[ubermik]

But one of nostradamus’ most famous and theoirised quotes which isnt placed on a timeline tho was that “the end of the world will come when the yellow people rule the earth”

That has for decades been assumed to mean the chineese rather than signifying a pandemic outbreak of jaundice, and “rule the earth” could as much as any other meaning refer to financial dominance rather than an expansive invasionary one

It also doesnt say the “yellow people” will be the cause of this foretold ending of mankind, bbut merely references them in terms of when it could happen, and it could just as easily be a financially defunct USA deciding to nuke the slanty eyed little runts that caused the eextinction event rather than anything the nips did

[ubermik]

PMSL @ checking facts, what facts DID you check seeing as at no point did you mention dog fighting ISNT part of muslim culture, infact you EVEN went on to comment about “importing” such beasties lol, when dog fighting types is something we EXPORT whenever england are playing football elsewhere in the world

So what youre claiming is that you have already checked and KNOW dog fighting ISNT a muslim sport, and yet you dont actually manage to mention “what you see” at all, not even hint towards the article being just a bit wobbly in its facts but actually carry on as tho we shouldnt be “importing” anymore barbaric muslim dog fighters pmsl

Actually, seeing as this is the capital of the world where dogs fighting other dogs is concerned importing people with an interest in that sport would actually seem to be quite apt seeing as we invented that particular act of “barbarism” as we also did with concentration camps and many other forms of “barbaric” activity

As for watching sky news, are you REALLY so retarded you think the media is an isolated entity not directed by current government policy? lol

Just a couple of years ago storys like this were being regularly black balled and the only race related stories being allowed with any frequency were ones where nasty racist whities were persecuting poor ickle immigrants and ethnics

Now, not much time has passed, the government hasnt changed BUT public opinion has heavily swung against the immigration policy and looks set to be an election decider……

and miraculously the entire tone of the media towards ethnics has done a complete 180 degree U turn

Bit of a coincidence that dont you think?

[ubermik]

LOL, what utter bigotted uneducated tosh haha, where do you muppets get this trash from?

Firstly dog fighting has its origins in ancient rome where dogs were the first incarnation of gladiator, which was what they were actually called coincidentally

Every single culture has fought dogs against animals, mainly because most cultures have used them to hunt and as such they needed to be trained and tested on living prey

But the first, the very first instances of a dog being bred PURELY for fighting other dogs was,,,,,,,in the uk in the 18th and 19th century as most other cultures fought them against other animals for training rather than against each other purely for sport and betting

Dog fighting is still a reality in modernday “civilised” britain, by whites more so than any other ethnic group even tho its an underground sport nowadays. And most ethnic uses of dogs is for security or protection (IE corner shop owners (asians lol) and drug dealers (blacks haha)

Infact, if you actually check your facts muslims view dogs on a par with pigs, as dirty unholy creatures and many texts are available to instruct muslims on how to “cleanse” themselves if they have been close to or “allah forbid” touched by a dog

This story is even more comical because it wasnt so long ago there was a huge outcry because the police agreed to not use dogs to search asians houses unless everyone was evacuated and even then ONLY when there was no other choice unlike they will do for any other religious group of non religious person where they will often enter the premises with the dogs taking the lead position

So either this is completely ficticious, has been “embellished”, the people were just asian and were therefore (predictably) assumed to be muslims, or even claimed to be muslims when they most probably arent

Or its simply the media acting on what seems to be their current government directive to create and increase disdain and hatred for ethnic minorities, mainly asian ones in order to secure votes and therefore re-election

[ubermik]

The thing that makes nostradamus stand out from many other “prophets” is that his predictions for the most part follow a discernable timeline and can be dated prior to their occurence as has been done several times in the past

The question there tho obviously is whether the prediction could be absorbed by a loon who then makes it come true, or whether the act would have happened even if not predicted thus making it an actual prediction

Even with things like this, its possible that the prediction could be taken by some dictator to see it as a divine guarantee of success in some attempt at world domination or islamic world destruction and could therefore be the catalyst that makes an otherwise demonic ponderance end up being acted on, or as before it could have happened that way anyway whether nostradamus has predicted it or not

Without two different timelines and the ability to remove his predictions from one and not the other such things cant be adequately evaluated as to whether they are the cause of an act or an actual prediction of it

However, if someone denies the existence of god, the soul and anyother “mystical” nonsense and theorises that the universe and everything within it IS governed by mathematical laws and the laws of physics then time can be mathematically unveiled in either direction making it possible to see to any point in the future or past to a degree of acuracy directly proportional to the level of scientific knowledge of the universe at that point in time by an as yet impossible method of modelling called sub atomic progression theory

[ubermik]

