@thenorfolkmafia
active 7 years, 1 month agoForum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Weird yes. You don’t type like someone with a Ph.D In fact not even degree level.
I would like to hear you explain to me why anti-positivism should be considered scientific.
Don’t avoid the question with another question. I am not playing your endless question game. You could have just simply answered to which I would have happily responded. A pretty simple, sincere question. If you want to play it safe that of course is your prerogative. Personally had I been asked, I would have responded.
The problem is you can’t answer a single question asked of you as when challenged you just keep reverting back to your generic phrases again quoting examples of men proposing to women as examples of sexism/ male aggression lol. I don’t think you realise how weak and pathetic your posts are- there’s no substance to any of them, just hot air.
The grown ups, with a real Ph.D, not a JC one, will read the entire thread and make their own minds up based on the entire content and in context. That is all I have got to say to you today.
I think most reading this thread will realise you are someone with a baseless argument lacking logic, coherence and intelligence projecting a view which is motivated by other factors than you claim. You have been unable to answer a single question put to you , revert back to default mode setting of generic rhetoric regurgitated like a 3rd world lavatory containing phrases you don’t fully understand in an effort to appear far more intelligent than you actually are.
The longer the thread goes on, the clearer it is you are someone utterly out of their depth on every level clutching at more straws than a horny scarecrow to validate your pitifully weak arguments in a desperate attempt to portray yourself as someone who hasn’t been completely obliterated once again.
Weird yes. You don’t type like someone with a Ph.D In fact not even degree level.
I would like to hear you explain to me why anti-positivism should be considered scientific.
Don’t avoid the question with another question. I am not playing your endless question game. You could have just simply answered to which I would have happily responded. A pretty simple, sincere question. If you want to play it safe that of course is your prerogative. Personally had I been asked, I would have responded.
The problem is you can’t answer a single question asked of you as when challenged you just keep reverting back to your generic phrases again quoting examples of men proposing to women as examples of sexism/ male aggression lol. I don’t think you realise how weak and pathetic your posts are- there’s no substance to any of them, just hot air.
I’m not surprised Ge harrasses women online , the ones that play the white knight coming to the rescue in the sickly way he does on every thread to try to win brownie points are normally the ones guilty of doing what they claim to despise themselves. As we can see from his pm to suz43, he’s clearly a sickly sex pest only interested in cam antics pretending to be some sort of champion for feminism whilst out of his depth on every topic intellectually he has ever discussed. To summarise, a low IQ ,depraved moron that is disingenuous in his real reason for arguing topics like this driven by the insatiable desire to satisfy his tiny overactive ballbag bubbling over in frustration at having no one who wishes to empty it whilst he sits cock in hand on his cam … case closed.
Lol. I had no idea you are such an expert on sociology Drac, I am impressed. Being scientific yourself though, because according to you sociology isn’t science and reiterating that science only counts, surely you must have some ideas yourself relating to this issue? Do you think sexism exists in society or not and if you don’t think sexism exists, why not? A genuine question.
I’ll tell you what does exist, some snivelling sex pest in yourself that crawls to women on here attempting to cam them and then rejected reverts to the very thing you accuse others of ” aggression and sexism”.
The simple fact of the matter is, you aren’t intelligent enough to argue your points , fall back on “sexism, aggression to women” and then perpetuate the very act you are apparently so gallantly accusing others of. What a creepy little weirdo you are.
Ge is clearly just trolling the thread full of nonsense unable to discuss the actual topic as usual posting links to a man proposing to a woman attempting to use it to vindicate his sexism argument.
Rudeboy logic, I provide evidence that woman and men are treated differently by advertisers and commentators and so his logic about viewing figures is therefore flawed and inaccurate and here is Rudeboys stock escape route. You carry on, shouting at anyone who has the audacity to challenge your aggressive, sexist, prehistoric views. You just can’t have a conversation without resorting to personal abuse. Bless.
