Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
26 August, 2007 at 7:04 am #284604
Wb PB….glad you are back safe and sound!
23 August, 2007 at 1:01 pm #284363Hi susieann…have I seen you in the chats?
23 August, 2007 at 12:41 pm #284284You didn’t say it was couples so why would one assume it was men and women when you stated women.
“Why would they “obviously” have problems?”
Counselling defination:
1. Help with personal problems: help with personal or psychological matters usually given by a professional
2. Meetings with counsellor: meetings with a counselor to receive help with personal or psychological problems
3. Counselling, broadly defined, includes ‘therapy and psychotherapy’.All counselling involves psychology. Unless you didn’t actually mean counselling and in that case please be more specific!
“Oh and Should chivalry be dead? I think that is up to the man”
“Why “the man”? Surely both people should have a say in the matter? An EQUAL say too”
Chivalry defination:
1. Gallant or distinguished gentlemen
2. The rules and customs of medieval knighthood.
3. The qualities idealized by knighthood, such as bravery, courtesy, honor, and gallantry toward women.That is why I think it is up to a man, they have every right to continue being chivalrous if they so desire. Although, I believe chivalry is outdated, it’s not for me to say that men can’t continue being chivalrous.
As said at the beginning of this thread:
@lil fek wrote:
I believe chivalry is totally outdated. The roles of men and women have changed so much and while some women prefer a gallant man, others would find it irritating. Good manners and respect is what is needed by men and women equally.
I don’t know why you can’t understand what I am saying, I thought it was quite clear. However, I am now taking a course in Uberspeak which I hope will enable you to understand what I write.
22 August, 2007 at 6:52 pm #284280Lol Shazza I was still editing my post and there you were grrr that’ll teach me not to preview…well to finish what I saying about men and chivalry..if men want to be gallant it’s entirely up to them ..it’s not for us to say they cant.
22 August, 2007 at 6:36 pm #284278“The thing here tho is more one of what we ARE supposed to be seeking as a society “
“Chivalry is for the most part a description of something men do in the presence of women and therefore has no real place in a society seeking equality and common gender devoid courtesy with no special exceptions or treatment for “women” would therefore be the replacement”
@lil fek wrote:
Good manners and respect is what is needed by men and women equally.
With regards to the women you counselled..they obviously had problems or wouldn’t have been there……….I hope you showed them the error of their ways!
Oh and Should chivalry be dead? I think that is up to the man!
22 August, 2007 at 5:45 am #284271I believe chivalry is totally outdated. The roles of men and women have changed so much and while some women prefer a gallant man, others would find it irritating. Good manners and respect is what is needed by men and women equally.
15 August, 2007 at 2:00 am #282935Yes Pats! I do!!! Get ya back door out…. Mr gay gay is on his way way! :D
LMAO… keep the faith!
15 August, 2007 at 1:36 am #278570No, they don’t have any say unless it is a loving relationship (boo fucking hoo) because quite frankly Uber you are just a sperm donor, nothing more; nothing less, thats all you are, get used to it!
It is the women’s body, the woman’s right to choose if she keeps the fetus..NOT YOURS….but if you decide to impregnate a woman and they can prove it then you pay for your spawn..so be careful where you leave your spunk.
I don’t know who you associate with but from your obvious insults to women it’s someone that has hurt and taken advantage of you and for that I’m sorry. Not all women are like that!
2 August, 2007 at 8:09 am #277523Toymaker Fisher Price is to recall almost one million Chinese-made toys over fears that their paint contains too much lead.
An internal probe found the Chinese manufacturer had used a non-approved paint pigment, violating its safety standards, the company said.
The recall affects 83 types of toy that have been on sale in the US since May.
It is the latest in a series of safety scares involving goods – food, drugs and other products – made in China.
Mattel Inc, which owns Fisher Price, said that the recall affected a total of 967,000 toys, including characters popular with young children such as Sesame Street’s Big Bird and Elmo.
The company said that it was removing the products from shops and would intercept incoming shipments.
bbc.co.uk
1 August, 2007 at 10:02 am #278552@ubermik wrote:
Just claiming you have been missunderstood without providing a clearer version of what you did say is to say the least pointless and will appear like the witterings of someone who wasnt missunderstood but cant think of an effective spin on what they did say, so why not just explain what you ACTUALLY meant in a clearer way IF as you claim what was written wasnt what was meant?
Simpler surely than an endless but non clairifying series of “but you missunderstood me”‘s?
Lmao not once have I said I was misunderstood..I said you didn’t read the post properly and I have never said what was written wasn’t what was meant. You are making things up now!
-
AuthorPosts