[J_in_France]

@jen_jen wrote:

I was hoping for a thought-provoking thread, I was disappointed.

And I look at all new threads, regardless of title…maybe next time I’ll be more selective and look at who started the thread first…

bluster

[J_in_France]

@jen_jen wrote:

@j_in_france wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

@jen_jen wrote:

I love it when the reasons that you start a thread are completely missed… :roll:

I get your point. Cameron seems to think that paedophilia and homosexuality are inextricably linked.

They are not, of course.

Does he?

Why else, when being asked about a child abuse case and handed a list of suspected paedophiles, would he warn against public child abuse allegations turning into a “witch-hunt” against gay people? A witch hunt against paedophiles, yes, but what has homosexuality got to do with it?

My other reason for starting the thread was around the fact that when the child abuse witch hunt was centred on “celebrities” and, more specifically, the BBC, the Government were perfectly happy for names and accusations to be bandied around to the point of demanding a public enquiry, yet as soon as there’s a whiff of politicians being involved in child abuse it suddenly becomes a witch hunt.

so the names on the card that schofield showed to cameron are the names of paedophiles?

[J_in_France]

@jen_jen wrote:

Sad, very sad…

you looked

[J_in_France]

@panda12 wrote:

@j_in_france wrote:

Just thought I would see how many views this topic got

Will you be excluding the number of times you click on it to boost your view count?

you looked

[J_in_France]

@panda12 wrote:

@j_in_france wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

@jen_jen wrote:

I love it when the reasons that you start a thread are completely missed… :roll:

I get your point. Cameron seems to think that paedophilia and homosexuality are inextricably linked.

They are not, of course.

Does he?

Why don’t you read the opening post of this thread before you post your inane comments?

ok panda – perhaps you can explain the reasons for the opening post which jen_jen has said that everyone has missed the reason for?

[J_in_France]

@terry wrote:

@danny2011 wrote:

if u need it explaining terry shame on u 4 not even knowing what happened that day

Tell me what happened on November 11, 2011

Rememberance Day last year

[J_in_France]

@panda12 wrote:

@jen_jen wrote:

I love it when the reasons that you start a thread are completely missed… :roll:

I get your point. Cameron seems to think that paedophilia and homosexuality are inextricably linked.

They are not, of course.

Does he?

[J_in_France]

@jen_jen wrote:

I love it when the reasons that you start a thread are completely missed… :roll:

so what were your reasons?

[J_in_France]

@terry wrote:

@jen_jen wrote:

What intrigues me more is how we can go from a simple glib statement from Terry about who Kim Kardashian is (and of course he knows she’s female, her picture is all over the place, I don’t read newspapers or watch tv and even I can’t get away from her!) to a condemnation of people for – gasp – using fake names and daring to use obviously fake photos

A good post jen. =D>

I just wish J_in_France would wind his neck in sometimes.

you can wish teresa but if I disagree with what you say I will say so

[J_in_France]

@wakeupdeadisgodlike wrote:

@j_in_france wrote:

what you see is what you get with me

That’s unfortunate for you if true as all we see is a total dipshit.

Nice to see you pop up braindead – sad numpty

[Author]

Posts