You have been asked to provide evidence of sports not involving animals or machines where women can compete with men.. you have come up with equestrian and ice dancing
You have been asked to vindicate the three set/ five set discrepancy in tennis when women are capable of running marathons .. you have come up with nothing
You have been asked why explaining how natural biological differences between the genders meaning men outperform women constantly in sports amounts to sexism… your response is using a man proposing to a woman as evidence of ” male dominance and rife sexism”.
You are now saying viewing figures are flawed down to sexism when 3 times the number of people watch male tennis compared to female tennis. Allow me to educate you
I suppose anyone saying male footballers are more watched than female footballers are sexist as well and in reality there are 76 000 watching the female game similar to old trafford on a saturday afternoon. What will you post next ..an example of a man holding a door open for a woman as evidence of sexism and male dominance ? You are out of your depth as always continually embarrassing yourself. I don;t agree with Nemesis but at least there is some logic in her points whilst yours appear to be laden with written cowpats of nonsense.
Ge is clearly just trolling the thread full of nonsense unable to discuss the actual topic as usual posting links to a man proposing to a woman attempting to use it to vindicate his sexism argument.
Accusations of sexism have cropped up repeatedly in this year’s Olympic games, almost as garish and ubiquitous a feature as the medals themselves. We’ve seen participants ridiculed for having the audacity to have the muscles required to be world class athletes, criticised for wearing too much clothing in a hijab or not enough in a bikini, as well as spark controversy for mentioning how menstruation affects their performance. Most recently, an athlete’s boyfriend’s decision to propose to her when she was fresh off the winners’ podium sparked think pieces around the world as spectators flocked to ponder whether this was a romantic gesture or a sexist sign of male dominance. http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/olympics/rio-2016-the-charts-which-show-how-sexism-affects-how-we-talk-about-female-and-female-athletes-a7197516.html
You’re boring the sweet jesus out of everyone on the forum… do you not realise how silly you look every post repeating the same lines. Try a post without the word sexism- see if you can actually do it as you clearly don’t grasp what the word means. The fact you are using an example of a man proposing to a woman as an example of “sexism” when discussing pay at wimbledon illustrates how weak and utterly pointless your arguments are.
Incidentally far higher numbers watch mens tennis than womens tennis so again there is absolutely no criteria they should be paid equal amounts. If we accept you are paid on a sliding scale of ability / viewing demand then it’s case closed
Sport is a context of physical ability and skill, that is inherantly masquline.
Except all the Olympic level (elite) sport that isn’t, like gymnastics, equestrian, ice dance etc.
You’ve already been told in gymnastics that men can do routines women can’t yet still keep using it as an example. Equestrian involves sitting on a horse ffs and ice dance ! Jesus wept … how many men take up “ice dancing” as a vocation? It’s like using the snooker analogy, you are comparing apples and oranges where there are not equal numbers competing yet you appear too thick to see it.
I will give my opinion, when I like, whether you like it or not, whatever ID you are in today. For obvious reasons, your participation in particular, the debate can’t evolve and question the prevailing sexism in sport which leads to an unequal playing field, when it comes to both genders. Which then leads to unequal funding and prize money.
What leads to an unequal playing field you blithering idiot are the fundamental differences between men and women on a biological level. Name a sport where they are equal in performance.. you can’t and just dance round the houses like the hysterical drama queen you are. If someone told you female boxers would lose to men in the most blatant eg of this you would start screaming sexism again like the whining screeching kettle of diarrhea you seem to be. You keep saying there are sports that dont involve this , so far you have come up with sitting on a horse which does all the work and ice dancing where hardly any men compete at all.
Except all the Olympic level (elite) sport that isn’t, like gymnastics, equestrian, ice dance etc.
Gymnastics definitely requires an abnormal level of physical ability and skill, as does ice dancing. I wouldn’t really call them sports though, as the winner is determine by a process that is too subjective for my liking. Equestrian events are a strange case, as the horse is effectively the one being scored on performance, not the human
I agree but Ge is incapable of understanding a single point on the thread and just starts with his sexism mantra of gibberish again.. there’s no substance to anything he writes , it looks like it has been written by the student union.
