[ubermik]

@sharongooner wrote:

WOW. Not thought of that before. By jings we are an imaginative bunch on here lol!!!!

DNA. On a very serious note, I was asked last year to “help police with their enquiries” had a note pushed through my door. A complimant slip with a PC’s number on it. Having good knowledge of Harlow Police (yep… town was flooded with reporters today after barrymores blood) I thought no point in ringing… that particular PC will be off duty by now.

Rang the next day from work (my place of work is a court for you that dont know), and having no knowledge of myself being in a crime in the last decade thought I was “doing my bit” … how naive was I.

I asked work boss if I could pop over to the police station in my lunch the next day to get it sorted, thinking maybe it was about being a witness to a crime (huge amount in my area), and they of course said yes.

I spent the rest of the afternoon being asked questions about my whereabouts on a particular date from 6 months beforehand. Like Im gonna know that. I cant remember yesterday most of the time. Funny enough the date she (female 17 year old pc) gave me I remembered. It was FA cup final day and we were up the pub watching my other halfs team lose :lol: . Not the point though.

Not until the end of my lunch time interview (all written down by hand by the pc) was I told what it was about.

Apparantly a minibus was stolen (I do not drive) and was found in a local area.

The police searced for clues as to who stole it.

They found an old fag but of mine.

Thats DNA!!!!!!!!

A whole day of my life worrying about what the fuck have they got on me, can they frame me with this? The answer……….

If I had not been at the pub laughing at my other chelsea supporting other half at losing the FA cup yes they bloody could have framed me….. Im just glad the date was a significant one.

Who knows what would have happened if I had no alibi/s?? :shock:

DNA is a fragment.

Ive not heard the word blood yet PB, but I hold you open to reveal where you read/heard that.

The Daily Express is the only paper going all out tomorrow and saying Maddies dead body was in that car.

They are either brave or stupid.

They’ve specifically said blood in all the reports I’ve seen so I cant see how you missed that, it was also blood that was found at the apartment too as I recall, and sky news for certain have been using the spefic word “blood” in their reporting all through as well who I doubt would be solitarily doing that

[ubermik]

@esmeralda wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@esmeralda wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@fastcars wrote:

@fastcars wrote:

Thats a fantastic idea PB…. lets bring them onto national TV… force them to confess to the worlds press that what they did was a huge mistake and how much they regretted it…. we could maybe stone them or even throw them into the local duck pond to see if they melt upon touching water…… maybe even hang them up on crosses held only by nails through their hands and feet … and if they then survive all this public hate and humility we can then take their other two children off them permanently just for good measure…. We could even build a huge JC bonfire where all the vultures from these boards could dance naked round effigies of the couple and stick pins in their eyes. Would make a fantastic media spectacle wouldnt it… :D

And all the time the real perpetrator of this sad act will be sitting back with a large cocktail… feet up and a huge smile on his face for a job well done.

@esmeralda wrote:

With few exceptions, you lot are the kind of sour-minded ghouls who would have been at the front of the queue to get a better look at a public execution. Shame, that the extent of your activities is limited to gleeful cyber-gloating at the tragedies and misfortunes of those failing to meet the exacting standards of your perfect selves. This forum invariably allows the likes of Bat and her ilk, to screech and holler at the latest miscreant who deserves at the very least a damn good garotting prior to getting even a whiff of judge and jury. A gaggle of haggling crones..urged on by PB’s Witchfinder General will descend on any hapless traveller veering from the path of righteousness, subjecting the opinionated scoundrel to a verbal burning at the stake whilst the hangers-on throw stones and slink about in the mud on their neanderthal hunkers.
A child has gone missing, the parents..whatever the circumstances (and I don’t for one second believe that the McCanns are in any way culpable)..will have to live the rest of their lives in despair. Show some FUC.KING compassion, you miserable shower of barstards!

You can see who the educated one is out of the two of us cant you… :lol:

Thats a trick question yeah?

