@forumhostpb wrote:
Well I was referring to the High Court judgement this week that allowed a divorced wife to claim a substantial share in her husband’s assets even though she had not contributed directly to their acquisition. The fact that she had given up a potential carreer to be married entitled her to a big payout from his assets, even though only being married a relatively short period of time.
It is said that pre-nuptial agreements could get round this by setting out a ”fair share” of the assets before the marriage took place – even though these agreements are not directly recognised in English matrimonial law.
So it seemed to me that Witey and Gizmo ought to consider a ‘pre nup’ before they get married so that when they get divorced shortly afterwards, they won’t fight over the assets.
who ever said that true love never dies obviously hadn’t met PB …… :wink: