chantel89

I don’t , I use the balance of probability with the limited information at my disposal. I would suggest my approximation of what happens after death bears a closer resemblance to truth than a book of fiction based on a middle aged paedophile and his 9 year old wife but who knows.

I’ve been reincarnated 😈

Whether Jesus existed is irrelevant , what is relevant is whether he was ” the son of God”. Most historians accept there probably was a figure existing round this time called Jesus who was most likely a travelling trickster elevated to divine/holy status perpetuating a myth he was the son of “God”

because if the bible is to be believed, God is a narcissist megalomaniac  demanding all people believe in him or burn in hell. That strikes me as a being which demands adulation or the consequences could be a holiday down south where the climate gets rather warm.

Of course the real question is whether God exists, it’s like saying ” The real question is not if the tooth fairy exists but what would be gained by him sitting on your pillow holding a tooth”. There is the balance of probability showing no God so it’s existence is the main issue

It could have been hugs and winks tbf who has a long flowing beard apparently

Are you sure it wasn’t the holy spirit rather than the holy ghost which visited due to large quantities of cider consumed?

If science starts off from a basis of doubt, what would you say something derived from a book written 2000 years ago talking about myth used as a template for ” religion” starts off from then? Can you give an example of how science and religion are compatible, or is it a case of a search for knowledge exposes all known religions for the…[Read more]

If a human being wrote a book, subsequently labelled it a “religion” with numerous aspects of it proven to be false using factual evidence derived from science, why would you entertain the notion that the rest was correct or even bother discussing such a book of mythology? You say the discussions in the Gospels are not clear cut by Dawkins…[Read more]

Nothing that we currently know of can prove or disprove the hypothesis of a ” creator” but science can and continually does contradict and discredit all mainstream religions rendering them unfit for purpose. A simple example is evolution which is commonly accepted rather than some laughably constructed scenario of Adam and Eve in the garden of…[Read more]

If preaching to a child led to that child committing terrorist activities for eg as a consequence of  indoctrinated mythology subsequently leading to death or life long imprisonment, what you define it as?

The crusades were hundreds of years ago and bear no relevance  to Christianity in the 21st century. You may as well start talking about people getting leeches put on their bodies if they were going to an NHS hospital if you keep bringing up past transgressions centuries ago as a valid argument for persecuting a faith of today. Islam is another…[Read more]

I hate to be the bearer of bad news but when you’re dead, you’re dead. The notion that all living creatures have a soul and paradise awaits with worms, flies, rats and bats fluttering around as relatives peer through the haze saying welcome to heaven is too ridiculous to merit a discussion.

I remember it well but it was nearly 20 years ago, these days we have a billionaire company funding our players at 15 million each for the likes of costa and Neves who captained porto who barely makes our subs bench. We have played Villa this season already and tore them apart

only if you want to go bust

wolves will have won the league by easter lol

There is only one team that has stopped city scoring this season.. the mighty gold and black army