Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 91 through 100 (of 929 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #290126

    It doesnt matter which party is in power, modern politics isnt about results, its about psychology and misdirection

    The sick, the elderly, the young, the unemployed, the mentally ill. single mums, 4×4 drivers, smokers, drinkers, drivers, racists, immigrants, men, fathers, the french, the EU, terrorists etc etc are just some of the lists to blame for all of societies woes to distract the mindless majority away from realising the real reason the place is such a cesspit is the governments endless wastage of money

    UK politics has been americanised over the last few decades, politicians now keep redirecting disdain towards a group who arent a significant amount of votes to lose and paint them blacker than black, then a few months later all the countries woes become the fault of another group on the list and so on whilst the bulk of the non thinking non questioning populace criticise who they are told to dislike and welcome with glee any policy that “sticks it to the scum” as long as that months scum isnt a group theyre part of

    But a government cant really be blamed for doing that, infact they would be stupid not to when its obvious they can. The blame unfortunately rests with the apathy of the majority for sitting idly by and letting them do it

    #289244

    @emmalush wrote:

    The 10 year old is not a thug for verbally bashing someone, the immigrant is the thug for assult.

    And i hope a immigrant assults all of you who defend this particular one/attack the young lad. It would be so funny to hear you then say, hold on a min, this immigration policy has goten out of hand :lol:

    Only when it “hits” you personally (and it inevitably will), is when you take note.

    And I wonder how your view might change when youre gang raped and happy slapped almost to death by a gang of white english teenagers whos single mothers half assed parenting hadnt taught them to know any better

    Lets see how you would try and blame immigrants for that

    #289240

    @token_male wrote:

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    …. and if they don’t we should cave their heads in with iron bars !!!

    as much as im against the iron bar approach i do think that if a kid is being gobby due to bad parenting then they deserve a slap across the back of the head!

    call me old fashioned

    I think thats totally shocking, idiotic and barbaric :shock: :shock: :shock:

    I wonder what the police would say about such statements?…….

    Well, I asked a mate who is one and we came to the conclusion that rubber hoses are much better :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    #289486

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    No … like you, I make it all up as I go along – or copy & paste it from the BNP website.

    PMSL

    BNP? Burly numpties perving? Brigades nighttime pursuits? Bumboys naughy poking? :lol: :lol: :lol:

    #289235

    @slayer wrote:

    @ubermik wrote:

    @slayer wrote:

    @ubermik wrote:

    IF, and its an important if, you CAN with any sense or validity claim that NO white english person would EVER have reacted to a scumbag little scrote in this way, THEN, and ONLY then does this become anything whatsoever to do with race or immigration

    As I know many white british people WOULD react in this exact same way then it isnt a racial issue except to racists

    Absolute total and utter bullcrud

    To present a supposition which states that “its only racist if NO other white english person would react in the same way” is simply beyond the boundaries of barking

    It is an irrelevance what ANY other individual would have done- the child hurls an object (fruit I think) and states “go back to where you came from” to a Slovakian. It is nonsensical to suggest unless theres not one single white english person who wouldnt have beaten him, its not a rascist remark.

    Just because I’d have beaten him too doesnt mean it’s not rascist- white english people can also be offended by remarks made about others- you dont have to be a minority to be offended by racism!

    @ubermik wrote:

    Obviously what he said was a racist comment, but the basic scenario is simply that he insulted someone, had the woman been a white english woman dressed like a slut and he had made a comment about her being a prozzie the exact same thing could have happened and the incident wouldnt have THEN been about prositutes would it?

    No, it wouldnt have been about prostitutes but I’d guarrantee the remark would have been classed as sexist….just as this remark was classed as racist

    I didnt say the “remark” wasnt racist (although strictly speaking it isnt as slovakians are of the same race, and “go home” isnt a racist comment unless directed at someone of a DIFFERENT race)

    I said the incident wasnt linked to immigration, but immigration was the main gist of the padding, which was ONLY because the woman was slovakian, its THAT which is racist as it doesnt even say the woman IS an immigrant

    All of which was clearly stated with no mention to what was said

    And yes the other analogy WOULD have been classed as sexist, the remark that is

    But this thread isnt mostly about “the remark” is it? Infact it doesnt concentrate on the remark at all bar stating what it is

    But would a thread and the article about it in the other scenario do you reckon have not been about what was said, not been about the beating but instead wittered on about why prostitution was the solitary reason for british society crumbling and why prostitutes should all be “sent back” so that more beatings of cheeky little b’stards wouldnt happen claiming the beating was because of prostitutes?

