is as eroneously unimportant as your view on what you get really hun

Its a public message board, if you DONT want what you write to be dissagreed with, have its inconsistencies and contradictions pointed out or be responded to in a way that doesnt makes you feel all squishy inside then just dont post it to begin with

Simple really

Suppose Waspish HADNT wanted your response, would you care? Did you ask for permission? Make sure it was “ok” to respond?

So why on gods earth do you think you are so flippin special and deserve some kind of special treatment or acknowledgement of your delusional princess syndrome?

Its about as hypocritical as you can get nit picking someone else post with an essay and then boo frickety hoo-ing about someone then coming along and doing the same to your own lol

If you want a website where your posts are the only ones above criticism build it or buy it, because as far as I’m aware thats kind of the point on message boards really, as you clearly showed you enjoy when its YOU doing the posting but seem to have issues with it when its your posts that are under the microscope

“Dont dish out what you cant take”

its a SIMPLE philosophy, so I think you might feel right at home with it

[ubermik]

@rubyred wrote:

We have pensioners in 4 bedroom houses..

And?

Its their HOME

You mention several aspects of the derision of society, of the “pride” in some areas but not in others, but THEN you whinge about little old dears occupying houses that are too big for them

Well without that possibility and option you dont have a home, you have a place you are staying for now, that mindset is hardly one that would encourage pride either in the house or the area as it is transient and without any feeling of permanence

I personally think someone should be allowed to stay in a house they rent long term till THEY want to move out or until they have breached the terms they rent it under, they should be allowed to class it as a HOME rather than just a house, and to that end have no quibble with wrinklies taking up council houses, didnt when me and my ex were waiting for 8 years to get one and never will

Its not THEIR fault the councils couldnt manage a shagfest in a whorehouse, or that the government are more bothered about making more money for their country club chums than they are about creating a decent country for the people who pay their wages

Its their home and should be treated as such till THEY want to live elsewhere IMO

[ubermik]

Hmmm Brighton, the place where someone squeezing past you at the bar and asking if they can push your stool in strikes fear into the heart of even the most tattoed leather clad biker lol

The only town in Britain where Julian Clary is criticised because of his stereotypical macho neanderthol tone :lol:

The place where kebabs are banned for causing sexual tension amongst women on a night out

And where men are gay, women are men in dresses, and straight looking men are butch bull dykes looking for a she bitch

Oh what fun it must be to be beside the gayside :lol:

[ubermik]

I prefer the word fag, or the term “turd tapper” anyway lol :lol:

[ubermik]

Oh go on, just a few minutes more coz I’m nearly there now :shock:

How cruel :D

[ubermik]

The original point I made was that most women ARENT exceptional at BJ’s, infact most will tend to be about averageish with very poor and very exceptional being the minorities, that point you criticised and refuted

However, it its NOT the case then no man WOULD have to look for a woman who would be “understanding” because according to you they already are so “looking” should never ever be necessary should it? So why suggest it?

Fair ppint about it being a “sort of” serious discussion tho, and perhaps the reason your posts have seemed hystyrical, defensive and irrational is actually because you werent trying to sensibly and objectively discuss the topic in hindsight so that would be a mistake on my part

But what you have actually been disagreeing with is impirical data from studies and surveys performed over several decades including hundreds of thousands of people rather than my own person experience which hasnt been included in the discussion even once, so rather than me its hundreds of scientists sociologists, counsellors and various other proffessionals you’ve been accusing of talking nonsense, I was merely relaying their findings lol

Ho hum

[ubermik]

Oh yeah, one last point

Can you find a single sentence where I have mentioned MY sexual fulfillment?

As far as I knew it was an objective discussion on a general topic, or were you having a specifically subjective one then instead?

One persons experience is to any general topic like a raindrop in an ocean as far as relevance or preceedence is concerned and as such isnt indicative of anything other than their own miniscule personal experience of a broad and diverse topic so its hardly worth even including really as its a tad worthless

IE, if one person has a good sex life that doesnt mean millions dont, and vice versa

Similarly, the fact that SOME attractive people are considerate attentive lovers doesnt mean all the people who have found the opposite with many of them are lying, just that they have either dated totally different attractive people or have differing sexual preferences

Whereas you seem to be talking as tho one person, any person whos experience agrees with the view you already hold is proof of every single other person in a select sub category of mankind and that to say otherwise is just “wrong”

But then again, you also thought a picture of your lips was some indication of sexual prowess too didnt ya lol :wink:

[Author]

Posts