[ubermik]

@slayer wrote:

It is exceptionally generic not to say naive to suggest most millionaires have failed their way to the top!

Well maybe you should point that out to the countless millionairs who in their biographies talk about all the failures they had to contend with, tell them theyre lying and dont know what theyre talking about lol, I’m sure you’ll get a super reception

@slayer wrote:

Wrong? Learning from failure and applying that knowledge to prevent future mistakes I can accept,

“learning from failure”??? Do you mean the failures you just said they dont make? The ones it was naive to suggest they have made? THOSE failures? Or are you trying to claim that learning from a failure somehow magically goes back in time and stops it being a failure to begin with haha

Hmmmm, theres nothing like consistency, and that IS “nothing” at all like consistency lol

@slayer wrote:

but simply failing consistently as if blindly blundering around directionless will no more make you a millionaire than the lotto.

Erm, where did I said “blindly blundering around directionless”? Bet ya cant show it can ya? lol

Try reading whats ACTUALLY written rather than what you would have preferred to have been written for a change eh? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Infact more specifically I said quite the opposite of that if you’d bothered to actually read what you were miserably failing to reiterate

[ubermik]

@fastcars wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@r.O.T.T wrote:

in the 21st century
does it matter

More specifically tho, yes it matters

Because if being gay was ONLY genetic then it could be tested for at the foetal change, the causes of it could be identified and either avoided or corrected if the parents to be would prefer a normal child as well as it possibly being hereditary meaning it could be avoided by the selection of better partners where having a gay child was or wasnt wanted

If on the other hand it was found to be enviromental this would be important to separated parents who didnt want their kids “turned” gay by their gay ex and also a consideration of people putting their kids up for adoption and social services when finding foster parents and adoptive parents surely?

And those are just the areas it might “matter” that sprung to mind without really trying to find some so I am sure there will be loads more reasons why it might matter

Wasnt it Hitler that first tried to clone the perfect human race?

Not cloning as far as I know, just selective breeding which has to various degrees been done and is still being done by every civilisation and culture the world over in one way or another

There are already a whole host of hereditary diseases that put carriers off breeding so as to not risk inflicting it on their child, and I am pretty sure if being gay was found to be caused by genetics many people would avoid passing that gene on too

[ubermik]

@forumhostpb wrote:

Yes but sending them into space is a lot better that the American practice called (I believe) feltching.

True, one is sending the gerbils where no man has gone before, the other is sending them where loads of men have not just gone, but cum too lol

Although space has black holes too, theyre just not as hairy or smelly

Butt, arsuppose both could be classed as exploring the outer rim :lol: :lol: and for the turd time :lol:

[ubermik]

@~Pebbles~ wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@~Pebbles~ wrote:

The Russian space agency has blasted ten gerbils into space for a 12-day mission to test the possible effects on humans of a flight to Mars. Hmmm I think I see a flaw in their thinking here, how exactly will sending Gerbils into space tell us anything at all about HUMANS?

Apparantly sand gerbils can live for a month without using liquid, well theres the first thing we DONT have in common with them.

Seems like a pointless and cruel excerise to me :twisted:

But we regularly send humans into space too dont we? So how is it cruel to do it to gerbils but not humans?

And many people are queueing up to pay millions of dollars to go into space, yet these gerbils can go for free

Sounds pretty rodentalicious really

Pointing out the obvious here, humans choose to go into space, the gerbils have been locked in a cage and blasted off, and on their return will be disected. Hardly what I would call a holiday.

