Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
20 December, 2009 at 1:03 pm #426366
Have to agree with Mims Pete, while people can understand the anger you feel, I can! she’s right, it doesn’t solve anything, stronger and harder punishments need to be set in place. Until theres a politician with the balls to try to start changes then nothing is going to happen, and children like this little one, and baby Peter and going to continue suffering.
I know too, that your going to say that it does solve this issue, that he’d be as dead as the child he killed, but as Mims said, what about when these vigilantes get the wrong person? it happens!
What I truly can’t understand is that when these people are put on trial, and found guilty and sent to prison, the first and very next thing they’re breifs do, is to launch an appeal. It was my understanding, that by going to prison you lost any rights you may have you lose the right to vote don’t you?,,,,,,why are they given so many ”rights”!! Who speaks for the ‘rights’ of these children? where is their justice!
20 December, 2009 at 12:53 pm #426364My money’s also on this scumbag facing just manslaughter charges, there are no witnesses and he’s denying having had anything to do with her injuries or her death. The police are no doubt going to say, again!!, not enough evidence, as they did with the Baby P case, they couldn’t prove which one of them struck the killer blow and they were charged with manslaughter. 12 years maybe? of which he’ll serve 6 or 7, then be given a new identity and left to get on with the rest of his life, and maybe perhaps go on to do the same to someone elses child.
While I do feel some sympathy with the family, you have to ask yourself, why was this child known to social services, and were there signs that should have been looked out for, I spose they’re the only ones have to live with those now un-answerable questions.
I’m with eve on this one, 6′ x 6′ stone cell and locked up 23 hrs a day, added to which, no computers, no tv, no priveleges, nothing but time, time to think, and time to realise that this is their lot, for the rest of their natural lives. ](*,) can already hear the cries of ‘inhumane’ from the human rights brigade eh :roll:
12 December, 2009 at 10:46 am #425780@thistle-fem-1964 wrote:
THIS WILL BE EASY PICK THE SANTA U THINK REPRESENTS JC MALE THE ONES WITH THE MOST VOTES WILL BE TAGGED WITH THAT CHATTERS NAME (INCLUDES GUIDES AND HOSTS)
ON SUNDAY NIGHT WILL CHECK HOW MANY VOTES EACH GOT AND TAG THEM .
DONT GET EXCITED AND REMEMBER IN GROUP PICTURES BACK ROW LEFT TO RIGHT HAVE FUN GIRLS^^^^^ Definately PB :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :-
1 December, 2009 at 12:59 pm #425158@minim wrote:
My workmates and I went out at the weekend and I have chosen the most adorable little frock for my xmas party. And, bear in mind i don’t do frocks!
cool innit!
What are you all wearing for yours?
Gorgeous mims, it’ll look fab :wink:
27 November, 2009 at 11:20 pm #424862RSPCA inspector Andrew Kirby, who is investigating the incident, said: “We have tracked down the sheep’s owner but we can’t return it to its flock for six days because of restrictions on the movement of livestock.
^^^ :shock: thats a joke right? :-s
27 November, 2009 at 11:53 am #424692The benefits she receives shouldn’t come into it. She receives child allowance and they also get working family tax credits, which as a low income family, they’re entitled to. My whole point was that at least the father of these children does work, and isn’t one of those seen on the Jeremy Kyle show bleating about how he can’t possibly work with all these children, has a bad back etc etc etc.,
These children clearly arn’t neglected or mistreated, there are plenty who are, and maybe the ‘Sun’ would be better employed hurling those kind of stories into the limelight instead of picking on a family just to sell newspapers, because basically thats what it’s about, sensationalising stories and selling newspapers.
Iv’e seen on other sites over the last few days, people openly attacking this woman, saying she should have her benefits stopped :roll: also critisising her on her choice of names for her offspring, although what her choice of names has to do with anything or anyone else for that matter! is totally beyond me!! Maybe some people have nothing better to do and maybe they’d be better employed spending a little more money on a newspaper instead of a comic like the ‘Sun’ :evil:
25 November, 2009 at 6:08 pm #421946@susieq wrote:
my son’s attitude and behaviour whenever he has spent time with his sperm donor :roll:
Been there, done that one, and best ignored if you can :evil:
25 November, 2009 at 11:33 am #421937In fairness, the receptionists at my surgery are lovely, all but one man who’s a little far up his own ar*e :-k hmmmm reminds me of someone else, i’m sure it’ll come to me :-
25 November, 2009 at 11:08 am #421934Doctors :twisted:
Health professionals in general :twisted: who should perhaps spend some time understanding the word ‘professional’ before claiming to be so :twisted:
24 November, 2009 at 9:55 pm #424688 -
AuthorPosts