Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
4 April, 2005 at 10:24 pm #106467
On a closing note, you can set the paging file as high as 1152mb on a system with 256mb (not recommended) but the paging file should be instaled on a seperate partition on your HDD and kept seperate from your program files, this will enable your comp to read the paging file much quicker, but you will still suffer from high HDD usage when using the paging file, so dont be surprised when your HDD gives up the ghost.
It is very good practice to leave the paging file at its recommended size.
256mb = 376mb
512mb = 760mb
1024 = 1536mb4 April, 2005 at 9:04 pm #106466@morticia wrote:
I didn’t play around with anything honest guv !!! I’m a firm believer of “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” unless “you know someone who can make it better !”
I had a brief look at the paging size today [but was reaaallly busy :roll: ] and it was still around 390’ish so I assume it only increased it slightly ???
Like I said, I had a couple of applications open and my Excel spreadsheet had a lot of photo’s and images in it which I was editing and then I sent the files to my colour printer – this is when it started slowing down and came up with the error.
I did speak to one of the IT guys but the man doesn’t even string a sentence together and I asked him it was okay that XP did this and he just grumbled and walked off………….. :roll: So I took that as a yes ??
Thanks for you input SuperA [as ever ! :wink: ]
Morty 390 mb paging file is fine im just trying to say setting it to 650 or 512 is a killer on your HDD. It seems to of made the paging file 20+ mb bigger but this is ok. If you get paging errors every time you start your computer up this is when alarm bells should be ringing.
4 April, 2005 at 9:00 pm #106464Sorry Morty ignore the post above. I thought you said your paging file was only 1mb.
The reason your paging file was increased in volume was because all those applications running are too much for a comp with 256 mb of RAM to handle so the paging file increased its volume to handle these applications and to stop itself from crashing.
If it ran slow Morty, try rebooting and dont run so many applications at once.
4 April, 2005 at 8:40 pm #106462@morticia wrote:
Sorry to butt in…………………as this is on topic…………
My PC at work today [Windows XP, 256MB Ram :roll: sheesh !]…..anyhoo, was busy [as normal] and my RAM dropped down to 1MB . Windows then came up with a warning and said it had changed my paging file size.
errr not being that techie [give me a question on Excel or Word or PSP and I can answer !] I’m assuming this is okay ??? It kinda ran like cr@p for the rest of the day but again, it may have been a network problem………..
Now that is strange Morty, considering the paging file has a minimum size of 2mb for a system with 256 mb instaled but you had only a 1mb paging file???? up the paging file to the recommended size for your system. If you have 256 mb times this by 1.5 and make this your paging file size it should be 376 mb or there roundabouts.
Morty have you been playing around with your RAM settings? If you have’nt something has set your paging file to a diffrent size. Your comp will adjust the volume of the paging file but will not decrease its volume, unless you do it manually (although i may be wrong im 95% sure im correct). I’d definatley want to know what set the paging file to a smaller size.
4 April, 2005 at 8:25 pm #106460@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
@superanubistype wrote:
@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
Hi Ellen,
try this…
>Start
>Control Panel
>System
>Advanced
Under ‘Performance’
> Settings
Here in ‘Visual Settings’ you can adjust the performance of your pc.
I have mine set to ‘Adjust for best performance’ but you might prefer to
use ‘Let Windows choose what’s best for my computer’.
If you Click ‘Advanced’ you can change your Virtual Memory settings.
It should tell you the minimum size and the recommended size for your
paging file.
The minimum size for my system is 2MB
The recommended size is 382MB
I have it set to 512MB
I hope this helps. :wink:LMAO a 512mb paging file??? wtf?
I think this is seriously bad advise as your just hiding the problem and causing massive HDD usage :? (This is why Microsoft recommend a 382mb paging file). And while your adjudsting the perforamance settings of Ellens XP, why did’nt you tell Ellen to instal Windows 98, you might just of well of done.
Ellen if your running 256mb of RAM, sure the comps going to be slow but you should’nt be getting paging file errors. I can’t tell you the reasons your getting VM errors but there is something that’s using alot of RAM on your comp and it definatley needs investigating. I’m sure there’s many users on here that use 256mb with XP and have no VM probs.
