Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
personally I find this vote sad even when wrapped up in terms of not being racist
a persons colour really does not matter as to who the person is
@sceptical guy wrote:
I agree with tinks on this.
Cameron was caught by surprise and made a good point in a dignified yet angry manner. The old canard that homosexuality and pedophilia were the same can still rear its ugly head. People have been pasting names of politicians and celebrities who are openly gay or not yet outed, and smearing them wiht pedophile claims.
It’s a nasty smear. Once someone is accused, it’s impossible to shake off the taint, no matter how unjustified.
The politican who was claimed to be at the heart of the Wrexham child abuse scandals was just assumed to be guilty. I assumed him to be guilty as well. The victim named him, after all.
Now we find out that he doesn’t seem to be guilty. It was a guy with the same surname.
That’s how witch hunts work. Look at a play called The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, or see the movie with Daniel Day Lewis. It’s about the Salem witch trials of 1692, but applies to any witch hunt.
Jake Arnott, the novelist, made the rigtht point about Cameron yesterday. Thirty years ago, no Tory politican would be seen dead defending gay marriage or gay rights.
That’s what a genuinely surprised Cameron was doing.
Schofield is digusting, and is rightly making his grovelling apologies.
good post scep
throwing mud at people means some will stick especially using the internet where it is easy to hide behind nom de plumes
if phillip schofield thinks internet rumours are real then he really needs to think again
we have been on the receiving end of lies – it is not pleasant but it says more about the people who make false accusations
@pepsi wrote:
:lol:
Lol @ this thread
Reminds me the music and lyrics to Marvin Gaye’s sensual song …wonderful.
:lol:
“And its good for you …..
great link pepsi
just off to wake up Helen
@momentaryloss wrote:
@j_in_france wrote:
@wordsworth60 wrote:
@j_in_france wrote:
@wordsworth60 wrote:
@j_in_france wrote:
@wordsworth60 wrote:
@jen_jen wrote:
If you find sex sad you’re either doing it wrong or with the wrong person :wink:
Doing it with the wrong person can be more interesting, it not more pleasurable . . . .
lol Words I wouold not dare
Sometimes the only difference between the right person and the wrong person is timing . . . .
maybe but after 30 years with the right person I guess my timing is correct
It’s the other person’s opinion which counts – especially if you’re only guessing . . . . .
never needed to guess – and if you need to just ask Helen
Is she an expert?
as you asked – how would you define an expert?
@panda12 wrote:
@j_in_france wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
If I wrote a letter like that where there is a glaring grammatical error in the first sentence, and which showed my lack of vocabulary by repetition of words such as allegedly and understand, I wouldn’t put it in the public domain.
And he’s an MP?
so you disagree with what it says?
You really are dumb. :roll:
am I? why is that?
@panda12 wrote:
@terry wrote:
If I wrote a letter like that where there is a glaring grammatical error in the first sentence, and which showed my lack of vocabulary by repetition of words such as allegedly and understand, I wouldn’t put it in the public domain.
And he’s an MP?
so you disagree with what it says?
@jen_jen wrote:
If you’d like to read and comment on the article, the opening post or any other of the points made in this thread then we have the makings of an interesting debate. If, however, your sole intent is to play one-upmanship, well that just doesn’t interest me.
You dislike me, fine, but do everyone else a favour and either ignore me or try to keep to the topic of the thread. Most of us come here to chat, debate, banter, not compete.
nice rhetoric but what did your original post really say?
@wordsworth60 wrote:
@j_in_france wrote:
@wordsworth60 wrote:
@j_in_france wrote:
@wordsworth60 wrote:
@jen_jen wrote:
If you find sex sad you’re either doing it wrong or with the wrong person :wink:
Doing it with the wrong person can be more interesting, it not more pleasurable . . . .
lol Words I wouold not dare
Sometimes the only difference between the right person and the wrong person is timing . . . .
maybe but after 30 years with the right person I guess my timing is correct
It’s the other person’s opinion which counts – especially if you’re only guessing . . . . .
never needed to guess – and if you need to just ask Helen
@jen_jen wrote:
You’ve already commented on that, surely you haven’t forgotten already?
lol so I was right in what I said – you really need to keep on track with your aspersions rather than trying to score points on every single post you make because you backtrack far too often
