[genie_in_a_butthole]

@emmalush wrote:

@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:

1/ Not relevent, you didn’t answer the question.

2/ So you would abolish religion out of hand

You still didn’t answer the question, WHERE would they go?

3/ So your not going to promote it, so you believe a man or woman wakes up one day and says “hmmm my wife/husband is annoying me, i think i’ll sleep with someone of the same sex as me”, promotion has nothing to do with homosexuality, acceptance is the message not “Go on, be gay…you know you want to”. Your non-promotion of it will change nothing so why cite it in your agenda…pointless.

1. You offer money to encourage people to leave.

2. I never said that. People who thought that their religion amongst others, is something that is workable would have to learn that it isnt the way forward. Weve tried it. If they wont listen, then they would be encouraged to leave the country, where they go is up to them. Its a very very complex situation, the majority belief may have to be implemented, pointless just aboloshing all political religion if theres uproar.

3. I believe that the best sexual framework for a successfull society is the promotion of hetrosexuality, the family whereby one of man and woman are the leaders equally bringing up children.
Im not saying you cant be gay, nor have a religious belief, im saying that there needs to be a core belief system, that is what we stand for, because multi-faith/culture/sexual longing doesn’t work.
This means that non hetrosexuals, atleast all but one faith, all those bar the English and white people, will feel left out. Seems harsh, but the point is, weve tried the opposite.

An alternative is to segregate society, so that we have sexual, religious, nationality and colour cities. I dont mind that, atleast everyone can follow their belief system under a british government.

1/ Is Bribery an official policy of the BNP then?
Where would this money come from? My Taxes?

2/ What is the difference between religion and political religion?
If England adopted a non-multicultural approach and foreign countries did the same, where would they physically go?

3/ Are you saying you want a society of 1 race, 1 religious belief system, 1 sexual preference etc?
That has been tried before Emma, it was called Nazism. Then again, your system here is almost the definition of Facism…well done.

[genie_in_a_butthole]

@emmalush wrote:

@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:

I shall now respond like you often do Emma.

You did it my way :wink:

“Stop generalising”
That wasn’t generalising.

Correct. Neither was the BNP :wink:

Buy a dictionary.

Which one, there not all the same apparently. Which dictionary would you say is the most accurate of the English language?

Any dictionary should help to some degree…have the BNP published a dictionary, i see your point, their definitions would vary from others dramatically.

Possible definitions from a BNP dictionary.

democracy – White English people having the oppurtunity to vote for a White English party.
communist – anyone who disagrees with the BNP.
criminal – anyone who commits a crime except BNP supporters who commit crimes.
activist – A BNP advocate who commits gang rape.
freedom – BNP supporters right to assault non-whites.
etc
etc
etc

[genie_in_a_butthole]

@emmalush wrote:

@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:

“Who said he gets to decide?”
He did – “I turned on the television yesterday at about 8.00 am”.

Oh you mean just that one programme and maybe others, thought you were generalising…

Expose who, there are no posts to expose…can you find threads to the contrary.

You’ve tried exposing a few BNP stories, try exposing their enimies?

You’ve put a great deal of effort into critising the BNP, and have pledged to revitalise the entertainment industry with more comical debate, are you really neutral?

No i wasn’t generalising, maybe Kevin Hughes was, they were his words.

How can i expose the truth behind threads by the “enemies” of the BNP, when that position has not been vociferated on these boards.

Never said i was neutral, in fact never said any of the things you say here. Your obviously confusing me with other people…oh wait i forgot, i am everyone that has ever disagreed with you.

[genie_in_a_butthole]

How do i vote for all 3.

[genie_in_a_butthole]

Lets look at these convictions again…

They include gang rape, armed robbery, theft, assault, hooliganism, possession of firearms, drug possession, car theft, burglary, unlawful wounding, possession of explosives etc etc etc.

So i can see your point that with these people in charge, we would be living in a “Safer” society…(sarcasm)

“You cannot know the complete ins n outs of the minds of those who join your organisation.” or who run it, it seems…

[genie_in_a_butthole]

@emmalush wrote:

@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:

They already have.

And the BNP will kick em out. You cannot know the complete ins n outs of the minds of those who join your organisation.

You have chosen the criminals side Emma.
Nick Griffin (Party Chairman) His magazine The Rune carried obscene anti-Semitic and Holocaust denial

How the hell is that criminal???

genie, why dont you and your marxist friends encourage society segregation from the white hetrosexual patriotic community?

You’re scared stiff, you know your ideal society would crumble, you couldn’t cope without the hard working majority.

What you do, is blag our people with guilt that they are “bad” if they dont agree with you.