Because an “educated” person would realise that niether innocence nor guilt can be “known” as theres no evidence to prove either, and that similarly innocence AND guilt are both just as likely possibilities

An educated person would therefore accept that to ascertain either innocence or guilt the parents HAVE to be scrutinised and investigated to establish which is the case

So therefore an “educated”, infact a “non moron” to be more acurate would know that they cant be above suspicion, that right from the start they are the ONLY real suspects and as such needed to be investigated thoroughly to either rule them out by proof or PROVE their guilt

An “educated” person would niether claim they did it nor that they didnt as niether is known, but would accept they quite possibly MIGHT have done it and also MIGHT not which is as positive a statement as can be acurately maintained by anyone bar the Mcanns

So maybe you need to look the word educated up in a dicheadtionary as you dont really seem to have the faintest idea what the word means lol

Just my uneducated opinion of course you understand :lol:

Hmm, you truly are thick if you are unable to assimilate that the contentious issue here concerns neither guilt nor innocence, but blood lust and schadenfreude. What a self important dolt you prove yourself to be, Uberprick.. the more so with every ill-conceived post. Keep ’em coming..I like a good snigger!

And yet STRANGELY enough the actual discussion IS about whether or not, in peoples personal opinions they think they are indeed guilty or innocent, a point of fact that resounds in pretty much every single post, a point of fact YOU seem to think isnt anything at all to do with the topic at all :shock: Funny that lol

I think before spouting empty headed diatribe you should first of all get your facts right tho, although I havent made a secret of the fact that I think they probably did have more to do with it and perhaps even deliberately killed her thats never, not once been expressed as “known”, and without that the phrase bloodlust is as out of place as a muslim at a bacon tasting contest

But as per with your sort where you cant actually contradict a point thats made and where you technically dont have a counter point you sink to the rather laughable level of throwing personal insults as tho an irrelevant person on a web sites opinion has any meaning whatsoever lol, bless

Point of fact here, the ONLY people exhibiting any narrow minded maliciously vehement misguided “bloodlust” are the criticisers of those who think they might have done it as they arent even capable of co-existing where someone has a differing opinion from theirs even when their opinion has no facts to support it and is therefore no more or less unfounded or proveable than any other opinion

But I doubt you will find a single post on any of these threads from people who think they might have done it whinging and whining about people having the view they are innocent

So it really is quite blatantly clear who the small minded insecure folks are just by that fact alone, otherwise they wouldnt be throwing such childish tizzy fits over the mere fact that the entire world doesnt agree with them

As for sniggering feel free, simple folks snigger at pretty much anything anyway so its hardly anything for me to be concerned about after all is it now?

As I say, Uberprick, your doltism flourishes with each and every post. For the hard of intelligence let me explain: The issue I was referring to was that of the malicious pleasure being taken in the misfortunes of others, by certain members of this forum and the delight with which you self-appointed members of the hang ’em and flog ’em judiciary hold court.
Don’t even think about trying to outsmart me uberprick..it can’t be done!

Yup, youre probably right as its bound to be impossible to outsmart the non smart

Butt that asside I havent seen anyone delighting in the misfortunes of others, more a case of being quite willing and eager to see misfortune befall those who deserve it as retribution for deeds done

So unless you would also class jailing a rapist for having raped someone (using your illogic) as ” the malicious pleasure being taken in the misfortunes of others” youre not really making a point at all are you? Because in both instances whats happening is people not baulking at, and IF justified AND proven being quite content for the guilty to be punished

Which is a far “smarter” stance really than people wanting the POSSIBLY guilty to be not only UNpunished if guilty, but to also be totally above any form of suspicion because why exactly? Because theyre parents? IS there such a thing as parental immunity that I havent heard of now?

