FEKRARAMAR

It’s what happens when they have unprotected sex.

Contraceptives and abortions exist.

The upper bounds are exclusive, not inclusive.

15 years, 364 days is much harder to read.

You aren’t going to stop them from having sex.

As far as I can tell people in this thread are deliberately misinterpreting the law as a justification for their view that sex with a child 14-16 is acceptable.

That being said, legality and morality are not the same thing. And I don’t believe that is acceptable.

My personal view, which I haven’t yet stated on this thread is that :

A 14…[Read more]

I believe in capital punishment for serial killers, and people who have murdered, raped, or seriously harmed a child. Provided there is significant enough evidence that leaves no reasonable doubt of their danger to society.

It was a rebutal to when Ge said that European countries with a lower age of consent have a lower reported crime rate than the UK, which has a higher age of consent.

I am a mother

If was a rebutal to when Ge said that European countries with a lower age of consent have a lower reported crime rate than the UK, which has a higher age of consent.

I am a mother

If was a response to what Ge said previously about comparing crime rates between the UK and European countries that have a lower age of consent.

I am a mother

This thread is about punishment for crimes that you might commit in the future.

That was a joke, that I believe I made in PM

This thread is about punishment for crimes that you might commit in the future.

That was a joke

Because you aren’t looking at the bigger picture.

Once you give the state power to punish people for crimes that have not happened, then that power will be applied to all crimes.

Build more prisons, re-instate capital punishment.

I have a PhD in cryptography.

English isn’t my first language.

Even if it was, I don’t see how my spelling…[Read more]

I made no such statement.

Ironic

I made no such claim.

Ironic

If you don’t want to be intellectually honest, then there is no point continuing this discussion.

I directly quoted the law as written in UK legislation, and proviced links to the original source material.

It is clear to any outside obsever that I am correct, with even the most basic investigation into the material I have posted.

You have no…[Read more]

The law can vary quite considerably, it isn’t even a crime in some countries.

You refused to say it was bad, and are still refusing to.

What other conclusion can I draw from that behaviour?

I was complaining about the law concerning rape.

We are now dicussing the law concerning statutory rape, which is a different crime.

I don’t think you are debating in good faith.

I was complaining about the law concerning rape.

We are now dicussing the law concerning statutory rape, which is a different crime.

I don’t think you are debating in good faith.

They should both be executed.

The legal documents are the legal documents, they speak for themselves

Child rapists are a type of paedophile who should be executed, given significantly strong evidence.