Boards Index General discussion Getting serious WWF supports animal testing and hunting

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 22 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #5397

    The World Wildlife Fund (also known as the Worldwide Fund for Nature, or simply WWF) has been actively pressuring government agencies in the U.S., Europe, and Canada to increase the amount of testing that they require for pesticides and other chemicals. The result of the WWF’s lobbying has been the establishment of what threaten to be the largest animal-testing programs of all time.

    And that’s not all. As one would expect of an organization founded by trophy hunters, the WWF does not oppose killing animals for sport. The WWF believes that culling (read “killing”) elephants and seals is OK, it supports the slaughter of whales by native tribes, and it refuses to speak out against steel-jaw leghold traps.

    Surprised? Please click on the link below to learn more about why PETA thinks the WWF should change its name to the Wicked Wildlife Fund.

    Click here to read more.
    http://www.wickedwildlifefund.com/test.html

    http://www.bava.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/WWF.html

    World Wildlife Fund promotes vivisection and other animal abuse

    The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) has been actively pressuring government agencies in the United States, Canada, and Europe to greatly increase the amount of testing that they require for new and existing pesticides and other chemicals. The result of the WWF’s lobbying has been the establishment of what threatens to be the largest animal-testing programs of all time.

    The WWF was the driving force in pressuring the US Congress to legislate the screening of chemicals for “endocrine (hormone) disrupting” effects and has subsequently been heavily involved in establishing the framework for the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) massive chemical-testing program now under development. As its Web site points out: “WWF invested substantial resources in the EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee,” which “agreed upon a set of tests to form the foundation for the screening and testing program.” What the WWF neglects to mention, however, is that 10 of the 15 recommended screens and tests are animal-poisoning studies, some of which kill hundreds or thousands of animals at a time. According to scientific estimates, the WWF-backed endocrine testing program will kill up to 1.2 million animals for every 1,000 chemicals tested, and with environmental organisations pressing for tens of thousands of chemicals to be retested under this program, the toll in animal suffering and death will be staggering. The WWF is also pressuring government agencies in Europe to embark on a similar animal-testing program.

    In addition to lobbying for more chemical testing, the WWF has teamed up with Procter & Gamble, S.C. Johnson, and other chemical companies to create an institute to pursue “basic research” on endocrine disruptors. On top of this, the WWF is now pushing the US Congress to pass a bill that would pour additional millions in public funds into endocrine research, much of which would likely be used to fund experiments on animals.

    Unfortunately, the “endocrine disruptor” issue is not an isolated example. The WWF has been a major force in pressuring the European Union to amend its Chemicals Policy to require companies to test and retest as many as 30,000 new and existing chemicals. The British Institute for Environmental Health estimates that this process will kill upwards of 45 million animals if the standard battery of animal-poisoning tests is used. The WWF’s US and Canadian offices are also calling for more testing of pesticides, despite the fact that more than 9,000 animals are already killed for each pesticide product on the market. The organisation has called for certain pesticides to be tested for “developmental neurotoxicity” (DNT) using a test that kills upwards of 1,300 animals each time it is conducted. This test has been heavily criticised by scientists, including the EPA’s own Scientific Advisory Panel, which concluded that “the exposure of rat foetus/pups was not shown to be equivalent to human foetus/infant during equivalent stages of brain development” and that “the current form of the DNT guideline is not a sensitive indicator of toxicity to the offspring.” In other words, WWF is calling for thousands of animals to be killed in a test that scientists admit is not relevant to humans!

    In its defence, the WWF says that “in the absence of effective, validated alternatives, WWF believes that limited animal testing is needed for the long-term protection of wildlife and people throughout the world.” However, there is nothing “limited” about the massive amount of animal testing that the WWF is endorsing. Dr. Joshua Lederberg, Nobel Laureate in Medicine, pointed out in 1981: “It is simply not possible with all the animals in the world to go through chemicals in the blind way we have at the present time, and reach credible conclusions about the hazards to human health.” Now more than 20 years later, millions of animals are still dying in agonizing chemical toxicity tests, and we are no closer to getting dangerous chemicals out of the environment. In fact, despite killing hundreds of thousands of animals in painful chemical toxicity tests, the EPA has not banned a single toxic industrial chemical in more than a decade!

    The WWF endorses the killing of wild animals, too. For information on this, and who you can complain to, please visit: http://www.wickedwildlifefund.com

    See also: The Enemy Within



    For more on Procter & Gmable – http://www.uncaged.co.uk/pg.htm

    #245369

    Vegan…the statistics are frightening..but sadly..most people will either ignore or deride them. I have already contacted Elizabeth Salter..the Head of European Toxicity..at Panda House in Surrey…to express my disgust. Frankly..it’s about time the barstards were done under the Trade Descriptions Act at the very least.

    Why is it..that to champion human rights… is to be exclaimed ‘noble’…but to champion animal rights..is to be branded…’fanatical?’ ALL living creatures deserve our protection.

