MSJC85

As far as i’m aware, this is specific to Pakistan.

Not muslims in general.

Based on the findings of this report.

I think it assumes a no-deal Brexit in it’s analysis, but I dont remember exactly.

International law does not apply in real life, there are no consequences for breaking them.

The UK is arguable the second most powerful country in the world, and has a permanent seat on the UN security council. Nobody will question this decision, it has been made hundreds of times before by the UK.

Islam

UK law does not require that someone holds dual nationality to be denaturalised.

This is a UN directive, which the British government seems to have decided that it doesn’t care about.

I don’t like that denaturalisation is an executive power of the Home Secretary, this was a change that Blair made. However, Savid Javid’s decision is legal,…[Read more]

I found the cause

Joining a terrorist organisation is treason

A majority of the population of Manchester would call you a racist islamophic biggot if you even suggested a possibility that she should not be allowed back into the country, given a council flat and child benifits.

Insulting me doesn’t convince me that you’re right

Nope

This is actually wrong.

The Monty Hall problem needs 4 or more choices before the probability of winning increases from switching. With three choices the probability is 1/3 in both cases.

I feel like we’ve discussed this before.

So … you don’t like any part of the EU?

What is your favourite part of the EU?

I’m not Farage.

The proposals for the “people’s vote” that I have seen use Single Transferable Voting (STV), which would mean that the leave vote would not be split in this way.

Athough, I think that holding another referendum on this subject is a terrible idea regardless of what voting method is used, and what options are on it.

I think that holding a second referendum is a terrible idea.

That seems to be what JC users want, so far.