    Because inference for inference that would be the gist of that thread IF that had been the reason the woman had hit the kid

    Course not, the article and thread would more probably have been centred around the beating, the kid being cheeky and the wrongness of both things

    This one however mostly avoids both of those things, almost having the undertone that the kid did nothing wrong and focusing almost totally on the topic of immigration which doesnt specifically relate to this incident at all as far as can be known as it doesnt even say the woman IS an immigrant does it

    Merely that she is slovakian

    Were ALL slovakians walking around beating kids because that was what ALL slovakians did all the time THEN it might be about immigration

    If the childs insult was a bigot byproduct of a slutty single mums bigotry then it would be about piss poor single parenting

    But it still remains that what has happened here is the child insulted someone who reacted to that insult

    It could have been another person and a different insult with the same reaction

    The fact the woman is or might be an immigrant, the current crappy state of our immigration proceedures and most of the other nonsense soapboxed on the coat tails of this story isnt relevant to the crime or the circumstances of it

    Assault on or by someone isnt less or more simply because of their nationality and niether is the significance of the boys nationality as to whether he should be insulting people and throwing things

    Unless of course youre going to claim that its ok for white british kids to insult anyone non british and that its worse if a non british person beats the crap out of a gobby kid than if a white person did it

    If youre NOT going to try and claim either of those things then the nationality becomes irrelevant and only the actual occurence is important irrespective of nationality as the actual occurences are important whereas the state of immigration policy on a national level or even a community one ISNT relevant to this individual incident which is the point I have been making

    As national and community immigration makes up probably 90% of the article with the incident itself making up a rather measly amount of it

    #289232

    @slayer wrote:

    @ubermik wrote:

    IF, and its an important if, you CAN with any sense or validity claim that NO white english person would EVER have reacted to a scumbag little scrote in this way, THEN, and ONLY then does this become anything whatsoever to do with race or immigration

    As I know many white british people WOULD react in this exact same way then it isnt a racial issue except to racists

    Absolute total and utter bullcrud

    To present a supposition which states that “its only racist if NO other white english person would react in the same way” is simply beyond the boundaries of barking

    It is an irrelevance what ANY other individual would have done- the child hurls an object (fruit I think) and states “go back to where you came from” to a Slovakian. It is nonsensical to suggest unless theres not one single white english person who wouldnt have beaten him, its not a rascist remark.

    Just because I’d have beaten him too doesnt mean it’s not rascist- white english people can also be offended by remarks made about others- you dont have to be a minority to be offended by racism!

    If you check back and read that excert in context I was referring to the droves of droning about immigration rather than whether what he said was racist

    Obviously what he said was a racist comment, but the basic scenario is simply that he insulted someone, had the woman been a white english woman dressed like a slut and he had made a comment about her being a prozzie the exact same thing could have happened and the incident wouldnt have THEN been about prositutes would it?

    It still would have been a kid insulting an adult who wasnt in the mood for being insulted and battered the crap out of the little tosser irrespective of the race or nationality of either person involved

    #289293

    Did anyone notice if they plan to scrutinise picture messages too??? :shock: :shock: :shock: :oops: :oops:

    #289229

    @emmalush wrote:

    @ubermik wrote:

    As I know many white british people WOULD react in this exact same way then it isnt a racial issue except to racists

    You’re missing the point, my point, being, this incident wouldn’t have happened if we didn’t let people like the white slovakian into the country.

    It happens with other 10 year olds and adults, but this is about these 2.

    What the hell is a racist?

    Thats ISNT a point unlerss as I said earlier you can substantiate the claim that ONLY slovakians, or immigrants WOULD or COULD ever respond to a cheeky brat in this manner

    A point you cant substantiate

    As you cant substantiate that point then it could just as easily have been an elderly white british bloke, an older thug or a white single parent woman who could just as easily not been in the mood for this gobby brats insults and who would have beaten him just as severely

    Your point is ONLY valid IF ONLY immigrants are capable of reacting in such a way to a gobby yob, a point I dont think even you would be idiotic or retarded enough to try and make

    In lieu of that point being made the fact the person who beat him was, or more acurately MIGHT have been an immigrant becomes irrelevant and we are simply left with the scenarip of an adult not being in the mood for the gobby antics of a snot nosed probably out of control child most probably the byproduct of a single parent household

    But to put it bluntly, if NO kids thought they could get away with cheeking adults then NO adults would, as in this case decide to give the little b’stards a pasting

    If you arent prepared for a retaliatory action then dont do anything that will cause one

    Simple really

    The nationality is irrelevant

    #289227

    @sweetass wrote:

    @emmalush wrote:

    @ubermik wrote:

    you claimed you defend “white people”, the woman IS white, slovakians ARE white

    Ok, i’ll pretend you didn’t make a fool of yourself.

