[Drivel]

@emmalush wrote:

If you want to control the worlds economic stability, and stop islam taking over the belief system, then you need a base in which to build from.

Take the Italians, they would be a major enemy of the rest of the west if we hadnt organised a percentage of the mafias wealth earnings.

There in order…

What the feck is Emma on about now !!!!!!!!!!!

[Drivel]

@bat wrote:

@American Woman wrote:

Ok, I’ll just call a spade a spade here. The magazine published the picture n the cover to grasp the people’s attention in order to sell the magazine in order to make the profit. I highly doubt the editors where thinking “what a beautiful picture of a mother giving nourishment to her child”. I’m not at all saying that I disagree with these types of pictures of breastfeeding, but I don’t think it has to be on the front cover and exploited for profit. Just as women have the right to nurse in public, individuals also have the right to disagree with it and maybe it shouldn’t be thrown in their face. I’m an adult and the picture does not offend me in the least. But, some parents don’t want their children seeing that image and that should also be respected. Therefore I think the picture should have been placed on the inside of the magazine. I highly agree with breastfeeding. It’s the best form of nutrition you can give your child. I do think that discretion is key though. Women were blessed with breasts to feed their offspring. But when not used for their main purpose, breasts are used for sexual arousal. Some people just can’t separate the two points. Breastfeeding is also an intimate bonding time with your child, which is why I think just tossing a nursery blanket over feeding time is appropriate.

AW I also dont want to walk into my local newsagents every day and see the Daily Sport, with gross images, and they ARE gross, of women with everything spread so wide you can see what they had for breakfast. No not everyone wants to see a picture of a woman breasfeeding her child on a magazine, but in all honesty, which is the worse of the two? As for children seeing that image.. I have no problem atall with either of my children seeing a picture of a mother breastfeeding her child. Thats how mine were fed… if your going to start saying cover it up, it makes it into something dirty, to be ashamed of, and it,s not. FFS someone please tell me, I did ask before, what century are we living in, when a photo of a mother breastfeeding her child is deemed offensive? I despair at this world sometimes I really do.

I’m just trying to keep the topic going with an alternative viewpoint !

If as you say babies are demanding in the first few weeks – why take them out shopping etc then ?>??

As for life and death – I’m sure the baby would survive until you found a feeding room , or got back home
No ones saying its dirty or shameful but a lot of people are uncomfortable with having breasts thrust into their faces – personally I’m not !

And just WHO eats hairy kebabs for breakfast !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Drivel]

We have a few Military bases around the world ourselves too Bass .

I can’t see what harm any of it does . Surely it makes sense for our biggest allies to have bases here ?

[Drivel]

Columbo ??

[Drivel]

You miss my point Mary

What could be more stressful than breast feeding your baby in the middle of a crowded marked or shop with people gawping

Surely its better if there were adequate private feeding facilities

As for eating out a small box – apart from the obvious sexual innuendo – which i would never repeat – my bait box is exactly 9 inches by 6 inches

[Drivel]

@james Belfast wrote:

yeah yeah Herman. On reflection tho, I have been a bit harsh with Gerrard, I know he is Liverpool through and through and I shouldn’t knock him too much. He IS a great player and God knows what was going through his head last year. I am glad he seems to have got it all sorted and I hope we have yet to see the best of him. Maybe one day he WILL be the best player in the World.

PML what did I start here – those scousers sure don’t like anyone to doubt their heroes

Gerrard is a good player – I still think he is over-rated
He’s no way the best player in the world – I doubt whether he is the best player on Merseyside !!

A great midfielder – should be able to dictate the game and the pace of the game Gerrard isn’t involved enough for that – he is great in short spells – but then disappears

[Drivel]

@becky wrote:

@drivel wrote:

having a pee , is the most natural thing in the world too – but you don’t lowp your d ick out , or drop your sloggis in the middle of tesco’s car park and have a pee – unless you are a geordie of course !!!

How can you even say the 2 things in the same sentance. Feeding EATING is life or death, sometimes you dont even know a woman is feeding it can be done so discreetly. Its a big fuss over nothing. What about labour programmes on in the afternoon showing EVERYTHING are they wrong to show nature??

It doesn’t bother me in the slightest Becky if a lady want’s to get her breasts out in public – but why all the fuss about it
Why get them out to prove the point that this is 2006 and yes its pc

Surely its better to go somewhere private – most supermarkets have feeding rooms now – and do it there

All this new age pc – I’m a modern woman – I can get my tits out anywhere I want to feed my baby – is just a bit ott – methinks

[Drivel]

@dee wrote:

I’ll ‘bare’ this post in mind when I’m on the beach in 8 weeks time :lol: 8)

I’m on the beach every single day of the year witht he dogs . We have 3 miles of lovely sand and dunes here – yet even on the hottest days – such as the last 2 weeks – the beach looks deserted

And folks spend £1,000’s to go sit on some foreign Shingle !!!!!

[Drivel]

I can’t honestly understand how such normal intelligent posters watch such contrived shyte !!!!!!

[Drivel]

having a pee , is the most natural thing in the world too – but you don’t lowp your d ick out , or drop your sloggis in the middle of tesco’s car park and have a pee – unless you are a geordie of course !!!

[Author]

Posts