Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@tommy wrote:
Mr Bigstuff etc preaches democracy – Yet his very same kind are proud to announce they condone violent acts against anybody with a differing opinion to them, especially if those people are white.
They throw around the label ‘nazi’ – Yet they’re the ones who act like violent nazi yobs or support nazi-like behaviour.
Democracy is rule by the people. English civil war saw the foundation of our modern parliamentary democracy. French Revolution got rid of a king and created a republic (republic = res publica = the people’s thing). Cuban Revolution got rid of a fascist dictatorship and empowered the Cuban people through access to healthcare, education, land ownership, etc. So political violence can sometimes be justified. SWAPO, MK, Sandinistas, they all had a legitimate reason to use violence.
Probably too sensible a reply to a p1ss-taking comment.
@emmalush wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
Indeed Emma it shouldn’t matter. However, what interested me was your use of the adjective ”animal” when describing the Asians.
If it had been the other way round, would you have reported it as …… ” Both victims were Asian, were both animal perpetrators white ?.”
I didnt describe any asians as being animal perpetrators. I was asking if they were, for the horrific crimes that were caused, and why the media silence.
The media dont report all crimes. These incidences are becoming more and more common. There is a growing history of asian male on white girl racist criminality in these specific areas of England.
There are alot of asian muslims raping and/or luring young white girls into prostitution in the west yokshire and lancashire areas.
http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/46By alerting the great unwashed to these crimes, highlights the demand to curtail the problem, but like with all things, new labour dont like defending white innocence against asian people, because they need votes to rule YOU.
That sounds a lot like inciting racial hatred to me. I know it’s common practice for the BNP to take a story and exaggerate/omit certain details to serve their agenda but you’re skating on thin ice this time. You’re saying that A LOT of asian muslims are raping young white girls and luring them into prostitution, you’re also implying that asian people are a danger to white people. You can’t say things like that unless they are actually true which they obviously aren’t. You’ll end up with your idols Griffin and Collett if you carry on saying stuff like that.
Well illegal acts of violence are sometimes a necessary evil e.g. the storming of the Bastille, the Cuban Revolution, the English civil war etc.
I couldn’t understand her first post. Apparently dogs are capable of murder now. I was also confused by the Asian “animal perpetrators” remark. Did the rottweillers adopt pakistani nationality or something. How anyone could leave a small baby with guard dogs though is baffling. I think it’s unfair that the dogs had to be put down though because they were only following their natural instincts. As usual, it was the humans who were at fault but the dogs had to pay with their lives.
Emma, you keep asking why the Stephen Lawrence case got so much coverage compared to some other murders, completely overlooking the fact that it was an unprovoked racist murder for which nobody was ever convicted. On top of that there were serious flaws with the police investigation and even an element of corruption with a bent copper. There have been other racist murders that received a lot less media coverage but that’s because the circumstances were different.
What are you talking aboot? You got a problem with Canada, eh?
I wasn’t saying that rioting was the right thing to do in Brixton, I was merely pointing out that the riots were all linked to the activities of the police there. Also the riots in Brixton and Broadwater farm were not exclusively carried out by people of one race and not directed at any other race. However, the rioting of the Countryside Alliance was an exclusively white thing but we wouldn’t call it a race-riot.
I took part in the march on the BNP HQ in Welling years ago. The police had to protect the place so they stopped the marchers getting near the BNP building. Some of us marched off up the hill but some were determined to stand their ground and so there was a stand-off with the riot police. Then I think anarchists within the crowd started hurling missiles which inevitably led to all hell breaking loose. From the hill it looked like a scene from a mediaeval battle with a sea of people laying into each other. There was only ever going to be one winner though and eventually people started coming up the hill covered in blood. So the BNP HQ stayed intact and, when we all left, the BNP supporters were able to come out of hiding (none of them showed their faces when we were around, they were probably crapping themselves).
Of course there was at least one great riot in British history, The Battle Of Cable Street where Oswald Moseley and his BUF (predecessors of the BNP) pals got their arses kicked.
If people needed a good standard of English before they were allowed to live here then half of the people on this board would have to emigrate.
As for Sikhs not wearing crash helmets, a turban isn’t a fashion accessory. They have to wear them as part of their religion. Again, what harm does it do to anybody else if Sikhs don’t wear crash helmets? Maybe those of you who are so concerned about the issue could dedicate your life to developing crash helmets that would fit over turbans.
Emma you say it doesn’t take a masters degree to read signs in a foreign language. You speak like someone who obviously hasn’t tried learning a foreign language. Could you read road signs written in Welsh, Czech, Chinese, Russian, or Arabic? Reading in a foreign language can be difficult if you’re unfamiliar with the language.
As for the idea that you can claim benefits for a family living overseas, well that’s just nonsense. If they don’t live with you here in this country then you can’t claim benefits for them.
The first Brixton riot was sparked by police harassment and the sus law. The second was sparked by the mistaken shooting of a suspect’s mother. The 3rd was sparked by the death of a man in police custody and the minor riot of 2001 followed demonstrations about the shooting of a man carrying a gun-shaped cigarette lighter. So they were all linked to police activity. As always with riots, you get some people who riot out of genuine anger about an issue, then you get the type who like a fight or like throwing stuff at the police, and then there are the opportunists who see a riot and then decide to go shopping.
When I think of race riots, I think of rioting between races like those that happened in liverpool and west london a long time ago. So I wouldn’t class the Brixton riots as race riots especially since the rioters were not exclusively of one race.
WTC7 wasn’t imploded by explosives, it collapsed due to fire and other structural damage caused by falling debris. The owner of the WTC didn’t say the building was imploded he said the FDNY decided to pull their operation which is what the FDNY say themselves. None of the conspiracies surrounding september 11 are credible, they’ve all been discredited by experts. People who choose to believe them are just ignoring the overwhelming amount of evidence that contradicts the conspiracy theories. It’s completely irrational just like those daft people who believe in haunted houses and communicating with the spirit world.
The guy said himself that a V8 twin turbo engine is noisy and frightening so that’s why he got convicted for breach of the peace. It’s understandable that the couple felt intimidated and don’t forget that witnesses told police that the driver was trying to intimidate them. So I don’t see any problem with the case.
