[J_in_France]

@panda12 wrote:

@j_in_france wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

@j_in_france wrote:

Years ago I worked with a lad who had a medical condition that meant he had severe BO

Nice person, sad problem.

Is he a person you move seats to avoid?

Yes. And I’m sure there were times when you moved to get away from the smell of your work colleague unless of course you like that smell. I personally can’t stand it.

As I said he had a medical condition – that gives you a choice to either understand the problems that

person has in life or make them a social outcast – my choice was obviously different to yours

I’m talking about a complete fooking stranger on a train! How does my moving seat make them a social outcast? I don’t get up, point at them and shout, “you stink so I’m moving seat!”

And after a certain recent post of yours, you have no right in taking any moral high ground.

You are supposedly a mortuary technician

I would guess that being such would make you immune to most smells

Love the fact that you have to use other posts of mine to try and support your argument

[J_in_France]

@panda12 wrote:

@j_in_france wrote:

Years ago I worked with a lad who had a medical condition that meant he had severe BO

Nice person, sad problem.

Is he a person you move seats to avoid?

Yes. And I’m sure there were times when you moved to get away from the smell of your work colleague unless of course you like that smell. I personally can’t stand it.

As I said he had a medical condition – that gives you a choice to either understand the problems that person has in life or make them a social outcast – my choice was obviously different to yours

[J_in_France]

Years ago I worked with a lad who had a medical condition that meant he had severe BO

Nice person, sad problem.

Is he a person you move seats to avoid?

[J_in_France]

I really like this thread – page 73 has some of the best humourous put downs I have seen for anyone who can be arsed to look at it

[J_in_France]

duwpin wrote:

all threads stray from topic
i mean j
i posted about the new guides
and off you went with some disgusting thoughts about children

thin I have never said you are a kiddy fiddler as you chose to put it but if you are content to say you have never before been accused of being such then I will keep quiet

[J_in_France]

@panda12 wrote:

@j_in_france wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

@j_in_france wrote:

I would disagree that ‘all’ killers have a motive because I think that in some circumstances people do something without realising the consequences but another person may end up dead .

I am referrng to killers who are murderers, which this thread is about, not killers who are not murderers.

In England, murder has to have two components present, Mens Rea and Actus Reus. The former is the mental thought to commit murder, the latter is the act itself.

Killers who are not murderers are considered to be guilty of manslaughter. Actus Reus is present but not Mens Rea.
so
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actus_reus

I thought this thread. given its title. was about Mohamed Merah and what he did was done in France, so English law would not be applicable

France also splits killing into murder and manslaughter categories.

The thread is about Mohamed Merah not about the law in England or France

[J_in_France]

@panda12 wrote:

@j_in_france wrote:

I would disagree that ‘all’ killers have a motive because I think that in some circumstances people do something without realising the consequences but another person may end up dead .

I am referrng to killers who are murderers, which this thread is about, not killers who are not murderers.

In England, murder has to have two components present, Mens Rea and Actus Reus. The former is the mental thought to commit murder, the latter is the act itself.

Killers who are not murderers are considered to be guilty of manslaughter. Actus Reus is present but not Mens Rea.
so
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actus_reus

I thought this thread. given its title. was about Mohamed Merah and what he did was done in France, so English law would not be applicable

[J_in_France]

As you said – reports said but that does not mean it was to be trained by El Q

I went to Oxford – that was every day to work

I would disagree that ‘all’ killers have a motive because I think that in some circumstances people do something without realising the consequences but another person may end up dead .

[J_in_France]

Did he actually go to Pakistan to be trained?

Was he motivated by the fact that Palestinian children had been killed or was that just an excuse?

There are many questions that can be asked in situations like this one and most of them will never be possible to answer. He could quite simply have been a complete nutter who tried to explain what he did by blaming other things

[J_in_France]

@duwpin wrote:

of course he might have been innocent though :shock:

:? of course he might have been but that would be ignoring the fact he admitted to the murders, all three times which he filmed and that he went out all guns blazing :shock:

[Author]

Posts