Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
30 March, 2010 at 9:05 pm #69239
:D :) :lol:
pleasure ;)
30 March, 2010 at 9:04 pm #432694:D :) :) :lol:
dotes
14 January, 2010 at 11:13 am #145354:D :) :o
oh…. most definitely the coming weekend
:D :D :D16 September, 2009 at 11:44 pm #415464RIP patrick
13 August, 2009 at 10:23 am #403817:D :) :lol:
I dont think its the case that Hammond wanted to have it splattered all over the news, lets put it into perspective, it was an accident at a roundabout, where some1 slowed or stopped and the peeps behind went into each other, he was on the end of that line of peeps.
i am sure he would rather it not fodder for the masses.
I do have quite a dangerous job and have been in the local newspaper where i live, i would rather not have been in the newspaper either
however some1 somewhere thought that it should be sojust something to think about…….
16 July, 2009 at 10:24 am #400813:D :) :lol:
I think i have to largely agree with my respected predecessor (above) Quiet Man,It would appear that as the vote already taken did not ‘please’ then voting shall begin again and again until it brings about the ‘right’ vote.
is this actually right in its self, is it legal to keep making peeps vote for something they have obviously made their opinions known?I am bordering on being an anti-euope peep i think.
I would prefer that as a country (UK) we need to keep some form of identity and systems that we as a country run ourselves via our government, not be governed by peeps who do not, probobly have not and will not live in that country they are trying to govern.
does that make sense?
thats where i stand at the moment…..
I am open to others opinion and it would do me gd to hear (or read) them
:wink:5 July, 2009 at 5:53 pm #400262:D :) :lol:
wow….. well said Jewel
i think i agree with all your points, which is what i was trying to say but not as eloquently
:wink:5 July, 2009 at 4:58 pm #400258@forumhostpb wrote:
Frankly, the worst thing you can do with one of these keyboard gangsters is to respond to their provocation. It only encourages them to continue having a go at you. When there isn’t a ChatGuide around and you are on the wrong end of such puerile behaviour … please use the ignore facility – that’s what it is there for.
Ahhhhh ‘the iggy button’ precisely what it says on the tin basically, but so very under-rated and under-utilised.
I have been watching in the rooms and you can actually see the ‘regulars’ start to wind up said ‘naughyt kiddies’ or wind each other up, instead of using said ‘iggy button’….
fascinating to watch, mob culture at its very best i might add.
Why not just iggy the sad B*******/naughty kiddies instead of letting the comments get to you, thats what they do…say something about your mum/dad/kids/dog/cat/uncle dave/aunty flo and so on and so on…..
Unfortunately sometimes i have seen ‘the regs’ get booted too for being abusive, and rightly so, if a guide is there all parties arguing in a chat room (oh pls) should be booted until they can behave like adults.
I can honestly say in all my yrs coming in JC (and thats a fair few now) i still find it amusing and very strange how peeps will argue/abuse/and wind each other up even over a comp screen…. net life aye….. :shock:5 July, 2009 at 4:26 pm #400021@(f)politics? wrote:
and who said u could say owt jay lol ;) hows u hunni xxx
*whips PB with my wet marigolds *and yeah pb they mean the same u know me and my long rambling posts i often repeat myself lol
I am all gd ta Pol mummy :) XXX
…o0(oh thats what you do with mariglods….. ooooo….now theres a thought….)
and hows you?? :)2 July, 2009 at 7:09 pm #400230:D :) :lol:
I ate Will…… sorry :shock: :shock: :shock: :wink:
-
AuthorPosts