Trapper

@sceptical guy wrote:

I’m referring to the people here who puff themselves up like frogs and shout out slogans about fighting without even thinking about what type of fighting.

It is well-known how to defeat ISIS, baecause it’s how al quada were defeatedin Iraq.

British and US troops couldn’t defeat al quaeda. Google the accounts of the Iraq war…

[Read more]

@sceptical guy wrote:

a lot of hot air and gas from Traps and somer, I see.

Anyone with their ehad screwed on – and that even includes the French after being attacked – will not want soldiers on the ground in Syria. Ever stopped your posturings and wondered why???? :?

Ever thought of actually giving some solution ideas ? Would this be the French…[Read more]

For Fucks Sake is probably the one I use most :?

we shall fight on the beaches,
we shall fight on the landing grounds,
we shall fight in the fields and in the streets,
we shall fight in the hills;
we shall never surrender,

So we don’t do boots on the ground and we don’t bomb and isis will cease and desist I’m guessing? btw labour aren’t against just jeremy apparently

@sceptical guy wrote:

a (UKIP-type) snowjob

as a Canadian friend once put it..for the thread, I mean.

Did he explain what he meant (or she) :?

Maybe throw in an eccles cake

theyll pay for the bourbons too

You gotta love rhetoric

or all meet in Dabiq and see what happens

How about a coffee evening when we invite them round for a little chat and serve bourbons

AbitofMary_J

Not very realistic though there’s no air on the moon ffs

I wasn’t discussing anything or apportioning blame didn’t feel it was necessary

And this was not the thread to voice any of that

@sceptical guy wrote:

For all the victims of terror

Roughly translated blame these people not isis