I sail on no ones boat, unlike you obviously crawling round the women with your views on this thread trying to gain favour – bit sickly to say the least. So because I have had a disagreement with Norfolk in the past I should disagree with everything he says? That’s a bit pathetic to say the least. Pick up on one point on this thread that I have made where you can prove me wrong.
Lol. So your logic is my views of female tennis and sport it general is because I am “crawling around women”. You just don’t get it do you, not all men share your prehistoric views. I don’t need to disprove anything. You have already openly stated that in mixed doubles women are the weakest link and alluded they are therefore carried by men. Quite frankly blatant sexism. You clearly do not understand the nuances of mixed doubles. You clearly view sport and judge it in exactly the same way as your sidekick. It really is as simple as that. In my opinion, which of course carries no more weight than yours or anyone elses.
lol you know me so well – not. I happen to know people from here personally who I’m sure would tell you how totally pathetic your statement about me being sexist is, oh but no doubt you have more reliable evidence.
As for the mixed doubles, the commentators even pick up on the women being targeted in it, but of course you know better don’t you , know all, with your nuances.
When it suits you, you ask people for reliable evidence, where is your reliable evidence on the sports you have mentioned?
When it suits you, you stick your oar in. Depending on what ship you happen to be traveling on that week. Which changes like the weather. Where is your evidence to back up your claims, you haven’t got any have you. Another one who makes vague claims based solely on gender and not on any verifiable evidence.
I sail on no ones boat, unlike you obviously crawling round the women with your views on this thread trying to gain favour – bit sickly to say the least.
So because I have had a disagreement with Norfolk in the past I should disagree with everything he says? That’s a bit pathetic to say the least.
Pick up on one point on this thread that I have made where you can prove me wrong.
Name a sport which can be measured in quantifiable measurements such as time/distance/postions where women beat men instead of vague references to my statements being inaccurate.
Snooker, pool, and darts are sports that I would expect women would be able to play equally as well as men, but they are things that women don’t seem to have much interest in playing so it would be hard to find numbers for this.
Norfolk stated men are superior than women in ALL sports. Then moved the goal posts as to what that sport actually entailed. Gymnastics, shooting, equestrian, ice skating no doubt more and all Olympic sports where men are NOT superior at all.
When it suits you, you ask people for reliable evidence, where is your reliable evidence on the sports you have mentioned?
I can think of quite a few “non testosterone” sports where women wouldn’t get into the top 100, probably nowhere near that. Snooker being one, where too much testosterone would be a hindrance rather than a benefit.
Tbh I don’t think there’s any doubting that men are superior in any sport I can think of, but as with most things and as it should be, it’s all about supply and demand. It’s quite a few years ago now but I’m almost certain that in the US the viewing figures for Womens tennis overtook the Mens, that is when the Women fought for equal prize money.
You can’t only go on time taken to play a game to work out prize money because the hours spent on court etc. pale into insignificance when you take into account time spent training. If time spent “performing” was what they were paid for then Usain Bolt would be the lowest paid sports star in the world instead of the highest paid.
Watch the mixed double tennis if you want to see who the superior players are, the players on both teams try to target the opposing female every chance they get – think that says it all.
Never had a ceiling fall on my head but was once in a kitchen in a bungalow and the divvy who was working in the loft fell through the ceiling, lucky foooka managed to land on his feet.