Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
7 August, 2006 at 8:09 am #233442
@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
@Magoo wrote:
Pikey… You have stated that you agree that hijacking terrorists should be allowed to settle and work in our country
Trapps/Geoff/Magoo.
Can you please point me to your source of information, which entitles you to lable/libel people, who are fleeing for their lives as ; “hijacking terrorists”?
]
It’s nice to see Pikey , Magoo and Owen have reconciled their differences and getting on so well together
I’d like to ask the hijack sympathisers – “how far would you let the hijackers go before you would condemn them ?” Obviously it’s now okay to hijack a plane ; would it be okay to kill or wound a British citizen in the plight to escape ?
7 August, 2006 at 7:43 am #233623And I honestly believed that the fences around churches and graveyards were to keep the Zombies IN
Thank you for such an enightening thread !
7 August, 2006 at 7:32 am #233944@abitofmary_j wrote:
would you Adam n Eve it….. ole Saint Mirren are top of the league… great result for yesterday, especially winning their first game away….. and their second the at home to Motherwell…. and finally the Flag could get raised…. imagine the winners of 1st div league not gettin their first game at home eh….!!!
ole Argyll will be a happy buck…
St Mirren , Motherwell ??????????????
Hockey teams ??? Baseball ????
Can someone help me here ??
4 August, 2006 at 3:21 pm #41996Flying Doctor
Charlie Drake
4 August, 2006 at 1:21 pm #233395Hate to say it but I have to agree with Magoo too !!!!!!
4 August, 2006 at 12:25 pm #233394@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
The Boeing 727 was hijacked on an internal flight in Afghanistan in February 2000.
The men were convicted in December 2001, but their convictions were quashed in 2003 by the Appeal Court which found they were acting under duress.
In a statement in May, the nine asylum seekers said they were desperate to be allowed to work and contribute to UK society.
They also apologised to passengers on the flight they hijacked, for the fear they had caused.
Got to agree with Emma on this one – these guys shouldn’t even have been considered for asylum in this country
4 August, 2006 at 10:26 am #232956@becky wrote:
Actually in Broard Street in Birmingham ( a row of nightclubs) has built some outdoor urinals so men dont pee in the street now these can be seen by everyone in the street so whats your views on this? I will go get a link for you.
I find that very “French” Becky
But there again what can you expect from Birmingham – we are much more civilised in Geordieland !!!
4 August, 2006 at 10:25 am #232955@wilma wrote:
Women who breast feed could, remain at home chained to a sink!!!
However in this enlightened day and age it is not only bottle fed babies who get taken out by their mothers :lol:Unfortunately babies tend to be fed on demand….. 4hr between feeds..worthwhile aiming for… but babies being babies tend to ignore this clockwatching stuff and omg… cry when they are hungry.
Therefore……If the woman has dared to go out with her children :shock: and the baby wants fed……
Em of course men don’t pee in the streets etc but they can pee in any toilet or behind any tree!!
A woman may choose to feed her baby in the nearest loo… but have you seen some of the public loos…surreptitiously lurking behind a tree trying to feed a baby is not the best option either, juggling shopping, toddler, baby and pushchair etc behind a tree is most likely multi tasking taken too far
The other alternative is just tell the baby to wait untill mummy gets home!!!!! Note that not all mothers have the luxury of a car..I certainly didn’t when my children were small.
However using common sense…which is what women do best anyway :lol:
They find a quiet wee spot (again note no trees) and discreetly feed the baby. Certainly better for the surrounding environment than a baby screaming until mum gets home just to ensure that the shocked prudes and the mad sex maniacs are not either offended or aroused!!! :roll: :roll: :roll:That’s a very sensible and well constructed reply – no less than I expecte from Wilmers
And that’s all I was meaning – find a nice quiet place and do the business discreetly – the others seem to be advocating immediate strips as soon as the baby opens it’s mouth !!!
4 August, 2006 at 9:10 am #232952@sweetasbaileez wrote:
@drivel wrote:
@becky wrote:
@drivel wrote:
having a pee , is the most natural thing in the world too – but you don’t lowp your d ick out , or drop your sloggis in the middle of tesco’s car park and have a pee – unless you are a geordie of course !!!
How can you even say the 2 things in the same sentance. Feeding EATING is life or death, sometimes you dont even know a woman is feeding it can be done so discreetly. Its a big fuss over nothing. What about labour programmes on in the afternoon showing EVERYTHING are they wrong to show nature??
It doesn’t bother me in the slightest Becky if a lady want’s to get her breasts out in public – but why all the fuss about it
Why get them out to prove the point that this is 2006 and yes its pcSurely its better to go somewhere private – most supermarkets have feeding rooms now – and do it there
All this new age pc – I’m a modern woman – I can get my tits out anywhere I want to feed my baby – is just a bit ott – methinks
i fail to see what your comments have to do with a magazine cover ??? am i missing something ?? unless you mean the woman being photographed ?? well im sure that it would have been taken in a private photography room, (which was then downloaded onto the world wide web so narrow minded, sexually frustrated deviant bafoons could use its ‘potentially’ peadophillic content as a way to relieve their desires.)
or better still maybe it was used as a magazine shoot to inform people of the fact that breast feeding is not only good for the well being of the said infant, it is also beneficial emotionally and financially to all in question. breast feeding is an essential part of nature and to use such an inane context as ‘weeing in the street’ astounds me drivel, i really expected a more mature and well worded argument for your opinion on this matter !!! :roll:
I didn’t mentione weeing in the street !! – I just said peeing was natural too – yet we do it in private
All i’m saying is – what’s the hurry – find a feeding place and feed the baby – or go to your car – or go home
It doesn’t bother me in the slightest – the picture is obviously modelled -as most of you ladies have saggy tits anyway
I just can’t understand why you feel the need to breastfeed in public3 August, 2006 at 3:21 pm #233094Been looking at the Sky Sports preview for season – they have Derby 10th Coventry 11th
Sunderland 3rd Brum 2nd WBA Top
Should be an interesting season with so many Championship supporters in the Boards
-
AuthorPosts