Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@gazlan wrote:
Not having met the man, i cant say…..his story telling appears to be popular, i myself tend to read factual material
as im sure you have noticed…..take the talmud for instance, theres death, blood, people with fantastic abilities, not to mention the miraculous events… the story of a people persecuted through the times, uplifted by the almighty and and singled out to put right the wrongs of the goyim..
Its all there….look…
“A Jew should and must make a false oath when the goyim asks if our books contain anything against them.” -Szaaloth-Utszabot,
Yep….its the talmud for me….death, destruction, fear and terror like you never seen before… i just cant put it down….
Should i like this man Grisham, why should i like him in particular ?A lot of it sounds farmilar Gaz. The same as the rest. To be fair the Jews dont seem to force their religion on you like the Muslims and Christians do. They seem to be happy just practising it them to themselves.
@gazlan wrote:
@Bad Manners wrote:
Speak for yourself Pete. Im interested in hearing more of the talmud. :^o
Of course, thats why its been so popular…. Maybe any budding jews out there may find some interesting points to discuss…. it does seem to have attracted the usual trolls but, theres a chance a sincere faithful person might stray here….ooh…is that the time… :P
It’s very heavy leisure reading Gaz. You sure you dont like John Grisham?
Speak for yourself Pete. Im interested in hearing more of the talmud. :^o
@gazlan wrote:
Yeh…..i guessed that
You guessed what? That I like John Grisham or that the Old Testament bored me out of my tits?
Well Gaz, I prefer a John Grisham. I have actually tried to read the Old Testament before but It bored me very quickly. I almost got to the end of it, but I was totally bored out of my tits by that time.
Google has apologised after its Street View photo mapping service showed a frontal view of a naked child on a family day out.
Images of the blond boy, aged four or five, went live on Thursday in an update for the service.
They pictured him with his trousers down after going to the toilet on Wimbledon Common, South-West London.
The photos, showing the child’s mother or nanny helping him dress and a man looking on, have sparked fears that paedophiles will have a new way to search for photos or targets online.
Google had blurred the child’s face but not the registration plate of the family’s car, making it possible to trace their address.
The photos were removed soon after Google was alerted yesterday.
But they are further ammunition for critics of Street View, branded a ‘burglar’s charter’ when it launched last year.
The service caused controversy then with images of a naked toddler and people leaving sex shops or vomiting in public.
Privacy campaigners slammed Google yesterday. Alex Deane, of Big Brother Watch, said: ‘Where there’s one example like this, there will be many others.’
A Google spokesman said: ‘We apologise for any inadvertent concern this may have caused.’
He said there were online tools so users could report inappropriate images immediately.
Do you think it’s possibly her own fault for standing in front of a bulldozer? :?
What Im saying is that the invisible being over that way dosent like stem cell research, or gay sex, or numerous other things. It’s never been proven that the invisble being ever has or ever will exist though.
@pete wrote:
I have no doubt science is working on cloning humans and all sorts of unethical practises, should it be allowed to do that, of course religion should be allowed to ask questions, religion cant impose anything, man might as a power trip, and use religion as the excuse, but religion cant stop me doing anything.
Religion is belief in something that’s never been proven all. Science has proven itself time and time again. Why should we give religion any repect at all?
@pete wrote:
I dont think religion held science back necessarily, technical expertise certainly did. The chinese who invented just about everything suddenly didnt because they didnt have glass and what they did have reacted with stuff, “western” scientists had glass which is very unreactive and so the chinese were held back. Some scientists put forward theories which possibly just weren’t questioned enough so science was held back as most took the theories as gospel till some brave soul debunked them. Religious scholars certainly ask questions. I dont think either side can simply be dismissed is my point i guess
I dunno. Id say it held us back possibly 200 years in advancement Pete at the very least. Now we move on to more modern scientific stuff. Stem cells, and religion is imposing it’s views on everyone else. Should it be allowed to do it?
as im sure you have noticed…..take the talmud for instance, theres death, blood, people with fantastic abilities, not to mention the miraculous events… the story of a people persecuted through the times, uplifted by the almighty and and singled out to put right the wrongs of the goyim..