-
Posts
-
@jen_jen wrote:
I love it when the reasons that you start a thread are completely missed… :roll:
so what were your reasons?
@jen_jen wrote:
I love it when the reasons that you start a thread are completely missed… :roll:
I get your point. Cameron seems to think that paedophilia and homosexuality are inextricably linked.
They are not, of course.
@j_in_france wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@jen_jen wrote:
I love it when the reasons that you start a thread are completely missed… :roll:
I get your point. Cameron seems to think that paedophilia and homosexuality are inextricably linked.
They are not, of course.
Does he?
Why else, when being asked about a child abuse case and handed a list of suspected paedophiles, would he warn against public child abuse allegations turning into a “witch-hunt” against gay people? A witch hunt against paedophiles, yes, but what has homosexuality got to do with it?
My other reason for starting the thread was around the fact that when the child abuse witch hunt was centred on “celebrities” and, more specifically, the BBC, the Government were perfectly happy for names and accusations to be bandied around to the point of demanding a public enquiry, yet as soon as there’s a whiff of politicians being involved in child abuse it suddenly becomes a witch hunt.
@j_in_france wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@jen_jen wrote:
I love it when the reasons that you start a thread are completely missed… :roll:
I get your point. Cameron seems to think that paedophilia and homosexuality are inextricably linked.
They are not, of course.
Does he?
Why don’t you read the opening post of this thread before you post your inane comments?
@panda12 wrote:
@j_in_france wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@jen_jen wrote:
I love it when the reasons that you start a thread are completely missed… :roll:
I get your point. Cameron seems to think that paedophilia and homosexuality are inextricably linked.
They are not, of course.
Does he?
Why don’t you read the opening post of this thread before you post your inane comments?
ok panda – perhaps you can explain the reasons for the opening post which jen_jen has said that everyone has missed the reason for?
Ummm…look up, a couple of posts ago…
@jen_jen wrote:
@j_in_france wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@jen_jen wrote:
I love it when the reasons that you start a thread are completely missed… :roll:
I get your point. Cameron seems to think that paedophilia and homosexuality are inextricably linked.
They are not, of course.
Does he?
Why else, when being asked about a child abuse case and handed a list of suspected paedophiles, would he warn against public child abuse allegations turning into a “witch-hunt” against gay people? A witch hunt against paedophiles, yes, but what has homosexuality got to do with it?
My other reason for starting the thread was around the fact that when the child abuse witch hunt was centred on “celebrities” and, more specifically, the BBC, the Government were perfectly happy for names and accusations to be bandied around to the point of demanding a public enquiry, yet as soon as there’s a whiff of politicians being involved in child abuse it suddenly becomes a witch hunt.
so the names on the card that schofield showed to cameron are the names of paedophiles?
The prime minister made his comment on This Morning after being unexpectedly handed a list of names of people, who the ITV1 show’s presenter said were being mentioned online as paedophiles.
It’s in the article in the link provided…
@jen_jen wrote:
The prime minister made his comment on This Morning after being unexpectedly handed a list of names of people, who the ITV1 show’s presenter said were being mentioned online as paedophiles.
It’s in the article in the link provided…
so anyone named on the internet is proven guilty of whatever crime they are accused of having committed?
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!