Theres people ARE guilty of leaving kids unnattended, that is indisputeable, anyone who thinks thats either a trivial act or shouldnt be criticised is, in my opinion obviously a moral vaccuum devoid of any concept of parental responsibilities, right or wrong and lacks any acceptable degree of common sense and every parent, and I do mean EVERY parent who does leave children of that age SHOULD be punished, not just the Mcanns, ANY parent irrespective of whether any harm comes to their kids as a result as that should be a subsequent prosecution anyway as it doesnt detract from the initial crime

Wanting that punishment isnt by any stretch of a sick personality “malicious pleasure being taken in the misfortunes of others”, its wanting justice

And wanting someone who has killed or through neglect caused the death of their or anyone elses child for that too isnt “malicious pleasure being taken in the misfortunes of others” either

No amount of name calling or skirting around the undeniable facts here alters the undeniable facts despite what you seem to think

But dodging about calling people poo poo headsin lieu of posting any valid or tangible response to the stating of those facts says a lot more than anything you have actually written by far

And when you cant seem to even grasp the most rudimentary basic concepts such as crime and punishment repeatedly trying to claim how “clever” you percieve yourself to be doesnt really hold much water, and nor does wanting potentially guilty people to be totally above question really to be honest, quite the opposite infact

[ubermik]

@forumhostpb wrote:

Am I correct in thinking that if you are living on or receive Council Benefit payments, you can claim for ”necessary” living expenses (which would include the coat of home contents insurance)???

I never got a coat with my home contents insurance :shock: , not even a scarf the tight sods

[ubermik]

@esmeralda wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@fastcars wrote:

@fastcars wrote:

Thats a fantastic idea PB…. lets bring them onto national TV… force them to confess to the worlds press that what they did was a huge mistake and how much they regretted it…. we could maybe stone them or even throw them into the local duck pond to see if they melt upon touching water…… maybe even hang them up on crosses held only by nails through their hands and feet … and if they then survive all this public hate and humility we can then take their other two children off them permanently just for good measure…. We could even build a huge JC bonfire where all the vultures from these boards could dance naked round effigies of the couple and stick pins in their eyes. Would make a fantastic media spectacle wouldnt it… :D

And all the time the real perpetrator of this sad act will be sitting back with a large cocktail… feet up and a huge smile on his face for a job well done.

@esmeralda wrote:

With few exceptions, you lot are the kind of sour-minded ghouls who would have been at the front of the queue to get a better look at a public execution. Shame, that the extent of your activities is limited to gleeful cyber-gloating at the tragedies and misfortunes of those failing to meet the exacting standards of your perfect selves. This forum invariably allows the likes of Bat and her ilk, to screech and holler at the latest miscreant who deserves at the very least a damn good garotting prior to getting even a whiff of judge and jury. A gaggle of haggling crones..urged on by PB’s Witchfinder General will descend on any hapless traveller veering from the path of righteousness, subjecting the opinionated scoundrel to a verbal burning at the stake whilst the hangers-on throw stones and slink about in the mud on their neanderthal hunkers.
A child has gone missing, the parents..whatever the circumstances (and I don’t for one second believe that the McCanns are in any way culpable)..will have to live the rest of their lives in despair. Show some FUC.KING compassion, you miserable shower of barstards!

You can see who the educated one is out of the two of us cant you… :lol:

Thats a trick question yeah?

Because an “educated” person would realise that niether innocence nor guilt can be “known” as theres no evidence to prove either, and that similarly innocence AND guilt are both just as likely possibilities

An educated person would therefore accept that to ascertain either innocence or guilt the parents HAVE to be scrutinised and investigated to establish which is the case

So therefore an “educated”, infact a “non moron” to be more acurate would know that they cant be above suspicion, that right from the start they are the ONLY real suspects and as such needed to be investigated thoroughly to either rule them out by proof or PROVE their guilt

An “educated” person would niether claim they did it nor that they didnt as niether is known, but would accept they quite possibly MIGHT have done it and also MIGHT not which is as positive a statement as can be acurately maintained by anyone bar the Mcanns

So maybe you need to look the word educated up in a dicheadtionary as you dont really seem to have the faintest idea what the word means lol

Just my uneducated opinion of course you understand :lol:

Hmm, you truly are thick if you are unable to assimilate that the contentious issue here concerns neither guilt nor innocence, but blood lust and schadenfreude. What a self important dolt you prove yourself to be, Uberprick.. the more so with every ill-conceived post. Keep ’em coming..I like a good snigger!