Until we know the size of Ellens’ paging file BEFORE she adjusted it,
you’re talking out your ass! :roll:Owen i take it as you did’nt know that XP makes the default setting of the paging file is 1 and 1/2 times the physical RAM installed on the comp and this would make the default paging file exactly 376 mb on Ellens machine with 256mb of physical RAM instaled.
If you dont believe me Google it like you normally do.
So now Ellen has a combined RAM of 906 mb, 256 mb of physical RAM, and a 650 mb of (VM) and heavy usage of HDD not to mention changing the settings and performance to Windows 98, and the problems still there LMAO.
Thanks Owen for proving you really dont know a thing.
Ellen there is something causing this RAM drainage and you need to investigate the possibility of spyware, trojans, viruses and malware. Something on your system is fúcking with your RAM, and it’s not Bullguard.
3 April, 2005 at 3:17 pm #107403@soulie wrote:
optical one.. microsoft.. i read through the links.. and the problem seems to be with this type of mouse.. as soon i can afford it.. i’ll treat myself to a new mouse :)
Well if there’s no navigation ball to clean Soulie, it means the mouse has had it.
3 April, 2005 at 2:56 pm #107401@soulie wrote:
my mouse has no balls :(
LMAO a mouse with no balls? What sought of mouse you got Soulie?
3 April, 2005 at 2:28 pm #107399I had this prob were the mouse strangley moves itself.
Soulie, have got clicklock on? If so turn it off.
Turn your mouse over undo the fastner that holds the navigation ball in place and make sure theres no debris or crap in there if it’s clean go out and buy a new mouse, cause that one’s had it.
3 April, 2005 at 2:16 pm #106457@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
Hi Ellen,
try this…
>Start
>Control Panel
>System
>Advanced
Under ‘Performance’
> Settings
Here in ‘Visual Settings’ you can adjust the performance of your pc.
I have mine set to ‘Adjust for best performance’ but you might prefer to
use ‘Let Windows choose what’s best for my computer’.
If you Click ‘Advanced’ you can change your Virtual Memory settings.
It should tell you the minimum size and the recommended size for your
paging file.
The minimum size for my system is 2MB
The recommended size is 382MB
I have it set to 512MB
I hope this helps. :wink:LMAO a 512mb paging file??? wtf?
I think this is seriously bad advise as your just hiding the problem and causing massive HDD usage :? (This is why Microsoft recommend a 382mb paging file). And while your adjudsting the perforamance settings of Ellens XP, why did’nt you tell Ellen to instal Windows 98, you might just of well of done.
Ellen if your running 256mb of RAM, sure the comps going to be slow but you should’nt be getting paging file errors. I can’t tell you the reasons your getting VM errors but there is something that’s using alot of RAM on your comp and it definatley needs investigating. I’m sure there’s many users on here that use 256mb with XP and have no VM probs.
29 March, 2005 at 7:21 pm #106427@forumhostpb wrote:
Cheers for that Dave – I will let Anubis do the honours with Lucky (if there are any to be done that is) as he is far more technically proficient than I am. Anyway my wife may well want to delete my Operating System if I went ‘surfing’.
As for your ME issue. As ME does not require registration as such you could borrow a copy of Windows ME from a friend and instal it from that.
However there is a better option if you want. As you have a previous version of Windows already on your PC – you can buy an upgrade disc to upgrade it to Windows XP (Home or Pro) quite a bit cheaper than having to buy a full retail version. The upgrade version will look for a previous Windows Operating System and then, once found, it will completely re-format your hard disk and install a full version of XP (Home or Pro – whichever one you have bought)
Quite frankly this would be a really sensible interim step before buying a new PC, as Windows ME is generally sneered at and with good cause.
Lmao PB, are you feeling lucky?
Dave if you just reinstaled Nero i find it very strange that your missing dll’s relevant to the Nero program. When you get the missing dll error message again, copy the dll that your system is saying your missing and go here http://www.dll-files.com and put the dll’s name in the search box at the top left hand corner of the page. If if has the dll your missing download it and instal it to the relevant folder. If this site dont host the dll’s your missing try googling the name of the dll’s.
Dave did you reinstal IE? and if you did, did you use the registry cleaner before you reinstaled IE6? And is the Minibug still there? it may be worth checking because if you uninstaled IE then cleansed the registry with tune up, it may, if your very lucky to of got rid of the Minibug if it was IE6 related.
-
AuthorPosts