Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
So Emma finally admits that if the BNP were to take power then dissidents would be done away with. Thank you for your honesty Emma, it confirms what we all thought about the BNP.
The Greens are part of the London Assembly so they do have more political power than the BNP. Also, it was wrong for me to say that it was a monkey that achieved something that the BNP couldn’t, it was actually a man dressed up in a monkey suit. Obviously it was wrong for me to suggest that the BNP could compete with a man who campaigned in fancy-dress.
Funny how someone so opposed to “alien cultures” refers to the Asian St George and the semitic religion of Christianity in the signature of her posts.
People do get along as long as small-minded people don’t interfere with things. If you take the French world cup winning side the ethnicities ranged from all across the globe, Algeria, Armenia, France, Guadeloupe, Ghana, New Caledonia, etc. They all lived together for the duration of the tournament and clearly they got on well otherwise they wouldn’t have won. So it’s total bullsh1t to say people of different ethnicities can’t live together in the same society.
Emma I do help the less fortunate. I regularly try to help you come to rational conclusions on issues that your drink-addled brain can’t cope with. It’s not your fault that you’re a congenital idiot. It’s ok though, you don’t need to thank me for my generous help.
So your attitude is that nobody should ever be granted refugee status. So I guess you would like to see the white people who came here from Zimbabwe sent back. I also guess that you opposed Cyprus having to take all those British refugees who were fleeing Lebanon (yes it was only temporary but still must have been an inconvenience for Cyprus).
You probably would have opposed General de Gaulle, General Sikorski and Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands seeking refuge in the UK during WWII. However, that’s not too surprising since you would have supported the other side.
Well if an MP needs to see a person’s face in order to run an effective constituency surgery then lord only knows how David Blunkett managed to be an MP for so many years.
I agree 100%. It’s obvious to me that America is sowing the seeds of dictatorship and if successive administrations continue in the same authoritarian manner then dictatorship, or something very close to it, will be the inevitable long-term result.
Teddy Roosevelt said it best:
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
@emmalush wrote:
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
Your last post contradicts your entire argument. You say spending money on interpreters is a waste of money but then you say solving crimes is not a waste of money.
Whilst there here, using them to defend decency is ok. BUT, WE DO NOT NEED ASYLUM SEEKERS HERE, so we shouldn’t be spending 1p on ANY of them.
So what you’re now saying is that no money should be spent on solving a crime if an asylum seeker is involved in any way, or if an asylum seeker has any information relating to a crime.
No country NEEDS asylum seekers, it’s just what civilized people do i.e. give a helping hand to the less fortunate. Michael Howard, Albert Einstein and Madeleine Albright have all benefitted from the fact that countries have been willing to accept refugees.
@emmalush wrote:
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
when push comes to shove, the decent people of this country will stand up against the BNP
808,200 people voted BNP 2 years ago. It has become very difficult for them to get anywhere, whilst always shunned by media and mainstream political class.
The old gang are scared sheetless of the decency of policy that the BNP have, that decent people want. Whether it was the BNP, or the greens or respect, the old gang parties are too frightened to give them decent air time, and thus combine to stop anyone else getting edgeway.
Checkout the 2005 BNP Manifesto, the majority is what decent people want.
Otherwise, we want more war :(
Its time to stand up for yourself, stop reading the blag line of new labour and their new conservatism buddies via your goggle box. Even namby pamby political commentators were saying wednesday, that Cameron sounds like 1997 blair.
Contact your local BNP branch, go to a meeting, listen and workout for yourself if you agree with some of the most hard working men and women this country has to offer.
The difference between the Greens, Respect, Conservatives, Labour, etc. and the BNP is that the BNP control no local councils, they don’t have a single mayor, and not even 1 MP in the entire country. Not exactly the voice of the British people are they? Even a monkey was elected into office as a mayor but this is a feat that is beyond the BNP. The truth is that while British people may have concerns about immigration and europe and other issues most people wouldn’t dream of endorsing a neo-nazi organisation.
I didn’t really start the thread to bait anyone, it was just that I had mentioned Cable Street in a previous thread and then I noticed yesterday that it was the 70th anniversary. I can’t help seeing the similarities between the BUF and the BNP. The BNP are just a revamped version of old ideas. The ideas are the same, they are just presented differently in a more media savvy way to make the party look less extreme.
Olympic football teams are made up of young players with the allowance of a couple of older players. Most of Britain’s best players would be too old to play in the side, so there couldn’t be a British dream team.
The flaw in the Daily Mail article is that they assume that all the businesses would still be able to operate without the illegal workers. We know that the Daily Mail would oppose giving the workers legal status so that they could pay taxes, so you have to wonder what their point is.
It has to be said though that it certainly makes a change for the Daily Mail to complain about illegal immigrants engaged in employment. Their usual approach is to accuse immigrants (both legal and illegal) of coming here to live on benefits and fleece the british taxpayer which is obviously nonsense. The reason people emigrate is to earn a living not to live on paltry state benefits.
Of course the Daily Mail has a long history of hating immigrants. They were opposed to Jewish refugees coming to the UK in the 1930s and they were responsible for the notorious “Hooray for Mr Hitler” headline.
Your last post contradicts your entire argument. You say spending money on interpreters is a waste of money but then you say solving crimes is not a waste of money. Why do you think the police use interpreters? Do you think it gets a bit boring inside police stations and so the officers feel like chatting in exotic languages?
Once again your argument falls apart quicker than Dickie Barnbrook of the BNP can say “Hello Sailor”.