And yet STRANGELY enough the actual discussion IS about whether or not, in peoples personal opinions they think they are indeed guilty or innocent, a point of fact that resounds in pretty much every single post, a point of fact YOU seem to think isnt anything at all to do with the topic at all :shock: Funny that lol

I think before spouting empty headed diatribe you should first of all get your facts right tho, although I havent made a secret of the fact that I think they probably did have more to do with it and perhaps even deliberately killed her thats never, not once been expressed as “known”, and without that the phrase bloodlust is as out of place as a muslim at a bacon tasting contest

But as per with your sort where you cant actually contradict a point thats made and where you technically dont have a counter point you sink to the rather laughable level of throwing personal insults as tho an irrelevant person on a web sites opinion has any meaning whatsoever lol, bless

Point of fact here, the ONLY people exhibiting any narrow minded maliciously vehement misguided “bloodlust” are the criticisers of those who think they might have done it as they arent even capable of co-existing where someone has a differing opinion from theirs even when their opinion has no facts to support it and is therefore no more or less unfounded or proveable than any other opinion

But I doubt you will find a single post on any of these threads from people who think they might have done it whinging and whining about people having the view they are innocent

So it really is quite blatantly clear who the small minded insecure folks are just by that fact alone, otherwise they wouldnt be throwing such childish tizzy fits over the mere fact that the entire world doesnt agree with them

As for sniggering feel free, simple folks snigger at pretty much anything anyway so its hardly anything for me to be concerned about after all is it now?

[ubermik]

@sharongooner wrote:

Boinkable…. now there’s a word…. 8)

You dont wanna be living next to one (like I do).

On the upside though… every but of metallic rubbish I put out and book up the heavy squad to come and remove miraculously dissapears before they come.

Ive made friends with quite a lot of them and they have promised not to drive stolen cars down my street and park them outside my house and set fire to them any more.

Look, I’m probably not the first person to say this but,,,,,,

Having other trailers next to yours isnt exactly whats meant by “living next door to one”, thats what the people in the houses SURROUNDING the park are supposed to say haha :lol:

[ubermik]

Anyway, I think as a nation we have a very real need for trailer parks to be honest as with the amount of single parents we have and the negative impact feminism has had on our society we have a rapidly dwindling amount of half decent boinkable sluts which seem to be a thing that are quite prevalent on trailer parks if television is to be believed (which of course NEVER lies to us lol)

So I’m all for them obviously :lol: :lol:

[ubermik]

Thats actually a fair point goony, I’ve heard a few people say that council contents insurance is unbelievably cheap but I also know countless people who have always been council tenants who didnt even know they provided the facility too so I dont think its quite as transparent as you make it sound

And non council contents insurance is nowadays ridiculously priced and is well outside the income of not only people on benefits alone, but also those who are working single parents and couples with kids who are on or are near minimum wage as the premiums have skyrocketed far outside inflation from when I first started having it 20 ish years ago and £30,000 worth of cover for all risks with new for old replacement used to cost me £40 a year

But aside from that there seems to be a “tenants mentality”, I’ve been fitting burglar alarms for most of the last 25 years and frequently even now have people say “well we never had/wont have one because its not OUR house” lol, which considering an alarm is ONLY to protect the contents of the house along with the people living in it really amounts to a rather moronic standpoint on the issue which probably extends to the topic of contents insurance too I would expect

[ubermik]

@fastcars wrote:

@fastcars wrote:

Thats a fantastic idea PB…. lets bring them onto national TV… force them to confess to the worlds press that what they did was a huge mistake and how much they regretted it…. we could maybe stone them or even throw them into the local duck pond to see if they melt upon touching water…… maybe even hang them up on crosses held only by nails through their hands and feet … and if they then survive all this public hate and humility we can then take their other two children off them permanently just for good measure…. We could even build a huge JC bonfire where all the vultures from these boards could dance naked round effigies of the couple and stick pins in their eyes. Would make a fantastic media spectacle wouldnt it… :D

And all the time the real perpetrator of this sad act will be sitting back with a large cocktail… feet up and a huge smile on his face for a job well done.

