-
Posts
-
@twistinmymelonman wrote:
@taffyfish wrote:
@themaster wrote:
@taffyfish wrote:
Get a life saddo and stop quoting and unquoting!!
Wot Lucy said so in ur face!!!!!!
Now im done!! Yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn!!Hmmm. So starting a fight means you have a life? Whatever, fella. Gutted to have been caught out, I see. Ha!
Now get back in your box. :twisted:
If JC had a “like” button taffy, I would be pressing it 8)
@cherriepie wrote:
William Rodriguez is just ONE example. There are many witnesses who have come forward and stated that there were in fact explosives, the fire fighters, workers.. oh the list goes on.
As opposed to the thousands more that don’t see it like that? How many ‘quotes’ of that day mentioned ‘explosions’? Most probably. At the time, no-one knew what was happening, and it’s human nature to try and understand things in terms we know. A floor collapsing on to the floor below WILL sound like an explosion. A car crash also sounds like an explosion.
So for all the ‘witnesses’ that say there *were* explosions, not ‘sounds like’ explosions, why aren’t they out proving it? Because they can’t. Reason? There were no bombs in the World Trade Centre. More on that here.
@cherriepie wrote:
Just watch the video of the buildings going down, clearly a demolition as Larry Silverstein ordered. “Pull it”.
And proven NOT to have been a demolition many, many times over. But hey, people will believe anything.
Oh and Larry Silverstein… That’s been debunked too.
@cherriepie wrote:
It’s funny how they were able to set up demolition so very quickly too huh? The explosives would have been planted there previously, anyone with a little common sense would know that between chaos, tragedy and confusion… you cannot possibly set up and pull down buildings in that little amount of time. UNLESS… it was already set up.
I really wouldn’t use the term ‘common sense’ when trying to explain a conspiracy theory. It’s an oxymoron.
But, in misery, there’s money to be made. Step forth the Conspiracy Theorists! Ka-ching!
@cherriepie wrote:
The unexpected evacuation of the buildings previous to 911 too…
My building was unexpectedly evacuated on Monday. Hope a plane isn’t about to crash into it… :shock:
@cherriepie wrote:
Watch this … http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qUAtbkzjBQ
Have done. Nothing of note, just more ‘what if..?’ stuff and conjecture. No ‘proof’ as yet…
@cherriepie wrote:
There is so much on 911… I would think people would have submitted to the fact that this was an inside job.
And the fact they haven’t means they don’t think it’s an inside job, yes?
@cherriepie wrote:
People want proof… proof of what? There is more information clearly stating this was an inside job than information stating otherwise.
There really isn’t, you know. Go check.
@cherriepie wrote:
911 is a huge topic and people will choose to believe what they believe.
Yeah. Clearly…
@cherriepie wrote:
Can we get on to Man never landed on the moon… Oh I love that one :P
We did that last week. I won. :)
@momentaryloss wrote:
Hey hey.
There is a perfectly good possibility of a decent debate here.
No need to dis people for seeing things differently. Dis their views but not them as people. And no need to get offended if someone disgrees with you, as long as they’re not dissing you as a person.
I reckon things are more cockup, vicarious liabilities and dereliction of duty than conspiracy myself. Cover ups normally cos people cocked up and powerful enough to cover their ass, not because there’s an elaborate pre-planned X-files type explanation.
Some conspiracies may be true but the big ones like Elvis being alive, Diana dying for any other reason than she didn’t use a seatbelt, man going to the moon etc. push it slightly. 9/11 has plenty of scandals already without saying something else brought the buildings down.
Doesn’t mean we have to be unpleasant to perfectly decent people, even if they are wind up merchants sometimes!
8)
Well said.
Back on topic…
@themaster wrote:
Back on topic…
Very comical ~ let me just study that now. :)
When is an explosion not an explosion? :wink:
Lucky Larry ~ How much did he gain from that tragedy again?
@gazlan wrote:
Very comical ~ let me just study that now. :)
The first 11 floors collapsed ! Not the whole building ?
Losing money as tenancy at 75 percent ~ All the more reason to ” pull it ” so to speak!
Let me study further.
Mostly a play on words is what this video appears.
@gazlan wrote:
When is an explosion not an explosion? :wink:
Well, in none of those examples, for a start. As I said, they ‘SOUND’ like explosions, but so can many things. Nice try though, cute.
@gazlan wrote:
Lucky Larry ~ How much did he gain from that tragedy again?
So are you accusing Larry Silverstein of insurance fraud? If he went on telly and (as you seem to think) admitted to giving the order to ‘pull’ WTC7 (which as I showed earlier, is NOT a code word for demolishing a building)
Meanwhile, as is shown, George Bush claims the video of Bin Laden confessing to 9/11 is without doubt infallible yet we have old Dicko telling us some years later that no proof has been established.
Can our resident ‘ debunker ‘ debunk this anomaly for us i wonder ?
When is an explosion not an explosion?
The answer appears to be ~ when many professional people say they are, including firefighters and rescue workers. . . . . Funny old world aint it?
BOOM-BOOM ! :lol:
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!