    I would defend any white person of any nationality ahead of “english” coco pops, but its a tall enough job sticking up for white English people due to the fascists who rule England.

    Jesus Emma … dont waste your time ffs ..Uber is pc friendly to every nationality but the rightful members of england ffs :twisted: :roll:

    Ahh, I see the arts of selective reading or reading with eyes firmly closed isnt dead then lol

    Are you two clones or something? Clones that the ability to grasp quite simplistic points and the ability to comprehend was accidentally ommitted from?

    Read whats actually written rather than what your simple minded feeble brains WANT to have been written

    IF, and its an important if, you CAN with any sense or validity claim that NO white english person would EVER have reacted to a scumbag little scrote in this way, THEN, and ONLY then does this become anything whatsoever to do with race or immigration

    As I know many white british people WOULD react in this exact same way then it isnt a racial issue except to racists

    Had the kid been polish and the woman british the same small minded eejits would have been slating the kid and defending the white english person who battered the “nasty immigrant”

    A more balanced outlook doesnt yield to the pavlovian wording of the BNP advert and sees the fact

    A “child” that obviously lacks discpipline pissed someone off and got the crap knocked out of them

    Had he NOT done that he wouldnt have had the crap beaten out of him

    This story is actually more of a continuation of the ones on yob culture on a factual basis than it is to do with immigration

    As for calling me PC lol, just how much of a totally retarded drooling idiotic fool ARE you ffs hahahaha

    Bejesus, such a fool

    #289327

    @slayer wrote:

    Ah Sharon but watch when you pay doule or triple for your grocery bill!

    This lil ole county of mine has approx 100,000 migrant summer workers (my village of 358 has 650 eastern Europeans living in big converted warehouses down the lane- n no, we dont have any trouble n the local pub landlord thinks its xmas every day!) but its a chicken n egg question- supply drives demand…or demand drives supply?

    Is it a supermarket buying cheap produce to kepp prices down or is it the consumer who wants cheap prices n will go elsewhere if its not cheap?

    This is a bit too focused

    Cheap labour creates an ever decreasing economy

    An economies bouyancy is controlled by public spending, public spending is driven by ACTUAL cash in peoples pockets rather than credit based spending, cash in peoples pockets is put there when their wages are over and above what they need to live on

    Poorly controlled immigration hits an economy in various ways

    Workers with families in tow take more out of an economic system than they will EVER pay in, so theyre not REALLY “cheap” labour at all as that extra tax has to come from somewhere

    Workers with illnesses take more out of an economic system than they will EVER pay in, so theyre not REALLY “cheap” labour at all as that extra tax has to come from somewhere

    Workers from countries like poland arent consumerised, so vast amounts of the money they earn is sent back home rather than being reinjected into our economy for purchases

    Money not being reinjected into our economy for purchases negatively influences our economic bouyancy. reduces the fluidity and validity of businesses, means less sales staff are needed, less shops are needed and more people are out of work

    More people being out of work means more taxes are needed

    Also there are non influenced products that HAVE to be bought, cheap labour doesnt reduce the cost of electricity, gas, water or petrol

    Cheap polish labour within the transport system hasnt decreased fairs or increased services, its simply increased profits for the companies

    Any “savings” cheap fruit and veg MIGHT resemble, when it also causes a need for more tax to publicly fund that “cheap” labour means that less flexible costs HAVE to go up as a result, taxation HAS to go up and the ancilliary governmental costs associated with collecting that extra cost goes up which invariably takes more income from people than the pennies the cheaper food saves them so systematically people end up worse and worse off

    Thats why although many things now are proportionally cheaper than they were 10 years ago people have far less actual cash left after they have paid their bills each month, so rather than some economical benefit to the populace its an ever descending financial downward spiral and only the companies profits are benefitting positively from it

    Taking a single thing out of a “system” like an economic system and claiming its “good” is like taking a single non cancerous cell out of a patient riddled with cancer and claiming it “proves” they dont have cancer

Viewing 10 posts - 91 through 100 (of 929 total)