@esmeralda wrote:

With few exceptions, you lot are the kind of sour-minded ghouls who would have been at the front of the queue to get a better look at a public execution. Shame, that the extent of your activities is limited to gleeful cyber-gloating at the tragedies and misfortunes of those failing to meet the exacting standards of your perfect selves. This forum invariably allows the likes of Bat and her ilk, to screech and holler at the latest miscreant who deserves at the very least a damn good garotting prior to getting even a whiff of judge and jury. A gaggle of haggling crones..urged on by PB’s Witchfinder General will descend on any hapless traveller veering from the path of righteousness, subjecting the opinionated scoundrel to a verbal burning at the stake whilst the hangers-on throw stones and slink about in the mud on their neanderthal hunkers.
A child has gone missing, the parents..whatever the circumstances (and I don’t for one second believe that the McCanns are in any way culpable)..will have to live the rest of their lives in despair. Show some FUC.KING compassion, you miserable shower of barstards!

You can see who the educated one is out of the two of us cant you… :lol:

Thats a trick question yeah?

Because an “educated” person would realise that niether innocence nor guilt can be “known” as theres no evidence to prove either, and that similarly innocence AND guilt are both just as likely possibilities

An educated person would therefore accept that to ascertain either innocence or guilt the parents HAVE to be scrutinised and investigated to establish which is the case

So therefore an “educated”, infact a “non moron” to be more acurate would know that they cant be above suspicion, that right from the start they are the ONLY real suspects and as such needed to be investigated thoroughly to either rule them out by proof or PROVE their guilt

An “educated” person would niether claim they did it nor that they didnt as niether is known, but would accept they quite possibly MIGHT have done it and also MIGHT not which is as positive a statement as can be acurately maintained by anyone bar the Mcanns

So maybe you need to look the word educated up in a dicheadtionary as you dont really seem to have the faintest idea what the word means lol

Just my uneducated opinion of course you understand :lol:

[ubermik]

We already have trailer parks, its just that people dont pay much attention to them because they are populated mostly by the elderly and are under the guise of ordinary caravan parks so its not really a big deal

But are you sure this isnt just a temporary thing until their actual homes are repaired? Because this idea has been put forward many times in the past as a low cost way of housing immigrant workers and asylum seekers but has been thrown out just as many times for being classed as “impoper housing below the standards these people should expect”

So it would be quite ironic if we think it IS a suitable standard for our own home grown folksies lol

[ubermik]

@bat wrote:

@forumhostpb wrote:

@esmeralda wrote:

……….A child has gone missing, the parents..whatever the circumstances (and I don’t for one second believe that the McCanns are in any way culpable)..will have to live the rest of their lives in despair. Show some FUC.KING compassion, you miserable shower of barstards!

Speaking on behalf of Witchfinder Generals eveywhere …….. well whoopy doo for the McCanns. They’ll have to live the rest of their lives in despair??? Really ???? I see no evidence of it so far.

They bask in the glow of the Media spotlight daily; their every word is reported and conveyed to the whole world; they are the centre of attention wherever they go; they jet from continent to continent meeting celebrities; they’ve had a personal audience with the Pope; the rich and famous rush to pledge support for them; over a million pounds has been donated for their cause;……. yup, they’ve had it real tough so far huh?

I’ll feel all the compassion in the world for poor little Maddie – who, remember, has done NOTHING to deserve her fate – her parents can rot in hell for all I care and I’ll not shed a tear.

In fact I sincerely hope that the Liverpool social services get off their fat bums and take the remaining two children into care, in case the McCanns decide to abandon them as well in order to go out on the piss.

Exactly. I like how McCann senior managed to squeeze out a few tears for the press at the airport when they arrive home. I wonder how many tears Maddie squeezed out before she met her fate eh?

Well I suppose that the police net closing in and causing you to end your never ending holiday AND then have to skulk back home and face the scorn of the righteously disgusted as well as social services would be enough to make anyone cry at least a little bit, not to mention they will probably have to go back to work AND spend at least the odd occassion looking after their remaining kids now lol

What a culture shock for the poor things eh? :lol:

[Author]

Posts