Typical Emma, quote part of a sentence.
Re: Nick Griffin, the entire paragraph read “Received a two-year suspended sentence in April 1998 for inciting racial hatred. His magazine The Rune carried obscene anti-Semitic and Holocaust denial material as well as crude racism.”

So your question “How the hell is that criminal” is answered. You should know this already as i have said it time and time again…ohhhhhhhhhh i forgot, you only have a selected memory.

Everything else on this post is just wishful thinking and nonsence.

[genie_in_a_butthole]

@emmalush wrote:

@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:

1/ Yes it is fair for “the multiculturalists” to point at you and call you racist, thats the right freedom of speach affords them, and you are racist anyway.

2/ This isn’t a question.

3/ To vague a question. I would prefer a BP without a DC, but were an MP to ask for a WP, i would agree but only ofter a CCJ was issued to the PB with an express order not to violate the FGW.

5/ Too sweeping a statement, according to the BNP website, Kevin Hughes’ cell is like “third world squalor”, is this just propoganda then Emma? Hypocrites.

6/ Yes.

7/ We should train unemployed people, irrelevent of color, so no i don’t strictly agree with BNP policy. I think you will find these kind of policies in any parties agenda, but then again, you only read 1 parties views.

8/ Have a black muslim haemaphrodite as its leader.

1. For not liking multiculturalism?? I love being racist, i believe in the specific ability of JC posters to post posts. I expect if you do, you’re racist too.

2. Thousands of people have asked the BBC for a BNP panelist. Should this publicly funded company be held account for not listening to the wishes of their employers (us)?

3. Can you explain what DC and co mean?

5. What constitutes third world squalor?

6. So you want out of the EU?

7. But you agree with BNP policy that we should train our unemployed people before foriegners?

8. Why would a non muslim white person with one genital organ like you, wana be ruled by someone so opposite?

1/ I didn’t say you were racist for not liking multiculturalist. I simply stated a fact that you agree with, you “love being racist”. I have prejudice in me like us all but not down to race per se, i do however believe we all have a degree of racism in us.

2/ Yes.

3/ No, i made them up.

4/ oh you missed out 4.

5/ Ask Kevin Hughes, they are his words.

6/ I didn’t say that, please don’t presume to answer questions for me, by me answering that i would “prefer to have more foreign nurses, bobbies on the beat etc and how we coped before EU membership, than wasting the billions we do on it now” does not mean i want out of the EU. I have already answered that earlier.

7/ No and have never answered to that effect.

8/ How do you know i am not a black muslim haemaphrodite?

[genie_in_a_butthole]

@emmalush wrote:

@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:

What a surprise, i go away for a weekend

And slayer took over…absolutely perfect timing.

apparently anyone that disagree’s with Emma is me or vice versa.

You’re in SUCH a huff over this :D

The BNP paranoia is carrying you away Emma.

Im quite prepared to learn you’re not slayer.

Unlike Emma, I do occasionally leave my house and as such my PC, so was unable to post on here this weekend. This weekend i was actually down the docks at the “Communists against the BNP” meeting…

With laptop and slayer’s password :D

Anyone looking at my style of writing and slayers will see a huge difference, the fact we have both answered Emma’s questions with different answers should be a clue.

Yes but you’re atleast partly clever :wink:

And which monkey added the 4th option? Oh PB was it DOA, is that because i made him look stupid again recently…

Hold on a minuteeeeeeeeeeeee, hmm, poster genie starts his post with
“What a surprise, i go away for a weekend and Emma’s paranoia comes surging out“

And the 4th option (not mine)
“I think our resident BNP spokesman is paranoid about criticism.”

PB was quiet last week, is genie, PB? Is PB, slayer and genie?

:D

I’m Spartacus.

[genie_in_a_butthole]

@emmalush wrote:

Now i think about it more, you are like PB aswell. You’ve posted 2 polls about me since the one about you and slayer. PB is well known for his daft, child like behaviour, isnt funny so resorts to changing people’s poll options, just cos he can.

I confess…i am ForumhostPB, ChathostUK, Slayer, DOA, UGO, Smiley, Geoff, Pats etc etc, in fact Justchat only has 2 message board posters, You Emma and i am everyone else…

I should have realised PB added the 4th option because you don’t have it in you (like the BNP) to give an objective, counter option to your belief.

[genie_in_a_butthole]

What a surprise, i go away for a weekend and Emma’s paranoia comes surging out, apparently anyone that disagree’s with Emma is me or vice versa.

The BNP paranoia is carrying you away Emma.

“They’re coming to take you away ha ha”.

Unlike Emma, I do occasionally leave my house and as such my PC, so was unable to post on here this weekend. This weekend i was actually down the docks at the “Communists against the BNP” meeting…

Anyone looking at my style of writing and slayers will see a huge difference, the fact we have both answered Emma’s questions with different answers should be a clue.

[Author]

Posts