[Fi-Fi-]

@forumhostpb wrote:

Well I guess that this shows that the Prison Service can act compassionately sometimes.

I agree with your comment about her leaving her children with some sort of nest egg or trust fund to secure their future education and so on.

i just hope that it is watertight because if not, a substantial proportion of her estate may well go to her “new” husband and not necessarily all go to her children.

Pb This will be the Home Office that has granted the release on orders from higher authority.

[Fi-Fi-]

@forumhostpb wrote:

@Fi-Fi- wrote:

@forumhostpb wrote:

In spite of the Media constantly slating her for being “thick”; “stupid”; “uneducated” and so on ….. she has been bright enough to hire Max Clifford to represent her with the Media and to ensure that she stays in the full glare of publicity as long as possible.

Seems like a pretty clever thing to do eh? At least she will get loads of money out of it all so she can fulfil her ‘dream’ of having her children privately educated. apparently she has set up Trusts for them already to cover this in the event that she dies soon.

PB
More likely Max Clifford who is top of the rat pack is making a tidy sum himself out of this . Hes already made money out of himself having been through the trama of having prostrate cancer – did anyone see him being filmed during his treatment.-NO

What Pete says is very true Fi-Fi. Max Clifford is an expert at getting his client’s “stories” into the Media – usually the tabloids – and he earns a very tidy sum out of it as well. But to do this there has to be an ‘interest’ from the readers.

I recall seeing a documentary on him a while ago and I think he takes somwhere around 25% of the sums paid for these stories.

However, he appears to deal in the more salacious stories as these appeal to the ‘red

tops’ and attract the highest fees.

I agree with you Clifford is very good at getting peoples stories into the papers and the majority of stories are salacious but that is Clifford.
I have read one article about him over this were he has stated that if she decides to be filmed right up to her death then he will have no part in that – his wife died of cancer some 6 years ago so he has first hand at seeing someone die of this dreadful disease.

[Fi-Fi-]

@forumhostpb wrote:

In spite of the Media constantly slating her for being “thick”; “stupid”; “uneducated” and so on ….. she has been bright enough to hire Max Clifford to represent her with the Media and to ensure that she stays in the full glare of publicity as long as possible.

Seems like a pretty clever thing to do eh? At least she will get loads of money out of it all so she can fulfil her ‘dream’ of having her children privately educated. apparently she has set up Trusts for them already to cover this in the event that she dies soon.

PB
More likely Max Clifford who is top of the rat pack is making a tidy sum himself out of this . Hes already made money out of himself having been through the trama of having prostrate cancer – did anyone see him being filmedd during his treatment.-NO

[Fi-Fi-]

But apart from making the Yorkshire Police look like fools (which isn’t too difficult to achieve) he didn’t do anything out of the ordinary for a convicted murderer. Loads of people commit murder; get a life sentence; and are released in 12 years or less.

PB – he didnt make the Yorkshire Police look like fools it was the system at that particular time – it was before technology was so advanced as it is now. Back in those days it was a card index system. However it did highlight a major flaw and in the following years and with advanced technology a new system was introduced.

[Fi-Fi-]

Sir Actor
Would also advise not to patronise on the posts [-X

[Fi-Fi-]

How do we know that Sharia law isnt
practised in certain quarters this country already?

[Fi-Fi-]

Im a fan of Derby County

[Fi-Fi-]

Happy Valentines day to you Thistle

Fi- Fi- x

[Fi-Fi-]

I joined jc last may. I misss Alias

[Author]

Posts