Viewing 10 posts - 51 through 60 (of 82 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #514197

    @kent f OBE wrote:

    @panda12 wrote:

    If I wrote a letter like that where there is a glaring grammatical error in the first sentence, and which showed my lack of vocabulary by repetition of words such as allegedly and understand, I wouldn’t put it in the public domain.

    And he’s an MP?

    Was probably his bimbo secretary with legs up to her armpits that wrote that :lol:

    (yes that was a joke before anyone wants to bash me for being bimboist!) :lol:

    So what is it with you and bimbos anyway?

    :shock:

    #514198

    @momentaryloss wrote:

    . . . . So what is it with you and his bimbo secretary with legs up to her armpits?

    :shock:

    *faints . . . . . .

    #514199

    Gay rights campaigners have criticised Mr Cameron’s use of language during the interview.

    “There is no reason why he should link the current scandals with gay people or warn of an anti-gay witch-hunt,” long-standing campaigner Peter Tatchell said.

    “The current investigations concern paedophilia, not homosexuality.”

    Cameron has lost points, but Schofield – who presents “Celebrity Mr and Mrs”, “Celebrity Dancing on Ice” and “Celebrity The Cube” has fared a lot worse.

    #514200

    @wordsworth60 wrote:

    @momentaryloss wrote:

    . . . . So what is it with you and his bimbo secretary with legs up to her armpits?

    :shock:

    *faints . . . . . .

    Hands smelling salts to words :roll:

    #514201

    @momentaryloss wrote:

    @kent f OBE wrote:

    @panda12 wrote:

    If I wrote a letter like that where there is a glaring grammatical error in the first sentence, and which showed my lack of vocabulary by repetition of words such as allegedly and understand, I wouldn’t put it in the public domain.

    And he’s an MP?

    Was probably his bimbo secretary with legs up to her armpits that wrote that :lol:

    (yes that was a joke before anyone wants to bash me for being bimboist!) :lol:

    So what is it with you and bimbos anyway?

    :shock:

    I could say I was jealous but considering I have been accused of being a bimbo myself it wouldn’t make sense :lol:

    #514202

    @mrs_teapot wrote:

    @wordsworth60 wrote:

    @momentaryloss wrote:

    . . . . So what is it with you and his bimbo secretary with legs up to her armpits?

    :shock:

    *faints . . . . . .

    Hands smelling salts to words :roll:

    Thanks Mrs T, I really don’t wanna miss that . . . . .

    #514203

    @wordsworth60 wrote:

    @mrs_teapot wrote:

    @wordsworth60 wrote:

    @momentaryloss wrote:

    . . . . So what is it with you and his bimbo secretary with legs up to her armpits?

    :shock:

    *faints . . . . . .

    Hands smelling salts to words :roll:

    Thanks Mrs T, I really don’t wanna miss that . . . . .

    Hey you changed my quote!

    :lol: :lol: :lol:

    #514204

    @wordsworth60 wrote:

    @mrs_teapot wrote:

    @wordsworth60 wrote:

    @momentaryloss wrote:

    . . . . So what is it with you and his bimbo secretary with legs up to her armpits?

    :shock:

    *faints . . . . . .

    Hands smelling salts to words :roll:

    I’d have given her one anyway – sounds like a real cracker.

    Bimbo and long legs.

    Sorted.

    That doesn’t sound like you Wordy.

    Have you been drinking again?

    :wink: :lol:

    #514205

    @momentaryloss wrote:

    @wordsworth60 wrote:

    @mrs_teapot wrote:

    @wordsworth60 wrote:

    @momentaryloss wrote:

    . . . . So what is it with you and his bimbo secretary with legs up to her armpits?

    :shock:

    *faints . . . . . .

    Hands smelling salts to words :roll:

    I’d have anyway – sounds like a real cracker.

    Bimbo and long legs.

    Sorted.

    That doesn’t sound like you Wordy.

    Have you been drinking again?

    :wink: :lol:

    Kenty’s far too discerning to fall for my wiles, ML, so I resort to the comforts of the single malt . . . . .

    #514206

    @sceptical guy wrote:

    I agree with tinks on this.

    Cameron was caught by surprise and made a good point in a dignified yet angry manner. The old canard that homosexuality and pedophilia were the same can still rear its ugly head. People have been pasting names of politicians and celebrities who are openly gay or not yet outed, and smearing them wiht pedophile claims.

    It’s a nasty smear. Once someone is accused, it’s impossible to shake off the taint, no matter how unjustified.

    The politican who was claimed to be at the heart of the Wrexham child abuse scandals was just assumed to be guilty. I assumed him to be guilty as well. The victim named him, after all.

    Now we find out that he doesn’t seem to be guilty. It was a guy with the same surname.

    That’s how witch hunts work. Look at a play called The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, or see the movie with Daniel Day Lewis. It’s about the Salem witch trials of 1692, but applies to any witch hunt.

    Jake Arnott, the novelist, made the rigtht point about Cameron yesterday. Thirty years ago, no Tory politican would be seen dead defending gay marriage or gay rights.

    That’s what a genuinely surprised Cameron was doing.

    Schofield is digusting, and is rightly making his grovelling apologies.

    good post scep

    throwing mud at people means some will stick especially using the internet where it is easy to hide behind nom de plumes

    if phillip schofield thinks internet rumours are real then he really needs to think again

    we have been on the receiving end of lies – it is not pleasant but it says more about the people who make false accusations

Viewing 10 posts - 51 through 60 (of 82 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!