[ubermik]

@*Sian wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@*Sian wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@*Sian wrote:

:lol: Please forgive me… A few too many G&T’s 8) :lol:

LOL, fairy snuff then, but you ARE sure you remembered the “T” rather than just adding two G’s instead arent ya? :wink: :lol: :lol:

More g’s than t’s admittedly… :oops: No need to be an uberfuck though :lol:

Well sadly we dont have much choice about the things we excel at, so I cant help being an uberfuck :S

Peeling ecstaticly orgasmic women off the ceiling gets so tiresome after a while, but we all have our crosses to bear I suppose :lol:

Don’t flatter yourself :lol:

Flattery? Accentuated or exagerated niceity? :o

Oh but I wasnt :wink: :wink: :twisted: :lol:

[ubermik]

@*Sian wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@*Sian wrote:

:lol: Please forgive me… A few too many G&T’s 8) :lol:

LOL, fairy snuff then, but you ARE sure you remembered the “T” rather than just adding two G’s instead arent ya? :wink: :lol: :lol:

More g’s than t’s admittedly… :oops: No need to be an uberfuck though :lol:

Well sadly we dont have much choice about the things we excel at, so I cant help being an uberfuck :S

Peeling ecstaticly orgasmic women off the ceiling gets so tiresome after a while, but we all have our crosses to bear I suppose :lol:

[ubermik]

@*Sian wrote:

:lol: Please forgive me… A few too many G&T’s 8) :lol:

LOL, fairy snuff then, but you ARE sure you remembered the “T” rather than just adding two G’s instead arent ya? :wink: :lol: :lol:

[ubermik]

@*Sian wrote:

Not what I have heard!

:shock:

Damn, for a second then I was having flashbacks to my kids trying to bicker when they were aged 6 or 7

What next? Are you going so say ner ner na ner ner and call me a poo poo head?

If “not what I’ve heard” was the best response I could think of in an exchange with anyone over the age of 10 I’d personally choose to not bother responding at all than to respond with such a childish lacklustre retort lol

But I guess everyone has to stick to their own level eh?

[ubermik]

@*Sian wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@*Sian wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@*Sian wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@waspish wrote:

@*Sian wrote:

I watched some of it… Nothing I didn’t already know… all our resourses are used helping others rather than our own.

We have a polish invasion where I live no longer can you talk your own tongue and be understood. Plap!

I notice that in one town in lincoln the population is one third immigrant workers mainly young men. sureley this is wrong its a recipe for disaster ?

Which is worse tho? An immigrant workforce made up of single people or one made up of married people with a tribe of kids and elderly relatives in tow?

IF, we need A person to fill a job thats all we need, ONE person, not an army of benefit sucking leeches and hangers on all requiring education and health care

ONE job – ONE person

Hardly rocket science

Well I have used the benifts system in the past… that is what it is there for but not for immigrants and assylum seekers who by the way are meant to go to the FIRST country of safty… not over border after border to get some free money :twisted:

But they ARE going to the first country of “safty” you silly moo :lol: :lol: :lol:

No other country in the world is anywhere near as “saft” with tax payers money as this one lol

Less of the moo ya numbnut! – :lol: You know what I mean!!!

OOps :shock: :o

That must have been a fresian slip :lol: :lol: :lol:

If the cap fits!!!

I dont have a cervix, so it wouldnt fit

[ubermik]

@*Sian wrote:

So what!

I dont have a “so”ing machine, so so your own what :P :lol:

[ubermik]

@*Sian wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@*Sian wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@waspish wrote:

@*Sian wrote:

I watched some of it… Nothing I didn’t already know… all our resourses are used helping others rather than our own.

We have a polish invasion where I live no longer can you talk your own tongue and be understood. Plap!

I notice that in one town in lincoln the population is one third immigrant workers mainly young men. sureley this is wrong its a recipe for disaster ?

Which is worse tho? An immigrant workforce made up of single people or one made up of married people with a tribe of kids and elderly relatives in tow?

