Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
1 August, 2007 at 9:49 am #278551
@lil fek wrote:
What bothers me about “unrestricted on demand abortions” is that it would be used, by some, as a method of birth control i.e repeat abortions.
Which was a thought I had when writing it . Birth control is the key here not abortion versus giving birth.
I really don’t think someone would have 50 children but if they were using it as birth control they might have 50 abortions and if it wasn’t on demand they would have to be more careful. It is not about them not having abortions and giving birth..its about using it as birth control. Like being careless and not worrying about the consequences as they can have an abortion on demand. So more and more people could be having abortions and giving birth and using it as birth control and thats makes additional costs.
1 August, 2007 at 8:45 am #278549It’s clear that you didn’t read the initial post properly and so it goes on and on and on so that you can have the last word and think youre right…but youre not!
And now you are asking me to prove that you are right by justifying what you thought I said. Quite clever really!
1 August, 2007 at 8:12 am #278547I didn’t make a mistake and you know it…and always remember Uber you have the right to remain silent!
1 August, 2007 at 7:48 am #278545Go away..it’s time for you to go to work now byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee :D
1 August, 2007 at 7:37 am #278543What point? You are talking about a child growing up versus an abortion. I WASN”T!
But to clarify further:
If someone had 20 abortions and gave birth to 3 children they would be using unrestricted abortions as birth control – which would be an additional cost to the health system – but if they were restricted they would not have had them, because they couldn’t be used as birth control.
Drain…to become empty
Burden…to load or overload
Don’t believe everything you think!
1 August, 2007 at 6:44 am #280178This has always made me laugh…two dogs chatting, one says to the other ” met someone wonderful in a chatroom…and then I found out she was a cat.”
Keep them donuts coming lol
1 August, 2007 at 6:06 am #278538@ubermik wrote:
OMG I cant believe someone wheeled out the “its a drain on the health serivice” twaddle lol
Some people will sink to any level to try and fashion what they think is a reasonable arguement out of total manure :D:D:D
How much of a “drain” will the non aborted little foetus be on the NHS for the following 9 months? How much of a drain on the school system for the following 16 years? How much of a drain on the NHS’ dental services? How much of a drain on their GP? How much of a drain on public services such as rubhish disposal, playgroups, social services and even the police when its a teenager and in typical single parent offspring stylee starts working on their criminal degree and asbo collection?
Yet you think one friggin abortion is MORe of a drain on public funds than all of that? HAHAHA, some people :lol: :lol: :lol:
Wow when I read your rant I thought you were talking about another post until someone pointed out it was mine lol.
Nowhere did it say it was a drain on the health service, that was your interpretation of “causing a burden on the health system” and an incorrect one. My concern was people using unrestricted abortions as a method of birth control, not one abortion but many per person and many people using it, therefore, causing the health system additional services that it does not need.
“Some people will sink to any level to try and fashion what they think is a reasonable arguement out of total manure “
You give me way too much credit!
30 July, 2007 at 11:30 pm #280712Was he the jeweller in Snatch?
30 July, 2007 at 11:26 pm #280066I’ll back Southy on this one!
27 July, 2007 at 9:22 am #280176That’s deffo Brad…………..but didn’t he look better in the chatroom! lol
-
AuthorPosts