Bad Manners

@will wrote:

how cum u and all the rest of PATS minions constantly moan or b1tch about JC on ur boards then? of the few occasions ive been on.. it’s JC this JC that.. or if it aint about JC it’s Take Chat or one of it’s members.. i make no lie about readin Pat’s boards,,,, just as im sure she and others read JC boards.. only i’m not ashamed to…

[Read more]

I’ll post where I like Egg Yolk. This aint your site after all. Go do another dramatic leaving post.
:lol: :wink:

Wrong again Will. :roll: Show me anywhere I’ve bitc.hed about JC?
A Message Boards only as good as It’s posters and JC’s failing might be having you and Grandpa Pete as a Dumb and Dumber double act.

Coffin Dodger

@Pete wrote:

Batty Boy :roll:

Tosser :roll:

@Pete wrote:

Wanker :roll:

Moron :roll:

Drama Queen :roll:

Are you still scouring through these threads from 2005 Will? :roll:

@Pete wrote:

@Bad Manners wrote:

Did you look through all the threads from 2005 until you came across that? :roll:

Pete, do you understand ironic humour? I’ll give you a lesson later. Gotta have my Tea now.

Wonder whatever happened to Adeboje? :-k

Did you look through all the threads from 2005 until you came across that? :roll:

Yeah, yeah Kate. :roll:

@ForumHostPB wrote:

Cas is absolutely correct in her view. Bottom line is that quality is what counts – not quantity.

People often make the mistake of judging a message board by the number of contributors rather than by the content that they contribute. (If only I had £1 for every time the ‘internet gurus’ predicted the demise of…

[Read more]

Ya boring me now Pete. :roll:

@Pete wrote:

And i didnt when i said it now i do… so bite me.. you’re boring me .. go backstab or hunt down Kate im not about to enter a battle of wits with someone who has no weapons

Course not. You’re above that type of silly bickering. :^o :^o :^o

@Pete wrote:

Not always innocent no.. again i didnt get banned did I and i’ll use as many msg boards as i want, wasnt that your message.
Oh btw hello Kate (wheres the yawn emoticon when you need one)

I never said I didnt use more than 1. You did. :^o :^o :^o

@Pete wrote:

BM… fuck off …hows that for a skirmish… i replied and i’ll always defend the right to reply i didnt seek out their posts now crawl back to Pats boards and post my name again why dont ya =;

You were the totally innocent party of course. Were those bullies picking on you? :wink:

When did I mention your name at Pats? Ah…[Read more]

@Pete wrote:

@Chocolate wrote:

Yes there is no doubt in my mind what so ever that I am indeed Kate BM :lol: :roll:

PB I agree to a point, some posters did get carried away with the positng of other posters personal info, etc, etc….however, alot of the posters banned didnt do that, alot of the posters banned kept the place alive at least…I…

[Read more]

Wrote Peanut by mistake. ](*,) 8-[

Should have read Chocolate, Tinkerbell and Fi Fi.

Yep, the Luvvie faintheart Coup d’etat succeeded, but most of the luvvie fainthearts seem to have gone elsewhere now. :-k

Chocolate, Peanut and Tinkerbell are Kate’s characters on the thread by the way. :wink: