Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
and by the way jen jen, pointing out that you mentioned those things, wasn’t a critisism!!
Ok, before we go getting carried away here, I wasn’t attacking your children, just pointing out that they too, or you do anyway, receive child benefit, and that she is as entitled as anyone else!
I don’t recall mentioning anything about the way she keeps her house either, and if you care to check I think you’ll find it was jen jen who made that point. Jen jen also pointed out, that this woman had said that she had saved all year to spend the money she had on her children for christmas. Isn’t that what most families do then?
Irresponsible? ,,,,,,,,, ok well this is the second and the last time I shall point out that I did say in my original post, maybe you’d like to check, I believe it was along the lines of ”while it may seem a little irresponsible”!!!
I’m glad to see that you quite rightly pointed out that we are!! all entitled to an opinion, because that means me as well as you. It didn’t stop you from attacking me though, and I don’t believe I attacked you in any way Sarah, merely voiced (or typed if pple want to be pedantic !!) my own opinion.
You seem to have maybe missed the part where I did actually say Sarah, that ‘while it may have been a little irresponsible” etc etc.,
As for the taxpayers paying her working family tax credits and child allowance, isn’t it those same taxpayers who also pay your childrens?
As for ‘right on cue’ :roll: I merely happened to say that I thought it was something PB may say. Given that he has, doesn’t mean I asked him to, maybe you think otherwise :roll:
I think as PB might say, this has been maybe a little whipped up by the ‘Sun’ newspaper.
Ok, while it may be a little irresponsible to have that many kids, it also says that the father of these children does work, which in itself is more than can be said for some. It says that the benefits they receive are working family tax credits and family allowance, which actually, every working family with children receive, so if they’re the only benefits they are receiving, then they’re not receiving anything they’re not entitled to are they.
It doesn’t say anything about them receiving any other benefits so it’s another one of those I think where theres more to it than first thought.
Iv’e found this whole thing really interesting, and believe me for JC that does make a change : ),,,,,,,,ok so i’m a cynic :wink:
Iv’e used the same products on my skin for years, just baby lotion, thats it!,,,as for make up, I use very little make up anyway. I do try to buy the products that say they’re not tested on animals, but at the end of the day, who really knows.
As for the toxins,,,,,,,,in recent months my GP has tried a whole host of prescription drugs to help the problem I have. The problem itself is Cervical Spondylitis, which can cause really quite severe pain. I have it seems, chronic degeneration of vertebrae 3 4 and 5 which affects my neck and shoulders, often even the movement of my head to look to one side or the other can cause very painful spasms. We started with Co-codamol, then Diclofenac, Ibuprofen, Tramacet, and Tramadol. The only thing any of these products did was to cause problems with my stomach. I reached a point where I was unable to eat anything and keep it down. I think I was producing enough acid for england!! I stopped
taking any prescription drugs, except I now take Ranitidine, which strictly speaking isn’t prescribed drugs, you can buy it over the counter. It has helped in calming down my stomach and i’m now able to eat without throwing up shortly afterwards. I’m managing the pain now with just a tens machine. I have to see a pain management consultant in january, which i’m frankly not really looking forward to. I’m concerned that there ae going to be arguments because it’ll be no doubt, a case of oh well we’ll try this, and it’ll be more medication. After what the last lot of medication did to my system, iv’e no wish to go there again!!In 2002 I underwent 6 months of chemotherapy. Strong, powerful, highly toxic drugs, injected straight into a vein!! Always struck me as really odd (ok I am blond : ) ) that had these drugs been injested as you would a tablet, they would have killed me stone dead!!! The point is though, that these highly toxic drugs, while they made me quite sick for a couple of days, they didn’t do half as much damage to my system, as the so called ‘safe’ prescription drugs.
You could always cut n paste it and send it to Martin, with the time and date, he may be able to trace it, that was what I did
Congratulations on your big day Angellllllll
Lots of love and hugs and kisses
Carol xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It’ll only change Sarah,,,,,,,when one of our oh so wonderful politicians finds the balls to make significant changes to the law to deal with the scumbags who carry out such henious crimes. Hasn’t been one so far, and I hold out no hope of there being one in the forseeable future :twisted:
That,,,,,,,,,,,,,and the scrapping of the ”Human Rights” law, which as I said in another post, these perpetrators suddenly discover also, applies to them :roll: Seemingly more so, than any victims of their violence :roll:
She’ll survive. She has freinds and family who love her dearly, and were there to make sure she does. I truly hope that this woman and her children have that same support.
Oh I know!! and I agree,,,,,don’t get me wrong, i’m not defending the scumbags, just pointing out how they all seem to suddenly remember their ‘human rights’ when anyone should have the audacity to question their actions.
Iv’e spent the past few days Sarah, propping up a very good freind. Her psycho husband thought it a really great idea to try to push her already ailing heart to an attack that would perhaps have killed her! The police can do nothing, he admitted that what he did was all a wind up to upset her, the only thing they can and are going to do, is charge him with wasting police time.
She in the meantime, is safe and well, and will remain so until an injuction is in place (tomorrow) stopping the psycho from coming near her!!
The law it seems, sadly, is on the side in the main, of the perpetrator :roll:
