Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Hope you have a great day.
Happy birthday.
@lucylocket wrote:
@kent f OBE wrote:
Would you have sex with someone for £1,000,000 if no one would find out?
It would mean spending at least 6 hours with that person, so blokes…no wham bam thank you maa’m :wink: ( btw I have apostrophe-itus…so paranoid I don’t know where to put it!).
(no judging guys it’s only a make believe dilemma)
too fookin right i wud! YOLO :lol:YOLO indeed.
I’ll take you up on that and I’ll pay on the never never. how does a pound a week sound?
@tinks wrote:
my favourite line from my favourite film
……..”I am Mrs De Winter now!”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cf0-GsXDzI
1:11:00
:D/
go girl!!! woop woopGood film!
Not a big fan of gone with the wind, though. Anyway, i’ll see your David Selznick film and raise you with:
Very blokey and predictable this one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOphFl88U-g
From one of my favourite films of all time:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X20XIg38GcE
Spike Lee’s homage to the Night of the Hunter:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zgzp83dL1E
Not a speech but it’s one of my favourite moments from any film
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10_ej-CBNOM
I’m just transfixed by how Denis Lavant moves.
The more keen-eyed amongst you will remember him from the Stella Artois advert and UNKLE’s Rabbit in the headlights videoFrom Pelle the Conqueror
Pelle: Father?
Lassefar: Everything’s gonna be fine.
Pelle: Tell it again.
Lassefar: This new country we’re going to is very different.
Pelle: Talk more about it.
Lassefar: They put raisins in the pork roast and butter on the bread. They put a lot of butter on the bread. Brandy is cheap as water and it is so strong that it knocks you off. But your father can take it, Pelle, because he’s strong.
Pelle: And children are free all day.
Lassefar: Yes, Pelle, yes.
Pelle: Tell it again.
Lassefar: You get so well paid that children don’t need…
Pelle: Don’t need to work. They can play all day long.
Lassefar: [smiling] Yes.@rogue trader wrote:
rusty me old mate,i love you,we even share the same initials R.T
even tho we both know each other by different names over the road
but the rules are,you have to get the first question right
before you start another
its a bit like i.spy lol
however you wasnt to know
so i will try to answer your questions tomorrow
as i have to be in wigan by half six.Apologies old chap.
Just delete the questions.
Confused by the other name thing.
Love this thread!
Here are a few more questions. Some fairly easy (I think), some not so. You might have to consult Google University for a few of the answers but hey ho…
1. The only film directed by a man famous for playing a famous hunchback.
2. Who played the following roles: a priest in The Exorcist, a man duelling with death, the father of a famous victim of WWII and the the director of PreCrime.
3. Which Olympic medal winner appeared in a James Bond film?
What/who links the
4. Which film was Charlie Chaplin’s first talkie?
5. The following musicians have songs famously associated with films. Name the song and the film: Psychedelic Furs, The Righteous Brothers and Curtis Mayfield
Who/what links the following
6. Michael Jackson, Eddie Murphy and Jenny Agutter
7. Mel Gibson and Lee Marvin
8. Terry Gilliam and Josef Goebbels
9. Andrew Stanton, Ron Underwood and Breck Eisner
10. Ralph Macchio and Jaden Smith
11. Edward Woodward and Mel Gibson@sceptical guy wrote:
@terry wrote:
Having been on the receiving end of several of your limp-wristed insults…
I see the UKIP candidate for Rotherham has denounced gay foster-parenting.
They do seem to have an obsession, don’t they?
I think that whether the foster-parents are UKIP members, BNP members, Communists, or gay should have nothing to do with the issue. It should be whether theya re caring parents.
In Principle, it’s easy to agree with you, but it is possible to be a caring foster parent and hold views which although perfectly legal, despite how others feel about them, may be detrimental to the welfare of the children. For example, if potential foster-parents believed sexuality is primarily a lifestyle choice rather than something innate and that ‘errant’ sexuality can be medicated and therapeutically treated, my opinion is that it would be ill-advised to place certain children of a very specific nature under their care.
People are entitled to maintain the beliefs they choose, despite how reprehensible I or other people may find them. It’s when they impinge on the lives of others that it becomes a public issue. I think we are fortunate to live in a society were it is deemed unacceptable to maintain sexist, racist, homophobic and other similar views, but we can’t prevent such thinking being prevalent with some people. However, we can seek to prevent such views causing harm by using legislation and social influence.
I think this is was the intention of Rotherham Council although they may have been misguided. I don’t think there is sufficient information about how they made their decision to hold a properly informed opinion about this. It seems like this information will be withheld anyway.
@terry wrote:
@rusty trawler wrote:
intelligence is a social construct and it requires the ability to take on board ideas and concepts that you might not necessarily agree with and to put them under some sort of rational analysis.
Concepts that I “might not necessarily agree with” always come after my “rational analysis” of them. What you need to try is a bit of research and establish your own view of the EU and its benefits (if any exist).
Reread my previous posts, take a look at your replies. Then let me know if that rings true.
Don’t bother, I can take a decent stab at guessing your reply.
@sceptical guy wrote:
forging a Christmas card to Kenty from Terry
Shouldn’t that be ‘farraging’?
@wordsworth60 wrote:
@rusty trawler wrote:
. . . . . . I don’t think you’re capable of taking on board the opinions of anyone else unless they align with yours and I don’t care to engage with someone who thinks they have all the answers.
Don’t want to spoil his game rusty, but it’s obvious that Terry’s just enjoying winding people up. Trouble is, his ‘House’ icon identifies him with a clever character with a sense of irony, but great difficulty conveying a sense of his own fallibility.
Best play with him and pretend to be wound up or openly ridicule him – he’s better than a a ball on a string on a good day.
Thanks for the advice Words. I’ll give it some thought over a quick drink at the gentleman’s establishment as it seems to have been abandoned of late.