    Keep spreading the word….

    #245370

    I hate people like you!

    You all moan on about AIDS and Canser ect, but test anything on animals that could save lifes and your up in arms about it.

    And you know what “Esmeralda & vergan”, I can tell you both have never been without food for more than 3 days or been so cold that you would kill your own mothers to get warm. Your just a silly girsl who parents panda to your every wim.

    Take it from me, if your cold, wet and starting to die, you will kill, eat and skin anything to stay alive.

    Why don’t both of you try working for VSO for a few years, and see a few 100 people die each day from lack of food or warmth. Then you will see the need for pesticides and other chemical, why most sain people see the need for animals testing.

    Or do you both feel we should not use pesticides ? Maybe just let companys out of testing and just bang it out there? After all, testing is not cheap!

    There some thing I can do at the weekend, I can go down to Sudan and make them use organic food aid, ok most of them will not get feed because of the cost of organic, and the fact most of it would rot or be eaten by insects in a few days without chemical pesticides.

    After all, its not like they matter is it? People in 3rd world die all the die, whats a few more?

    Has long has nice midle class girls like you are keep’t happy, let them die.

    #245371

    I agree with dead on arrival.

    I don’t agree with unnecessary tests on animals, for things such as make up and the like, but I do agree with tests on animals for research into cetain diseases.

    I did a collection once for a cancer charity and a few people wouldnt even give anything, one lady told me she wouldnt give to a charity that tested on animals…(has in the past or whatever)… but i noticed she soon had treatment for her cancer the next year when she got cancer.

    I don’t care if people want to be vegans, and if they would rather die then skin a cat or something to live in a desperate situation (should it ever happen) thats up to them… more cat for me.

    #245372

    I did say that this topic would be derided..and once again..the idiots never fail to disappoint. D.O.A…..what a remarkably ill-informed illiterate poltroon you are. I served a two year VSO placement in The Gambia in the early nineties and have probably been witness to more misery and deprivation than your poor troglodyte-self..lurking in your cave could ever contemplate. Oh..but it was flattering to be called a ‘girl’..given that I’m probably old enough to be yer mother…
    As for your good self Shinrai..the animal testing in question had buggerall to do with cancer research..but was for environmental toxicity.. this experimentation proving irrelevant..animals being tortured for nothing..all the while the WWf masquerading as promoting animal conservation.
    It’s evident D.O.A. that you are incapable of reasoned argument..so it’s doubtless a waste of time pointing out that some of us are capable of caring for BOTH human and animal life..and I find your presumptions as audacious as they are laughable. Get back to school little boy….

    #245373

    lol

    #245374

    I was shocked, then intrigued when I read this thread. Here’s the WWF response.

    Chemical companies refuse to withdraw products already on the market unless there is proof that they are causing damage. WWF argues that the only way of checking this is to carry out tests.

    WWF said: “Despite utterly inadequate safety assessments, tens of thousands of chemicals are being released into the environment. This results in the exposure of humans and wildlife to unknown risks.Of the 2,600 chemicals used in the highest volumes in the EU, 21% have no safety data.”

    Story here.

    #245375

    as mankind is guilty of destroying the environment let mankind seek for the solutions amongst its own kind..I’m sure there would be plenty of volunteers..failing that..let’s get testing on a few murderers and child-rapists. But then..even such lowlife are given rights above innocent animals :evil:

    #245376

    Maybe animal testing should be restricted to ”guilty” animals then and the ”innocent” ones can be left alone???

    #245377

    I did say that this topic would be derided..and once again..the idiots never fail to disappoint. D.O.A…..what a remarkably ill-informed illiterate poltroon you are. I served a two year VSO placement in The Gambia in the early nineties and have probably been witness to more misery and deprivation than your poor troglodyte-self..lurking in your cave could ever contemplate. Oh..but it was flattering to be called a ‘girl’..given that I’m probably old enough to be yer mother…
    As for your good self Shinrai..the animal testing in question had buggerall to do with cancer research..but was for environmental toxicity.. this experimentation proving irrelevant..animals being tortured for nothing..all the while the WWf masquerading as promoting animal conservation.
    It’s evident D.O.A. that you are incapable of reasoned argument..so it’s doubtless a waste of time pointing out that some of us are capable of caring for BOTH human and animal life..and I find your presumptions as audacious as they are laughable. Get back to school little boy….Esmeralda

    Err nope.

    Back in 1989 I was in Lebanon for 2 years for the UNHCR, then Turkiye/Iraq for 18 months working with the Kurds, Bosnia, untill 95

    Still do 6 weeks a year for UN projets each year and in Jan I took a group of 20 trainees to Angola.

    Wot did you do agian?

    I wish I had gone to Gambia, I hear they have some very nice bars and clubs. But I am usefull and not useless like you.

    After all, they only send plumbers where there needed and its always the sharp end.

    And just how old are you again?

    http://www.usaforunhcr.org/?code=P008

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 22 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!