@irish_lucy wrote:
Gaz do you even bother to research into things or just read the headline and jump on their bandwagons. Take your own advise and OPEN YOUR EYES AND STOP BEING A SHEEP.
Why was he in court in the first place?
i think it should be remembered that he didn’t win the case based on the freeman testimony but rather a section 40. He retracted his earlier contention that the judge produce his oath of office as “misconcieved”, and agreed to a settlement payment with the court.
Does anyone have a list of these so called “god given rights”. i can’t seem to find them anywhere.
Oh thanks Lucy, now maybe you can tell me if a judge is bound to show his oath?