Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@tom wrote:
http://www.icj-cij.org/homepage/index.php
http://ec.europa.eu/euro/index_en.html
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/cover121406.htm
http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTABOUTUS/0,,contentMDK:20040558~menuPK:34559~pagePK:34542~piPK:36600,00.html
Wow look at that, all those non-existent organisations having paid officials, presidents and even official websites.
What’s your point? Anyone can set up a website claiming this, that or the other. Go back, do your research, Junior.
@tom wrote:
As I said, a childishly naive peasant dangling from strings.
Oh how I love the fresh smell of paranoia… ;)
@tom wrote:
I shan’t reply to you any further – it really is no fun talking to an empty vessel.
Bye! Don’t let the door hit you on the way out. :lol: :lol:
@tom wrote:
Anybody here who does still have a free mind?
@cherriepie wrote:
I Love conspiracy theories, I do not believe this makes me “delusional” or “stupid” at all.
:?
Loving them is one thing. Believing them is something else entirely. :shock:
An echo?
@tom wrote:
Either another mindless sheep brainwashed into believing what the political elite tell him to believe, or just a troll not worth bothering with.
Anybody who says the “new world order” doesn’t exist are clearly delusional and incredibly and childishly naive. The EU, Euro, World Bank, World Court, EU court, EU president, EU army, the up-and-coming Amero and the NAU, international financial “democracy” and the political elite’s push for globalisation and less libertarianism etc would dispute otherwise, as there is clearly a move towards unified international governments, gradually fusing into one over time.
No doubt the troll (and/or childishly naive puppet) will post “huh? There’s no such thing as the EU, globalisation, increased state control or a world financial bank!”
And where’s the proof? No? OK then, back to your delusions. :)
@twistinmymelonman wrote:
Nobody can travel through the van allen belt
Have to look at this again, I think your melons have been overtwisted. ;)
>>How dangerous is the Van Allen Belt?<<
The van Allen belt is a region of energetic charged particles trapped by Earth’s magnetic field. Partcile radiation is best shielded by light metals, plastic, and water, all abundant in the Apollo spacecraft. Additionally, they were sent out on a trajectory that avoided the most dangerous areas of the belts and carried them through the unavoidable regions in less than two hours, not long enough to receive anything close to a dangerous radiation does in that environment. Dr James van Allen himself specifically denies that they pose any barrier to manned space flight.
>>if there was no danger from the Van Allen Belt then how come we didn’t go back to the moon,<<
We went to the Moon (and therefore through the belts) nine times, but then NASA ran out of money and was directed to work on other things. NASa is funded by the taxpayer, and once the Moon was reached they lost interest in having their tax dollars spent on sending men there again.
>>how come we have a space station in orbit and not on the moon.<<
Because Earth orbit is still the safest place to be. The van Ellen belts protect from big solar flares. If you put a station on the Moon for years you have to provide some serious radiation protection, because really big solar flares can kill astronauts very quickly. During the Apollo program NASA launched at times when the chance of a major flare happening during the two-week flight was low, and had emergency measures in place should one occur. It was a risk, but a calculated one.
>>how come they told us that the space-suits were made to withstand the radiation and they’re not.<<
They are, but only the radiation encountered in space for the duration of the mission. Where radiation is concerned time is a key factor.
God you lot are less of a challenge than I’d hoped…
@twistinmymelonman wrote:
I won’t waste my time any further, you refuse to accept reality. Nobody can travel through the van allen belt, the pictures are already proven to be fake by experts, and the astronauts are filming themselves faking the footage, and all you have to say is tosh :lol: . Good night Master Delusional.
Haha. So you never watched the videos then. Fine, now I know who I’m dealing with.
Like I said, please tell me WHY the Soviets haven’t called the whole thing a fake when it would have been very much in their best interests to do so?
You can’t. I win.
Back in your box now. :)
And I dare you to go on this website and make your claims.
OK, who’s next? :twisted:
@twistinmymelonman wrote:
Do share your views once you have watched the following in FULL. It would save me typing just a few of many points of the first 1 on your list.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6MvcIs4OcQ&
Done. What tosh.
Now, your turn. Watch THESE (in full!) and it’ll save me the trouble of debunking each and every one of your ‘points’. :)
And as for your videos, I’m hoping for something more testing, next time. :)
Besides all that, the race for the Moon was a fierce, fierce battle between the US and the Soviet Union. If the Soviets thought for a SECOND that the moon landing was faked, don’t you think they’d have been the first to raise concerns?
Common sense, all I’m saying.
@twistinmymelonman wrote:
Nobody needs to prove anything to you!
Even though I’ve asked for it? Fair enough, but all it appears is that you CAN’T prove it.
@twistinmymelonman wrote:
You’re free to believe any story you want to, that’s the beauty. If you choose to believe what you’re told, and happy with it, good luck to you.
I choose to believe irrefutable proof over anecdotal evidence. Yes. Best of luck to you too.
