Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Why does everyone in this thread support rape except me?
HANG THEM. Ffs. They’re RAPISTS. They harm women! Just hang them.
You gang of evil twits supporting the rape of young girls. You should be ashamed of yourselves, every last one of you who has posted on this thread.
@pete wrote:
Thats cause he’s a raving nonce Dolly
I love how people resort to libel when they’ve lost an argument. :lol:
May I just say.. that.. if I had kids.. I would NOT allow Glitter to babysit them, no.
Because there’s so much controversy flying around, there’s always that doubt in the back of your mind.
BUT, I’m only looking at facts here.
Where was his pictures found? PC World. That’s contaminated evidence right there. DOWNLOADED pictures were found in a… COMPUTER shop. Hmmm?? They couldn’t have been planted, could they? ;) course they could.
Second evidence.. a picture of him hugging a 10 year old in Vietnam. The picture was taken by a member of.. THE BRITISH PRESS. Yet again, contaminated evidence. It could easily have been a setup, another money-making opportunity for the press.
I only deal with facts, and the fact is, there is NO hard evidence that Glitter is guilty. No, I wouldn’t trust him with my kids, but yes, I’m a fan of his, the majority of my conscience beliees he’s innocent and I would gladly buy him a pint.
@minim wrote:
Smiley…… you of all people should know better. I seem to remember your entrapment disguises in JC. You would deliberately try and trap paedophiles in Forum 1. Now then…. I suspect you are being deliberately inflammatory, but enough is enough.
Gary Glitter is a convicted paedophile. He will always be a convicted paedophile. Anyone who allows him access to their children in the future on the premise that he was “set up” has to be missing a large amount of brain cells and common sense.
But he’s innocent. He was deliberately framed.
Those people in F1 were clearly guilty! I saw they were guilty with my own eyes.
I’ve never seen Glitter bumming a child, thus, innocent.
Gay as ever thank you 8) :lol:
Awwwwwwwwwwwwww :oops: I’m touched :oops: I find you impersonating me very flattering :oops: going into one of the chat rooms as me.. awwwwww :oops: imitation is the highest form of flattery my friend, you only feed my ego by telling such lies ;)
..And believe me my ego is big enough as it is !! Stop massaging it !! :lol:
It means you’re too young. It’s a new JC system that scans you via your monitor screen to see how old you are, if you’re an immature teenager (such as.. someone who makes things up because they’ve lost a debate).. you get locked out for being a young ‘en.
Below your age group, my man. Below your age group.
Just because you can’t prove he’s guilty is no reason to make things up – that’s not very British now is it?
@reason wrote:
@smiley wrote:
I believe he is, because it is proven fact that the pictures on his hard drive were placed there by a staff member in PC World, so he could cash in on the newspaper story.
There has never been proof of him molesting children, and he has always denied molesting children. Gary Glitter is NOT a liar, so if he says he hasn’t, then he hasn’t.
Gary Glitter IS innocent, and has been WRONGLY persecuted, prosecuted, harassed and oppressed. He’s aged before his time because of all the stress, and it’s wrong. He should be compensated.
So this wasn’t good enough for you to get your rocks off,you foookin sad little perverted individual,you had to take it into an open chatroom to get the turn on that you needed,i knew you were low but to go into forum three and try to defend bastad Glitter….well there really is no hope for you.Foookin evil warped tvvat.
Remember ….. i don’t foookin care
? Why are you making things up? I don’t go into these chat rooms you dopey sod.
No need for you to make things up. That’s a bit silly really, isn’t it? A bit below your age-range, eh? Grow up.
BUT.. he IS innocent.
Gary Glitter has NEVER harmed a child in his life. He said so himself in his auto-biography. HE’S INNOCENT.
