Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
, so why don’t you come and sue me as well big boy.
because I don’t give a toss what you say. I am not the one forwarding unsubstantiated claims about. You and mooosey are doing that.
But if like mooosey you will throw unsubstantiated claims at me, that are unverifiable, not present any evidence, your case will be insipidly weak. You are entitled to make your claim, and I am entitled to make a counterclaim to it. But I cant make my counterclaim until you have presented your case and my barrister has read it. So do please hurry up x
Under those circumstances, I will hammer you in a court of law.
You must present evidence or be laughed out of the courtroom, with a big bill.
It’s not rocket science.
Even moooosey has figured that out. I quote..
“accusations and believing people are responsible for stuff is one thing , proving it is a different ball game”
“I don’t see any proof of anything….. “If this were real life now, you would be paying big time for your errors.
You would be paying a lot of money for my barristers fees.
My application to the judge for you to pay my barristers costs will be granted if you have forwarded a case, that gets dismissed on the grounds of lack of evidence. My counterclaim may also include a claim for libel, slander maybe perjury, and damages if you cant prove your claims.
This could get very expensive for you. I will bankrupt you and take your house off you for opening your mouth off with silly unsubstantiated claims x
You owe me about £5,000 in legal costs with this current situation so far. Any more shit from you and I will employ a senior partner who’s fees are double.
If I can get this into a courtroom, as a counterclaim, my fees with representation will
be getting close to about £50,000. This could get very expensive for you. I will bankrupt you and take your house off you for opening your mouth off with silly claims x“accusations and believing people are responsible for stuff is one thing , proving it is a different ball game”
“I don’t see any proof of anything….. “Bring it on sister x
Typical hypocrite mooosey, all mouth no trousers, where’s your evidence?
You seem to be on the defensive with that one. Why do you feel the need to explain yourself at such great length? If its all lies, leave it unchallenged, who are you proving yourself to? it isn’t me. Aaaah, well there’s always two sides to every story, maybe you felt a need to get your side across, so as no-one believes the bollox. I’d rather let the mislead, and misinformed fools believes the bollox. Too much knowledge is dangerous x
In the meantime..
You presented a few outrageous claims, that are totally unverifiable, unsubstantiated, and make you look like a twat. These claims must be presented in an organized manner, backed with evidence, before I can present my “counter claim”.
My counter claim remains unheard and unpresented, until you have fully presented your claims. Which you haven’t done yet. You have screamed a few insults.
Why are you making demands on my counterclaim? that don’t apply to your outrageous claims, when you haven’t even presented your case yet. The CPS won’t move this forward if you have no evidence. Innocent until proven guilty :)
You may be your own barrister and present your own case as best as you can, but you may not be the judge, or my judge.
You cannot be a barrister AND the judge.
But you can be an opiate addicted uptight old biddy screaming insults at a stranger online, hurling unsubstantiated claims. As long as you are screaming insults, you are not “winning” this little spat.
Please stop fannying about and present your evidence, and answer some of my many questions. Especially if you shall slyly ask your own questions whilst avoiding mine.
You take 1 line out of a conversation and twist it to look bad lol
Not quite. I am giving a snippet of my evidence which is a lot more than you have done. I can keep my evidence to myself until I have seen yours. You are the plaintiff, stfu and present your case x Let’s get this done with :) Speak now or forever hold your peace.
”“I’m not dim enough to give my details out to people I don’t know online…”
Neither am I, and if you think I am, then you are the dim one x Proof being, if I were dim enough to give them out, surely they’d have been plastered all over chat and the boards, by now, you would have them, don’t you agree?
I do not feed the trolls x
I have no charge to answer. Piss off with your unsubstantiated claims elsewhere x
-
This reply was modified 6 years, 7 months ago by Morgan..
To summarise:
Form is temporary, Leicester, Iceland, South Korea.
Class is permanent. Liverpool, ManUtd, Brazil, Barcelona.
You contradict yourself, you say class is permanent yet clearly not as we have seen from germany/Italy
You misinterpret me. I am not saying class will win EVERY time. I am saying it’s a very beneficial factor to consider when trying to determine winners of such events. That’s what the bookies were going on a year or two ago when setting the odds for this years World Cup, before they knew how current form and qualification would affect it. Hence Germany, Spain, Italy, Brazil, Argentina all being amongst the bookies favourites and expected winners.
what horse racing offspring has got to do with it, I’ve no idea
I was using it as an example of class, which we are discussing, as I assumed you would accept
Class is associated with pedigree. Horse Racing being a very good example. Class and form can and do often go hand in hand.
and pedigree being everything in top group Horse Racing.
Theres an old adage in football, you are only as good as your last match
Yes, I accept that. There’s also an old adage, Form is temporary, Class is permanent. Both good sayings.
Yet, Man City (or Utd) who are on a poor run of form, are playing Swindon who are on a very good run of form, in the FA Cup Final on Saturday. Who are you putting your shillings on? Who are the bookies odds on favourites?
Class will win that game in my opinion, not your last match result, or current form.
this class debate is irrelevant to who wins a football match , ask Germany.
In that case Korea should beat them time and time again?
Ok I wll ask ask Germany. They have replied: We had bad form, please can we have 10 rematches, we will win 9 of them. Ever heard of the one in ten?If you think villa are” bouncing back” you don’t watch much football with the club owing millions to the tax man having to sell their entire team- hardly bouncing back.
You have me there. My mistake. I mistakenly thought Villa had just been promoted back to Premier, which is why I wrote “bouncing back” it was Fulham instead. They weren’t far off, if my theory is right, they’ll do it next season.
Arguing class in a game of booting a ball about is melodramatic ..its a simple sport, the ” classier ” clubs afford better players so it boils down to if the squad is good enough or not.
It boils down to you have a rich elite of about 5 (or less) classy clubs who will dominate and win 9 of 10 of the major trophies. Form will dip, up and down. If City lose form, one or two of the others will find it. If Utd lose form one of the others will find it.
Other teams do not have the class to figure or disrupt this pattern. Leicester had very good form for a few months, alas they lacked the class (resources) to sustain it.
-
This reply was modified 6 years, 7 months ago by Morgan..
I’ve never snorted anything in my life. I think I have made my views on drink and drugs quite clear on these threads.
Why do you deny taking drugs?
I can’t see any denial of taking drugs in that statement, other than “snorting” them. I believe we have all taken drugs in one form or another.
you have just denied being a drug user, on this very thread
No I haven’t.
explain how you are NOT a drug user.
Why do you assume I am NOT, and that you know what I deem as “drugs” or not. I consider alcohol as a “drug” and I very occasionally enjoy a drink.
ridiculously claiming he doesn’t touch drugs.
Where was that claim made?
You really are twisting my words x
You just stated you would NOT respond further
No I never. I said we have nothing to chat about if we can’t respect usernames.. Do you call this chat? this is childish bickering that will be ending very soon, not chat. This is you being dismissed the slightly long and polite way, it’s not chat x
Morgan is open to all questions put forward.
You wanted constructive debate not bickering x
Blossom, as I said. Usernames only :)
I assumed you directed the post at me, Morgan. Was I wrong?
and that you got your usernames muddled x
-
This reply was modified 6 years, 7 months ago by Morgan..
Ge, you may address me under my user name as I do you.
If you can not show the common decency to do that, even after request, I have nothing to chat to you about.
-
This reply was modified 6 years, 7 months ago by
be getting close to about £50,000. This could get very expensive for you. I will bankrupt you and take your house off you for opening your mouth off with silly claims x