IF, we need A person to fill a job thats all we need, ONE person, not an army of benefit sucking leeches and hangers on all requiring education and health care

ONE job – ONE person

Hardly rocket science

Well I have used the benifts system in the past… that is what it is there for but not for immigrants and assylum seekers who by the way are meant to go to the FIRST country of safty… not over border after border to get some free money :twisted:

But they ARE going to the first country of “safty” you silly moo :lol: :lol: :lol:

No other country in the world is anywhere near as “saft” with tax payers money as this one lol

Less of the moo ya numbnut! – :lol: You know what I mean!!!

OOps :shock: :o

That must have been a fresian slip :lol: :lol: :lol:

[ubermik]

@Bad Manners wrote:

@pikey wrote:

It’s all bobbins anyway. In France, the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, part of the French constitution, says “Everyone is supposed innocent until having been declared guilty.” Similarly, the code of criminal procedure declares “any suspected or prosecuted person is presumed to be innocent until their guilt has been established”.

I was just gonna point out the same thing. Beat me to it.
:wink:

Point what out exactly? Dont you need an actual point in the first place to “point” something out?

You seem to be circling around this rather eroneous concept of judiciary like a fatty circling a chocolate dispenser with no change, as tho if you do it for long enough the status quo might change

Find the bit where is says someone is “above suspicion or investigation UNTIL proven guilty” and you would actually have the makings of a relevant point to extract from the essence of the law, but until you do find a passage that says that your trying to weave gold out of straw with it as someone being “innocent in the eyes of the law” until proven guilty doesnt mean they arent guilty, merely that it hasnt been proven yet and might not be, it also DOESNT mean they arent open for suspicion, theorisation, investigation or any other supposition or scrutiny of their possible guilt

A lack of the proof of guilt also ISNT proof of innocence, only proof of innocence is proof of innocence

So, the same passage is also saying that

“Although classed as innocent until proven otherwise, all people ARE potentially guilty until proven innocent” too

Whereas quite a few dimwits on here seem to think being innocent until proven guilty equates to being above the law, suspicion or investigation until proven guilty lol,

which is on a par with the acuracy of how a retarded 10 year old would try to reference einsteins theory of relativity having heard it only once before in a language they didnt even speak :lol: :lol: :lol:

[ubermik]

@~Pebbles~ wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@~Pebbles~ wrote:

anyone who breaks into someone elses home deserves all they get in my opinion

Dvd’s, camcorders, cameras, cash, mobile phones, I-Pods, games consoles etc etc etc etc

:lol:

i was thinking more along the lines of a black eye, broken limbs etc :wink:

I know lol, but my response was funnier :lol:

[ubermik]

@*Sian wrote:

I have been in a “have a go” situation… I was 7 months pregnant with my eldest, we lived in a very well to do area but not so far away was a chav city, I donned my dressing gown and went to stick one in the wanker to my dissappointment he fled out of the conservatory door never to been seen again … everyone should have a go, it’s a right!

And yet I fitted an alarm for someone I went to school form someone who had spent 8 years in the forces (infantry), was an accomplished boxer, taught Ju-Jitsu as well as supplementing his income doing occassional debt collecting that needed to be done outside the legal system and had always leaned towards being a bit of a thug right since his teens

His partner called me back about a year after the alarm was installed to upgrade it and thats when I found out than when he’d heard a noise, picked up a police truncheon (the new extendable type) and toddled off to make the intruder regret it he’d trodden on broken glass they’d placed on the stairs incase anyone came down, fell to the bottom and was then set about by four people with iron bars and crow bars the curved hook of which had lodged between two of the ribs they hadnt managed to break and was still firmly stuck there when the police arrived

Burglars nowadays arent of the “fair cop guv” variety of a few decades ago, rather than running off if confronted even by a little old lady many are not only willing, but also prepared to aggressively avoid capture nowadays, so “having a go” isnt quite the romanticised notion many seem to deludedly think it is and in many cases will end up being the last thing that particular home owner will EVER “have a go” at

[Author]

Posts