Yeah but youre not a gerbil tho are ya? You dont fill your mouth with nuts (well maybe two if youre into teabagging of course) and you wont spend monotonous hours running on a little wheel in a cage

So how do you know that to a gerbil the chance to crap in zero gravity isnt an ace holiday away from their usual gravity ridden prison, a holiday they might not mind being dissected afterwards for lol

Even people on death row often reach a point where they prefer the end result of their sentence to the constant imprisonment, maybe gerbils are the same lol :D

Anyway, some people like going camping, and compared to that 12 days in space followed by dissection seems like a far less painful experience I reckon hehe

As for it being pointless, to an african villager I am sure building a railway or hospital would seem pointless, as they arent sufficiently socially evolved or conversant to understand the relevance

So just because sending gerbils into space seems pointless to you doesnt equate to it being so

[ubermik]

OMG lol

Lobotomised retards must look down on you then if you think thats “looking down” on someone :lol: :lol: :lol:

Since when has a statement of fact been either negative or positive? And even more intriguingly when as I DID point out, when its actually stated by the person themselves to begin with

You will struggle to find a single “success” who hasnt failed repeatedly on their way to that success, its part of the process majoratively. a process most people wimp out of after a few failures hence why only a very small percentage of people ever attain any degree of massive accomplishment

Wanting to feel as tho you have a reason to be able to “look down” on people seems more up your alley really ROTT, but no matter how much you might try to dim someone elses light it doesnt make yours shine any brighter, it just feels like it does for a short time

[ubermik]

@r.O.T.T wrote:

@forumhostpb wrote:

So the ‘grinning pullover’ is throwing good money after bad.

A fool and his money are easily parted.

yea hes a real bankrupt clown

Yeah, this is the same shrewd judge of character that thought his charisma and none profit making approach would secure him the lottery contract without the need to give bribes, the man who believed officials when they told him he would have his virgin railways franchises renewed without having to up his bid so he invested in more trains 6 months before the same officials gave several of his lines to higher bidders (lets pretend no bribes were given eh?)

Yes he has made a fortune, but as with most people who have made a fortune he isnt without many and massive mistakes and errors in judgement

Most millionaires have quite literally “failed their way to the top” as the real way to make a success is to keep trying no matter how many times you fail miserably whereas the majority will quit after a few quite minor failures

So someone being “loaded” isnt a sign they are infallible, if you read a few “successful” peoples memoirs and biographies you will see they usually have a long line of complete cock ups behind them, larger and more numerous than most people cummulate in a lifetime, but they just werent deterred by them

[ubermik]

@Mrs Clean wrote:

Children need to be loved, and as long as they have a secure and loving home, does it really matter?

I’m sure a lot of alcoholics and drug users “love” their kids wholeheartedly, so is love alone going to give their kids a good stable balanced start in life?

If not then yeah, course its important as we dont know what, if any negatives could be associated with being raised in a same sex enviroment and its not “PC” for anyone to try and find out at the moment

[ubermik]

@johnboy25 wrote:

What is a gay face and/or a gay voice? It’s the kind of thing that wins you bets like ‘£20 says Will Young bats for the other team’

Simple, what other explenation is needed?!

Quick edit – this was long before the ‘Exclusive’ news about his sexuality. I could have told them much sooner and for much less than what he must have got paid for the story.

See now I would have actually classed him as having a “people with money”, private educated, blue blood sort of face personally

Which I suppose also leads to the very likely chance he’s a turd tapping schlong jockey too lol

[ubermik]

Objectively tho, is there a downside here?

So france goes and blows the crap out of a hardline fundaMENTAList Islamic country that MIGHT be working towards having nuclear weapons

Many of the surrounding countries are just as nervous of that possibility too as Iran is far from a cool headed stable regime unlikely to launch said weapons if they were attained, so the war on Islam isnt likely to escalate too severely if Iran was attacked

And in retalliation Iran would probably start suicide bombing France to the hilt

So in the final analysis tens of thousands of Iranian Muslimists get splodged and the country gets bombed back to the dark ages, where lets face it the Muslims think we should all still be anywhere, and into the bargain hundreds, perhaps thousands of french people get explosively dismantled or a bad case of the bio weapon fatal shakes

As I dont actually know any Iranians or French people personally I couldnt really care less either way whether they do or dont annihallate each other, one of the upsides would be that our fishing quotas would increase were france to be decimated and fish and chips would be cheaper, so it seems to have plus points on both sides really

[ubermik]

I wonder if they will try to attack by sea by sending in commando frog men? :lol:

[Author]

Posts