Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
21 July, 2012 at 10:24 pm #504167
@terry wrote:
@j_in_france wrote:
quite right terry – drama queen’s should be banned from buying 99’s from ice cream shops and I leave it to jen-jen as to what she does with the flake
I wonder how jen jen would eat a flake.
why would she want to eat it? gas mark 200 for 2 hours is best for most flakes
21 July, 2012 at 10:14 pm #504162quite right terry – drama queen’s should be banned from buying 99’s from ice cream shops and I leave it to jen-jen as to what she does with the flake
19 July, 2012 at 9:28 pm #503882@minim wrote:
People sometimes give too much of themselves, without knowing the person they are trusting very well, I guess. No matter how used to the internet and chat world we all think we are, it is still easy to get taken in by people with no scruples. It is also difficult to factor in those people for whom life is different, whose judgements are skewed a little, and that can cause problems.
If you know you are dealing with someone who can be a bit shall we say flakey, then you adjust your behaviour towards them accordingly. But that can often take time to figure out and by then, it may be a bit too late.
I actually don’t think any bullying is going on at all. I just think that this environment causes misunderstandings and misjudgements and some people can’t deal with the way it pans out. If someone is even the tiniest bit paranoid, chat rooms/msn/etc etc can make them even more paranoid, and distressed. But also, I think the odd person likes to pretend grievances in order to be the centre of attention. They spam the boards with perceived slights and angst and wait for the fall out, along the lines that negative attention is better than no attention at all.
I know I am not saying anything you don’t all already know, so forgive me for preaching to the converted! :wink:
great post – sometimes people can not accept that others are what they are and feel a need to in some way try to put them down
Chat is about knowing who you talk to and trusting that what is said in private remains so
19 July, 2012 at 9:13 pm #503862I have to say I like the guides and think they do a great job sometimes in very difficult circumstances
18 July, 2012 at 10:26 pm #501674@lucylocket wrote:
Im gonna write my own lesi book called 50 shades of pink to open the eyes to the misconception of lesbians to str8 ppl haha
50 shades of grey is about as relevant to a Dom/sub lifestyle as is using a rotavator to mow a lawn so anything Lucy added would be more interesting
14 July, 2012 at 10:58 pm #502247I have an engagement ring and a wedding ring.
The engagement ring is sadly a replacement of the original that somehow was lost on the day of our wedding anniversary when we went to celebrate it at a restaurant in the village next to where today’s Tour de France stage finished. Though it is a replacement it is very similar to the original and I where it all the time.
The wedding ring was bought a few years after we were married because at the time we could not afford it. I do not wear it all the time because I am right handed and found it caught on things quite often so purely for safety reasons it is safer not to wear it.
Personally for me they are both very significant though one is a replacement and the other bought after the event the meaning is the important thing.
14 July, 2012 at 10:43 pm #501660I think finally the reality of how awful 50 shades of rubbish is, is now being realised.
The best reply I have read in this thread has been Poli’s post on page two which has shown a lot of reasoning and reality. 50 shades of rubbish bears no similarity to real life nor anything that would be in the least bit possible.
Quite honestly what is the purpose of punishing someone for doing something wrong when they don’t know that they have done something wrong? I guess the whole point of Poli’s post was that a dominant is a guide to the submissive and not someone who indiscriminately hit’s someone with a belt.
When we lived in the UK we had a couple of friends where we lived and though they would never have accepted it they were the most dom/sub couple you could ever meet by their actions which in no way could be described in 50 shades of rubbish.
50 shades of rubbish is just that – rubbish!
14 July, 2012 at 1:06 am #502028@panda12 wrote:
I did say I wasn’t going to post on this thread again but as I am doing so I am obviously lying.
Now seeing as John Terry has been found Not Guilty by A Magistrates Court and not by a Jury made up of his fellow peers, I feel empowered.
Ok so as I’m half black and half white, then I’m totally justified in saying, “f u c k off you f u c k i n g black c u n t s.”
And also:
“F u c k off you f u c k i n g corn beef c u n t s! Call yourself white? You’re f u c k i ng corn beef! And you go to your fake tan sessions because you don’t want to look like corn beef!”
I am sorry Panda but I don’t see the reasoning behind your posting. All I see is nasty swear words and language I personally would never use anywhere.
13 July, 2012 at 10:05 pm #502228well I did not win the Super Lotto which was for 13 million euros as it is played on Friday the 13th nor did I win the Euromillions of 75 million euros. C’est la vie but there is tomorrow and Tuesday to wait for now or is that a pointless (or euroless) pursuit?
13 July, 2012 at 9:57 pm #502025A week long court case, loads of money paid to lawyers and the like, but at the end of the day what was it all about? Two testosterone challenged footballers trading insults and I personally don’t think the colour issue was part of it, but once you go down that road it is hard to back out.
-
AuthorPosts