FEKRARAMAR

I don’t remember there being a F4.

The guides refuse to read the chat history, so this is the only way to report things.

They only see what they want to see.

They are all equally as bad.

Basic investigation would show that weyman isn’t new.

Just did a brief scroll thought the chat history in F1 and F3, I didn’t see any names that I didn’t recognise.

Weird.

You aren’t adressing the issue, which is the double standards.

If some people are abused, sudden and huge changes have to be made and a whole class of users has to be banned even the ones that are innocent. If other people are abused then they are called a drama queen and need to grow up.

I don’t know why I have to keep repeating this, but…[Read more]

I would like to document another unprofessional exchange with a chat guide.

Context (not captured):

When I logged into the room the conversation was about insurance on bank accounts being covered up to £75,000. I mentioned that it isn’t a good idea to keep that much money in a bank account and it would be better to invest it.

LE responded that…[Read more]

Firstly this is a poll, not a vote. There is no winner or loser. Sampling board user’s opinion of the chat room is a flaw in the methodology, but perhaps this isn’t important.

I’m applying a variation of Paul Samuelson’s stong axiom of revealed preference.

I thought that it was self explanatory, but the general idea is that a stated preference…[Read more]

I didn’t do that intentionally, direct your complaints at Martin.

And yet you refuse to ban people who post homophobic abuse.

This is example of the difference between stated and revealed preference.

People will state that they prefer the chat without guests because it’s the current status quo.

However their revealed preference is that they in fact prefer guests, this is proven by the following:

1. When the members only room was opened nobody used it
2. When guests were…

[Read more]

So … wheres the ban?

I was told that preventing vile and hateful abuse was this sites #1 priority.

You need to unban them first.

But what is the motivation behind this post?

I guess chat usage must be dropping off, I wonder whyever that could be.

I’m finding it difficult to understand what you are trying to say here.

I do not have any loyalty to JC, why would I?

Why do you have loyalty to it?

Could we not have this argument in this thread please?

There are plenty of others for that.

Admitedly I didn’t articulate that very well, my girlfriend is a lesbian.

Most of the “lesbians” that I know identify as that due to past experiences with abusive male partners, and as a result have a range of pyschological problems associated with that, which can make them difficult to deal with.

Because there wasn’t any.

If you had enganged with the conversation respectfully I would have explained it to you, But this is clearly a lie because I did explain it, as is shown in my screenshots.

It was clearly hostile, with the intent to offend me.

Apparently massive changes had to be made to the site when certain people were abused by…[Read more]

Additional note:

After the last screenshot I attempted to explain the reference that was made but NS claimed that she couldn’t see the message despite clearly reading the chatroom at the time (it was made 30 seconds before her next post).

Yeah, you can’t really afford to lose a user per day when you have about 6 users.

Monday : DivineIntervention

Tuesday : Guru

Wednesday : Draculina

Thursday : ???

Friday : ???