@~Pebbles~ wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

Anyway. smokers and drinkers for the moment arent a good comparison, they pay in specified product taxes many times more into the system than illnesses that MIGHT be related to those habts cost, without them and their taxes the NHS would have crumbled decades ago

Overeaters on the other hand CANT make that claim and of the three groups are the only one that IS a financial drain to the NHS, the other two will have paid enough extra taxes for that indulgence to deserve private quality health care and a gold plated bed to recouperate in

its only fair then that the government impose a fat tax…the more you weigh, the more you pay :lol:

theyve been discussing it already as well as denying healthcare to fatties

Thing is tho, non fatties would en masse (pardon the huge wobbly pun), and the government know that, but it would be another fraudulent tax as with automobile taxes, beer tax, ciggy tax and most taxes

Fraudulent because it would be collected to cover the cost of additional healthcare costs, but would then be wasted on anything except the NHS which would then still be suffering under the weight……..(lol, soz couldnt resist haha) or weight related illnesses and the illnesses of related weighty people who they would then still try to deny care to anyway as has been suggested for smokers, drinkers and overeaters already

Which under any other guise whatsoever WOULD be called fraud, but when a government does it people seem to retarded to see it for what it is

[ubermik]

@sharongooner wrote:

Its quite ironic that Ive just started watchin a program on BBC3 about teenage boys who are anorexic!

The complete other end of the scale is that a lot of kids are now over obsessed with images of what they should look like.

My ten year old asked me today if he is fat :shock: he is tiny! well not really tiny but normal. I dont think I even gave my body image a thought at such a young age.

I was too busy having fun!

Then again he even uses deodrant….. think he is gonna be a handful :shock: :lol:

Dont panic too much about it until you start having Pabo and La Senza parcels arrive addressed to him lol :lol:

[ubermik]

Exstatically……or should that be orgasmically? :shock:

BRB when I’ve checked :wink:

[ubermik]

Anyway. smokers and drinkers for the moment arent a good comparison, they pay in specified product taxes many times more into the system than illnesses that MIGHT be related to those habts cost, without them and their taxes the NHS would have crumbled decades ago

Overeaters on the other hand CANT make that claim and of the three groups are the only one that IS a financial drain to the NHS, the other two will have paid enough extra taxes for that indulgence to deserve private quality health care and a gold plated bed to recouperate in

[ubermik]

Having morbidly obese kids should be classed as child abuse because thats exactly what it is

Being morbidly obese as an adult however is ONLY the fault of the obese person themselves

Its amazingly coincidental that we have such a plague of glandular problems in this country that miraculously cause weight gain without the person having to overeat :o ……..

WOW, shame the poor ickle africans and etheopians cant be injected with THAT magical gene innit?

The acid test for the cause of obesity is this, make someone go with nothing but water AND have to do two hours exercise a day for two weeks

If they lose weight then its linked to eating, if they gain weight or stay static then it isnt

Easy peasy

Anyone care to guess how many WOULDNT lose weight?

Zero perhaps?

[ubermik]

@sharongooner wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@sharongooner wrote:

The stats reveal that 2 year separation by consent is the most common reason for divorce. This is very misleading as the parties may have been married for years, but would have to prove to the court that they have lived separate lives for two years preceding issuing the divorce. So the public misunderstand this to mean they have only been married two years when that is not the case atall.

It is one of the most common grounds as the majority blatently lie and as its by consent there is no reason to question it. Mutually between couples who agree they can no longer live together chose this ground as its the simplist. And better than airing their dirty linen for the likes of me an my collegues to have a good old laugh about!

The unreasonable behaviour and adultery cases are equally as common in my opinion and certainly brighten up my day :)

I thought long and hard about getting married and working in my environment has certainly opened my eyes. Luckily we are happily married and I hope that continues.

The worse cases we see at the moment are children act cases between unmarried parents…. some of them are the pits, and you just dont wanna read them.

Actually nope, you are quite honestly the first person I have ever met or spoken too who even thinks anyone MIGHT not be able to know the difference between a two year separation and a marriage that lasts less than two years

The giveaway sign is the marriage that lasts less than two years ends within two years of starting for a start, its a bit of a giveaway really, so there wasnt any confusion here and lordy knows what kind of people you associate with if you DO think thats a common misconception :|

You made the comment that most marriages do not last two years ….. the figure is wrong!

Go figure….. :wink:

The most common GROUND for divorce is two year sep.

Not the most common reason for divorce or length of marriage. Which is 7 to 9 years.

And whilst on the subject the actual divorce rates have steadily fallen over the last 9 years to.

@ubermik wrote:

Many of the divorces we see dont last two years OF marriage

Although the words “many” and “most” both begin with M and are fairly close to each other in the dictionary that DOESNT imply they mean the same thing goony

And the phrase “two years OF marriage” was, I think, specific enough for it to be quite clear exactly what I was referring to

[Author]

Posts